Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

The Sicatoka

Moderators
  • Posts

    37,207
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    580

Everything posted by The Sicatoka

  1. Kelley came to his senses and followed the process (committee recommendations) before. He must follow the process, HIS process, again or he's clearly open to the criticism that he's manipulating the outcome.
  2. Dr. Kelley needs to step back and follow the process he defined and just go with two. Otherwise how are we to not believe that he'll change the rules again this round? He needs to maintain the integrity of his own process.
  3. My question is this: Will Kelley backtrack on putting three on the ballot or will he backtrack on not requiring a majority vote in round two? Backtracking and changing the rules midstream are the only parts of this process that have been consistent.
  4. No, he's in the B1G not the NCHC.
  5. To me the GFRRHS issue is a non-issue. For many years in the Canadian Football League (same league!) there were the Rough Riders (Ottawa) and the Roughriders (Saskatchewan). If Canadians could manage that, folks in Grand Forks can manage UND being called "Roughriders".
  6. Folks, Jonathan Toews is a winner.
  7. Is either team being coached by Ditka?
  8. I've wondered that. I wonder what the Qualtrics contract with UND says. If they just have to report the final or outcome results, UND will get a letter that says "___________ won by getting a majority." An open records request will only get that letter to UND (because depending on the contract stipulations Qualtrics is not subject to open records). Now if the contract says "report all survey results to UND" an open records request will show it all.
  9. Subaru, eh? Sturdy. Reliable. Dependable. Efficient. Prepared for anything (symmetrical all wheel drive). In it for the long haul. Roughrider.
  10. Like it or not, people perceive your comments on how well you present them. If you're going to criticise the offensive play calling or the offensive coordinator it might be good to not call them what you hear (offense of) but what the jobs are (offensive). And for the record, I'd like better, less conservative, play calling with a lead. It's pretty clear that in the BSC a 14 point second half lead is something most teams can easily overcome over good defenses.
  11. Someone is reporting Schlossman's doings and antics here. I report the Fargo Forum's doings and antics here. And the difference is ...
  12. Did I say that's what the logo would be? No. That's how the Fargo Forum perceives what a "Nodak" is. The largest newspaper in the state perceives the word "Nodak" to be a bibs wearin' hick. So keep your money, or bet the Forum editorial board (as it's their work), and quit shooting messengers.
  13. Yup. Folks didn't read.
  14. That cartoon was the prime editorial cartoon in Sunday's Fargo Forum. That's not a scare tactic by me; the Forum is putting that out there; that is reality, and not of my doing. Please save your vitriol for them.
  15. The Fargo Forum's view of a "Nodak": Nodak: A bibs wearin' hick.
  16. Or naivety.
  17. What's a Nodak? The Fargo Forum tipped their hand Sunday. So are we bibs wearin' hicks?
  18. Another question: Why the request for a TRO on the vote? What are they afraid of there? If their (dubious in my mind) claim is only the Legislature can do anything isn't the vote moot?
  19. What'd I learn today? If you go here: http://publicsearch.ndcourts.gov/Search.aspx?ID=200&NodeID=110,1118,1132&NodeDesc=Northeast Central District Select search by "Case" and put in "18-2015-CV-01843", search, click the link, and I learned it costs just $140 to make my head hurt.
  20. Let's go to June 2012, the measure as it appeared on the ballot said:[7] So the Legislature passed SB 2370 to require UND to do something other than what it was planning to do. Doesn't that indicate that UND had/has the power and authority to change the name because what the Legislature did precluded UND's rightful authority?
  21. Whathe ... re-e-e-eally? Let's go to June 2012, the measure as it appeared on the ballot said:[7] So the Legislature passed SB 2370 to require UND to do something other than what it was planning to do. Doesn't that indicate that UND had/has the power and authority to change the name because what the Legislature did precluded UND's rightful authority?
  22. And they have standing because ...
×
×
  • Create New...