The Sicatoka

In light of Bresciani's other issues (the non-renewal of contract for six months), in the eyes of the ND SBoHE is this new adventure in being questionably forthright: (a) a positive, (b) neutral, (c) a negative

Punt formation, Mollberg as protector, and shifts under center. What happens next? I'd say the opponent burns a time out and that alone is worth it.

Because they are angry at their guy for messing up but can't admit that to themselves so they refocus the ire somewhere else.

I wonder if Joe Mollberg would work as the deep protector on punt formation ... either way, I'd like that on tape for other teams to fret about.

Uh ... yup. http://forum.siouxsports.com/topic/23250-unds-new-radio-home-in-southern-rrv-kfgo-and-kfan/

The difference: public versus private. Private CEOs are subject to their owners/shareholders. Public employees are subject to the taxpayers and the laws of that State, like FOIA. Bresciani knows that. He erred. And if you're interested in Port's driving records, ... public court records. Have at it.

The cover-up is always worse than the original folly. This cover-up uncovered (verified?) the character of the players involved.

When Port runs on innuendo I have a problem. In this case the proof was written by Bresciani himself and he had to know it was discoverable based on past FOIA requests from FCC and Port.

He may, but it wouldn't be all that professional; let's hope if he does it he's smart enough to not do it in public or in a discoverable text or email.

If facts can ruin a career, what kind of career is it?

The cover-up is always worse than the original folly.

Port's words aren't damning. The Forum editorial board's words aren't damning. Bresciani's own words are damning.

Why hate on Port for reporting on open records. He's just reporting what happened in the participant's own words.

Someone just mentioned to me that the NDUS presidents all meet with Chancellor Hageroth tomorrow. Should be a fun time.

And here is the Forum editorial stating Bresciani should resign for breech of public trust. http://www.inforum.com/opinion/4089353-our-opinion-good-leaders-are-not-born

Sometimes an interim is hired to clean up the previous mess and prepare the way for the successor. And many who enjoyed the mess won't like it. Signed, Ed Schafer

And now the Fargo Forum is calling for Bresciani to resign, not for the media access folly, but for the cover-up of his lies to the media, which is the same as lying to the public. You would think Bresciani is smarter than to lie to someone who buys ink by the barrel. I guess not.

Front page banner headline in today's (Saturday) Fargo Forum good enough? The follow-up email revelations didn't make Saturday's late edition. Only the texts article made it.. I'd guess the emails part of Port's story will be in Sunday's paper.

So he was for the policy before he was against the policy. And when he was against the policy he needed to "fall guy" someone for the policy he was for before he was against it. Bresciani turned from agreeing with Larson to throwing him under the bus. I'm not sure I'd want work for a boss that behaved that way.

Fundamental truism of government and politics: The cover-up is always worse than the original folly.

You may type it, but I hear it in Homer Simpson's voice.

I really didn't mind the black polo Santiago had on at the FB presser yesterday. I'd buy it; I'd wear it.

Try this.

Dear Dave, You are entitled to a viewpoint. I never said otherwise; however, I am not, in any way shape or form, required to respect your viewpoint. I will go to my grave defending every American's right to their viewpoint, but not all viewpoints are equal so some I don't respect. In this case, I view you as a textbook definition turncoat and see your viewpoint in that light. And, before you retort it, no you don't have to respect my viewpoint either. Signed, A University of North Dakota fan

Now that there wasn't evidence for charges Lynch will end up back in those same "bloody stool and dehydrated urine" colors he had on before.