The Sicatoka

This thread is almost still interesting.

There is one and only one conspiracy in these parts, and that is .... The Vast Fighting Sioux Conspiracy If you only knew ....

I believe the BC deal is this: 2 with BC here in 2003-2004 at NE/at BC in 2004-2005 2 with NE (or is it BC again?) here in 2005-2006 at BC/at NE in 2006-2007

Same time Minnesota was made ambassador to Alabama-Huntsville. You get grits. We get wings*. * Canisius is in Buffalo, NY, in case you forgot.

Did someone say ..... Hammer Time! My! My! My! MY! Schneider hits

Borrowed from this week's WCHA Final Five press release: WCHA PLAYOFF CHAMPIONSHIP ATTENDANCE HISTORY

John Gilbert -- the 2004 winner of the "PA and Dubay Excellence in Objective Journalism and Reporting Award" ....

PCM: I'll work with you on the recap rap. bigmrg74: You're just jealous that you can't lay down a track like that.

Back to the paint? Impressive. I thought you were still on the Walmart house brand of thinner. Don't you remember this bout of lyrics I had last year. See what rehab, and staying out of the paint products aisle, could do for you too?

Back on the cheap stuff again, eh PCM?

Who to cheer for in the Friday night semifinal? Easy: The Boards The Glass The Pipes The Ice Hit 'em! Hit 'em again! Go-o-o-o-o-o End Boards! Seriously, give me a good, clean game where the better team that night wins.

And my point is that it is a league contract that is given and that should at a minimum mandate live broadcast of all five at The Five no matter who's playing when.

Highest average per game price in the mens WCHA: Mariucci Arena's tenant. But you didn't answer PCM's question: What can UND or even REA do when someone else controls the rights? The fix for this has to come not from a school but from the league because it is a league contract that gives the rights to the Final Five.

All Fighting Sioux home games are carried regionally on the Fighting Sioux Sports Network. FSSN is carried by Midcontinent and other cable companies in NW MN and North and South Dakota. FSSN also tries to pick up as many feeds from road games as they can. This season they had the Saturday UMD game and a few others. All that aside, this is the league playoffs. Showing both semi-finals is only right. You're telling me that Fox Sports North is getting better ratings with this line-up? 2:00 PM NBA Action '03-'04 2:30 PM Big 12 Showcase '03-'04 3:00 PM On Campus '03-'04 3:30 PM 54321 4:00 PM Spinks vs Mayorga at Boardwalk Hall (rerun from Sunday night) The "money" issue for a Friday afternoon semi-final is a canard. The cameras are there already from Thursday. If you're really cheap just insert the league webcasters' voices or go with no announcers at all. Just turn the cameras on.

No FSN schedule changes here: http://www.foxsports.com/named/FS/Regional...&categoryId=298 Show five at The Five.

Circumstances here easily lead to conspiracy theories: - Minnesota gets what some could easily call preferential treatment - Only one semi-final, the one Minnesota is in, gets TV coverage, yet - The play-in game gets coverage? Is it that Minnesota gets better numbers (gate or TV) or, that Minnesota doesn't want any other good teams (semi-finalists) playing on "their network" and possibly looking better? (Hey, it's a conspiracy theory. It's supposed to be a little wacky.) There's an easy way to make all the conspiracy theories and rhetoric die: Show five at The Five.

How about: Where are the leather seats?

So then let's play it "clean": - dump the "Minnesota rule" - pre-set game times based on seedings (#1 plays at 7:00 pm).

'vindy' catches a great point: What kind of fans won't take half a day (a Friday afternoon no less) off to watch their team play?

First, Anchorage plays on wide ice. The cameras are already in place from Thursday night and ready for Friday night. It's not an issue of "cheap" from that angle. Look at the "quality" Friday afternoon programming they'd preempt. http://siouxsports.com/forums/index.php?&showtopic=2288 Show five at The Five.

All we can give are opinions on Spirko. Let's ask someone who's played against him in the USHL. Q: Rank your opponent: Who is the toughest forward ... you have faced this season? A: Forward would probably be (Rastislav) Spirko (Tri-City). The question was from Jason Shaner of "Hockey's Future." The answer was from (former Minnesota Gopher and current) Des Moines Buc forward Mike Erickson on January 6, 2004.

Fine. Just don't take a swing at anybody if you know what's good for you.

JMB: Even if you are 100% correct, still, why not broadcast all five at The Five?

Diggler, ask the simple questions: You show Thursday night, Friday night, Saturday afternoon, and Saturday night. Why leave out one of The Five, a SEMI-FINAL, on Friday afternoon? The cameras are already in place (see Thursday night and Friday night). Flip the switch. Give the viewers live programming of teams playing for a championship and an NCAA slot. Show all five at The Five.

Forgive me, but why should (almost) home fans need a night game to come out and see their team playing in their "second home" rink? Those fans should turn out just as well for the afternoon semi as the night semi. It's the fans who have to travel that should be given the added (travel) time of playing in the night semi. The locals early, the travelers late, seems to me would be better for the gate (and the local pubs). I'm not thinking it's the league as much as Fox Sports North involved in this scheduling. They do have an "unholy alliance" in place during the regular season and they seem to be able to keep that team on in the evenings at the Five. Does the league get a cut of TV revenues from FSN? Does FSN buy the rights and "pick" who plays when so they get the max? The easy solution is show all five Five games.