Folks, keep your eye on the ball. A man named Myles is trying to fool you with smoke and mirrors.
UND's case is based around:
1. Breech of Contract - The NCAA Executive Committee does not have authority to adopt legislation. The NCAA has breached the Contract in promulgating the Policy because the Executive Committee does not have the power to issue such policies.
2. Lack of Good Faith and Fair Dealing - When the NCAA has attempted to announce a standard, it has consistently and brazenly shifted its position in an arbitrary and capricious manner.
3. Unlawful Restraint on Trade - The Policy is a commercial boycott of members. Identified schools may not bid for or host earned championship events and thereby receive the economic and commercial benefits from hosting championship events and NCAA members are urged to stop scheduling regular season games with UND and other identified schools. In most circumstances, the Policy, as an undisputed group boycott, would be struck as a per se violation of the antitrust laws.
UND is suing not over who reads Spirit Lake's document on what day and what they think it says, no matter what the NCAA is trying to now claim.
UND is suing over breech, good faith, and a boycott.
UND is suing under contract law.