Stromer Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 hmm what if tech and dogs win, are they not both lower in standings than wisco? No Tech is a 6 and UW is a 7. Quote
01grad Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 hmm what if tech and dogs win, are they not both lower in standings than wisco? I was wondering that though too because in some final standings like the USCHO one they have Wisconsin ahead of Tech, but with the same amount of points. I think... Quote
Siouxdonyms Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 These guys just make me want Duluth to win, that much more. Quote
Diggler Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Ciskie (UMD Announcer) is awesome tonight. He's whining about everything. Quote
luapsided Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I was wondering that though too because in some final standings like the USCHO one they have Wisconsin ahead of Tech, but with the same amount of points. I think... I think that is what i was looking at, uscho standings...oops Quote
Stromer Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I was wondering that though too because in some final standings like the USCHO one they have Wisconsin ahead of Tech, but with the same amount of points. I think... The Ralph also had UW ahead of Tech on the video board last night but Tech has the tie breaker. Quote
sprig Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 St. Clown announcers going crazy because goal light came on prematurely. Now they're saying after looking at the replay that it may have crossed the line, even though it clearly shows that it's not over the line. Homers. They are afraid their "dynasty" would end Quote
01grad Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 This is what was throwing me off because I didn't know the exact seedings of the tourney and I was looking at this.... http://www.uscho.com/standings/?type=d1?ty...16&gender=m Quote
Smoggy Posted March 12, 2007 Author Posted March 12, 2007 The Ralph also had UW ahead of Tech on the video board last night but Tech has the tie breaker. Exactly. That's why Tech got the 6th seed and uw got 7th. Quote
Let'sGoHawks! Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 They are afraid their "dynasty" would end "We're still second!" What a joke of a chant when the Sioux beat em. Quote
Hambone Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 To clear up confusion: If SCSU wins, then it's Wisco vs. Tech/CC winner in the play in game, UND vs. SCSU and Minnesota vs winner of the play-in If UMD wins, then it's Wisco vs. UMD in play in, UND vs. Tech/CC winner and Minnesota vs. winner of play-in Is everyone on the same page? Quote
sprig Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 This is what was throwing me off because I didn't know the exact seedings of the tourney and I was looking at this.... http://www.uscho.com/standings/?type=d1?ty...16&gender=m Always trust this site. Check out the hockey home front page Quote
Siouxdonyms Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 To clear up confusion: If SCSU wins, then it's Wisco vs. Tech/CC winner in the play in game, UND vs. SCSU and Minnesota vs winner of the play-in If UMD wins, then it's Wisco vs. UMD in play in, UND vs. Tech/CC winner and Minnesota vs. winner of play-in Is everyone on the same page? Page 4, right? Quote
luapsided Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 To clear up confusion: If SCSU wins, then it's Wisco vs. Tech/CC winner in the play in game, UND vs. SCSU and Minnesota vs winner of the play-in If UMD wins, then it's Wisco vs. UMD in play in, UND vs. Tech/CC winner and Minnesota vs. winner of play-in Is everyone on the same page? yup Quote
UMDDogz Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Page 4, right? Yes, clear...but satill quite cloudy... Quote
Sioux Hockey Fanatic Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 So UCSHO reports SCSU over UMD in OT 2-3. Quote
farce poobah Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 So UCSHO reports SCSU over UMD in OT 2-3. Yup - sounded like a terrific game. Quote
franchise Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Maybe I'm just bitter becuz I thought the Dogs controlled the 2nd and 3rd OTs and deserved to win, but St. Clown just made me sick at the end. Not even a sweep, but they slip past the #9 seed and they do a stick salute. They do one just for the student. Then one more across the rink. And then a senior only one. I hope the Sioux destroy em. Quote
Sioux Hockey Fanatic Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I just checked the box scores. Bobby G had 66 saves. Both the goalies faced shots in the upper 60's. SCSU is going to be very tired. Guess the fans there got their money's worth tonight. Quote
UMDDogz Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Maybe I'm just bitter becuz I thought the Dogs controlled the 2nd and 3rd OTs and deserved to win, but St. Clown just made me sick at the end. Not even a sweep, but they slip past the #9 seed and they do a stick salute. They do one just for the student. Then one more across the rink. And then a senior only one. I hope the Sioux destroy em. What made me sick was they "Hey, you suck" chant by the students, who wouldn't know a good hockey game if it hit them in their thick heads. A loss, an OT win, and a 3 OT win does not do much to prove the superiority of one team over another. To quote a famous NFL personality... "The Huskies are who we THOUGHT they were...they are who we THOUGHT they were...and we LET EM OFF THE HOOK!!" Great series, Dogs. You showed them that a 9 seed in the WCHA is still a damn good hockey team, and we're proud to be Bulldogs fans. I'll be sporting my jersey for all games at the X!! GO SIOUX! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.