Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not sure if it's being done in Grand Forks. A brewery (Huss Brewery Co.) in Tempe has made a beer for NIL purposes for ASU Athletics. Something the collective, school, and a local brewery could work on.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

heard a guy that normally and still does give to und athletics doesn't think that the 1883 collective is a "good deal"....thinks the fees for running it are a little out of whack or something...

is the 1883 comparable to oher schools in the region and country?

Posted
15 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

heard a guy that normally and still does give to und athletics doesn't think that the 1883 collective is a "good deal"....thinks the fees for running it are a little out of whack or something...

is the 1883 comparable to oher schools in the region and country?

What fees are being taken out? Last I heard they were pretty minimal.

Posted
1 minute ago, jdub27 said:

What fees are being taken out? Last I heard they were pretty minimal.

not sure...something about 5% operating something or other...guy is in finance and whatnot and thinks that they are a little excessive...said you keep gray with just the operating expenses alone or something

Posted
1 hour ago, gfhockey said:

Bonzer holth taking a cut?

i think we knew that...people don't work for free.....but what is the actual % or number and is it excessive compared to our peers

Posted
3 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

i think we knew that...people don't work for free.....but what is the actual % or number and is it excessive compared to our peers

Compared to what "agents" are taking, if it is 5% to run operations, that would be well below market.
Pretty sure they also charge any fees to the donor on top of the NIL to the player, so the player isn't taking a cut in what they get. It is somewhat semantics at that point, but the business is paying, not the player.

Posted
4 minutes ago, jdub27 said:

Compared to what "agents" are taking, if it is 5% to run operations, that would be well below market.
Pretty sure they also charge any fees to the donor on top of the NIL to the player, so the player isn't taking a cut in what they get. It is somewhat semantics at that point, but the business is paying, not the player.

but if a big(ger) donor like this guy is isn't happy....who is?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...