Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

I get what you are saying but I absolutely hate the term "trap game". In fact they did a study on it disproving the theory there was such a thing. I see no letdown from last weekends sweep vs CC as we didnt even play that well Saturday, and I dont think they are looking ahead to Miami at this point. Perhaps we just suck and get beat but certainly not a trap of any sorts. Sorry for the rant just hate the term and its so called definition.

Trap game.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

I get what you are saying but I absolutely hate the term "trap game". In fact they did a study on it disproving the theory there was such a thing. I see no letdown from last weekends sweep vs CC as we didnt even play that well Saturday, and I dont think they are looking ahead to Miami at this point. Perhaps we just suck and get beat but certainly not a trap of any sorts. Sorry for the rant just hate the term and its so called definition.

who did what kind of study on what?  The neutral zone trap? The left wing lock forecheck?  I know these forechecking schemes exist...

Posted

who did what kind of study on what?  The neutral zone trap? The left wing lock forecheck?  I know these forechecking schemes exist...

the op wasn't referring to the term "trap" as far as a hockey strategy but rather the fact we were playing a bad team and we could overlook them.

Posted

There was no trap, we just played like crap.

It was a trap for the reason they came off a long road trip and were undefeated, all the while being told how bad Wisconsin is, which leads them to believe with home ice they shouldn't have a problem.  Sounds like a definition of a "trap" to me.  Yeah, it all comes down to effort, but that is what they mean by trap, not being fully into a game because of circumstances leading up to or after that game.  Glad you could make money betting against the Sioux, but it makes me believe you don't believe your own opinions.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

the op wasn't referring to the term "trap" as far as a hockey strategy but rather the fact we were playing a bad team and we could overlook them.

Sometimes good teams lose to bad teams, it happens. This is kinda what I meant, normally it doesn't happen though, and if it does it was not because of some sort of trap. https://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2012/11/22/debunking-the-trap-game-and-letdown-game-myths/

Man we sure missed Drake last night though, Him being out kind of altered every single line and really changed things IMO, 5-1 Sioux tonight

 

Posted

Sometimes good teams lose to bad teams, it happens. This is kinda what I meant, normally it doesn't happen though, and if it does it was not because of some sort of trap. https://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2012/11/22/debunking-the-trap-game-and-letdown-game-myths/

Man we sure missed Drake last night though, Him being out kind of altered every single line and really changed things IMO, 5-1 Sioux tonight

One of the reasons I am somewhat distrustful of scientists is that they truly believe you can quantify things that are inherently qualitative in nature. The "trap game" phenomenon is a very qualitative thing and is very hard to measure.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

If not a trap a full ice press I prefer to call a trap & harass us as much as possible & we kept changing lines at the wrong time

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...