Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Boston university. Where was the game at? Quote
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Posted January 24, 2004 Where was the game at? wisconsin? Quote
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 wisconsin? Correct. Thanks for the entertainment. Bochenski needs to finish. Quote
Hair Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 is it still 5-0 in power plays? UND is just now on their first PP. Quote
7>4 Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 1-0 CC over Wisco. 29 seconds in first COME ON SIOUX, LET'S GET THE EQUALIZER. Quote
BostonSiouxFan Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Hey, I'm watching the game, but listening to the Sioux broadcast on the radio. Has anyone heard whether Fox Sports is cutting away to the Wild game at 9:30? Unfortunately, I would think contractually they'd have to. If anyone has heard, let me know. Thanks. Quote
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 The goofer fans were bragging about their TV contract. Let's hope they were right and that all of the game will be shown. Otherwise, I would say your TV contract is better because they show the complete game when they televise it. Quote
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 3-0 for the Sioux and no goal!!! I have seen better execution by peewees!!! What crap is that!!! Quote
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Posted January 24, 2004 3-0 for the Sioux and no goal!!! I have seen better execution by peewees!!! What crap is that!!! Bad Decision on the shot by porter. Quote
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 They should have slowed it down so they at least had one guy on each side. Going straight on it might have helped to just drop it too. Quote
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Posted January 24, 2004 The second period p*ssed me off. The sioux look too laid back out there. Quote
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 I missed the first period and did not get to watch very closely for part of the second, but the Sioux do not seem to be playing very good hockey in what I saw, IMO. Hopefully they come out firing and get some good bounces in the third... Quote
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 The second period p*ssed me off. The sioux look too laid back out there. Especially Lundbohm! What is up with him this year! He needs to get his act together this year! Does he have senioritis? The one play if he would have skated a little faster he could have stoped the UM play but he did not. If he keeps it up, he better be sitting in the stands for another game or two!!! Quote
jimdahl Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Hard to argue that the Gophers owned that period. Fortunately there's one more, and it's one that's been good to the Sioux: +34 so far this season in the 3rd. Quote
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Hard to argue that the Gophers owned that period. Fortunately there's one more, and it's one that's been good to the Sioux: +34 so far this season in the 3rd. We were thrown off our game with that power play we got. Quote
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Did anyone see last Saturday's game? Did Hale really get hit first because the AR's let go at different times? I would think the AR's should receive criticism for allowing that to happen. Quote
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Posted January 24, 2004 Did anyone see last Saturday's game? Did Hale really get hit first because the AR's let go at different times? I would think the AR's should receive criticism for allowing that to happen. I believe thats the way it happened according to a sioux fan who posted about his experiences in Houghton last weekend. Quote
Mad Man Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Since UM already has 24 shots on net it doesn't look like the Sioux will hold them to under 20. Lundbolm isn't playing that bad tonight. He is at least winning some faceoffs and has had a few scoring chances. Quote
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 I believe thats the way it happened according to a sioux fan who posted about his experiences in Houghton last weekend. I know another person said that it wasn't true, so I'm just hoping for a majority one way or the other. Quote
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 In Hale's interview he said that one ref let go of the MT thug, but he was still being held by the other ref and that gave the MT thug a free hit. Quote
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Since UM already has 24 shots on net it doesn't look like the Sioux will hold them to under 20. Thanks Captain Obvious. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.