Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Boston university. Where was the game at? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman91 Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 game on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 weirdest game I have ever seen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Share Posted January 24, 2004 Where was the game at? wisconsin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 wisconsin? Correct. Thanks for the entertainment. Bochenski needs to finish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Share Posted January 24, 2004 UND needs to play some defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Share Posted January 24, 2004 is it still 5-0 in power plays? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hair Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 is it still 5-0 in power plays? UND is just now on their first PP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7>4 Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 1-0 CC over Wisco. 29 seconds in first COME ON SIOUX, LET'S GET THE EQUALIZER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BostonSiouxFan Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Hey, I'm watching the game, but listening to the Sioux broadcast on the radio. Has anyone heard whether Fox Sports is cutting away to the Wild game at 9:30? Unfortunately, I would think contractually they'd have to. If anyone has heard, let me know. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 The goofer fans were bragging about their TV contract. Let's hope they were right and that all of the game will be shown. Otherwise, I would say your TV contract is better because they show the complete game when they televise it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 3-0 for the Sioux and no goal!!! I have seen better execution by peewees!!! What crap is that!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Share Posted January 24, 2004 3-0 for the Sioux and no goal!!! I have seen better execution by peewees!!! What crap is that!!! Bad Decision on the shot by porter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 They should have slowed it down so they at least had one guy on each side. Going straight on it might have helped to just drop it too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Share Posted January 24, 2004 The second period p*ssed me off. The sioux look too laid back out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 I missed the first period and did not get to watch very closely for part of the second, but the Sioux do not seem to be playing very good hockey in what I saw, IMO. Hopefully they come out firing and get some good bounces in the third... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 The second period p*ssed me off. The sioux look too laid back out there. Especially Lundbohm! What is up with him this year! He needs to get his act together this year! Does he have senioritis? The one play if he would have skated a little faster he could have stoped the UM play but he did not. If he keeps it up, he better be sitting in the stands for another game or two!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimdahl Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Hard to argue that the Gophers owned that period. Fortunately there's one more, and it's one that's been good to the Sioux: +34 so far this season in the 3rd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Hard to argue that the Gophers owned that period. Fortunately there's one more, and it's one that's been good to the Sioux: +34 so far this season in the 3rd. We were thrown off our game with that power play we got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Did anyone see last Saturday's game? Did Hale really get hit first because the AR's let go at different times? I would think the AR's should receive criticism for allowing that to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2Bad1 Posted January 24, 2004 Author Share Posted January 24, 2004 Did anyone see last Saturday's game? Did Hale really get hit first because the AR's let go at different times? I would think the AR's should receive criticism for allowing that to happen. I believe thats the way it happened according to a sioux fan who posted about his experiences in Houghton last weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Man Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Since UM already has 24 shots on net it doesn't look like the Sioux will hold them to under 20. Lundbolm isn't playing that bad tonight. He is at least winning some faceoffs and has had a few scoring chances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 I believe thats the way it happened according to a sioux fan who posted about his experiences in Houghton last weekend. I know another person said that it wasn't true, so I'm just hoping for a majority one way or the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fighting Sioux Fan Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 In Hale's interview he said that one ref let go of the MT thug, but he was still being held by the other ref and that gave the MT thug a free hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fedorov Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Since UM already has 24 shots on net it doesn't look like the Sioux will hold them to under 20. Thanks Captain Obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.