nodak651 Posted Friday at 09:15 AM Posted Friday at 09:15 AM 15 hours ago, forksandspoons said: Lotta vocal people against it, but it seems like the majority is for the project, just not as vocal. Need people to voice support to the CC. Would be a huge mistake if it doesn’t get done. That land will sit unused for decades generating zero tax revenue. Makes it way more appealing to visit UND/Grand Forks with the guys for sporting events. The indoor simulators at the mall are something I'd never go to.... not direct competition imo. Will potentially even help the simulator business by introducing more people to the game. SHOULD be an easy yes vote, especially after UND was forced to downsize the apartment project and seperate the buildings. 1 2 Quote
tjamz Posted yesterday at 07:00 PM Posted yesterday at 07:00 PM On 7/30/2026 at 10:24 PM, SIOUXFAN97 said: 1. add women's hockey for 20 years and see what happens to your athletic department...it would take another 20 years to get it back................................. 2. define "up" 1. We'll learn from your mistakes, thank you. 2. FBS is a step up. MWC in it's current iteration could very well be a parallel move from a competition standpoint. But I once said that about the Sunbelt as well. Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted yesterday at 07:12 PM Posted yesterday at 07:12 PM 11 minutes ago, tjamz said: 1. We'll learn from your mistakes, thank you. 2. FBS is a step up. MWC in it's current iteration could very well be a parallel move from a competition standpoint. But I once said that about the Sunbelt as well. fbs isn't a monlith....g6 is not what you think it is. Quote
FSSD Posted yesterday at 07:17 PM Posted yesterday at 07:17 PM 11 minutes ago, tjamz said: 1. We'll learn from your mistakes, thank you. 2. FBS is a step up. MWC in it's current iteration could very well be a parallel move from a competition standpoint. But I once said that about the Sunbelt as well. Well, the problem with the NDSU's approach to Title IX is that programs have to be added if interest exists. So, they have limited control: looking forward to women's wrestling, hockey and flag football in the near future. 1 3 Quote
Bison Dan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 16 hours ago, FSSD said: Well, the problem with the NDSU's approach to Title IX is that programs have to be added if interest exists. So, they have limited control: looking forward to women's wrestling, hockey and flag football in the near future. LOL -Yours is to just !@#$ can the program. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.