Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

snova4

Members
  • Posts

    889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by snova4

  1. On 1/6/2017 at 5:58 PM, Fetch said:

    I read this - interesting point of view - hard to believe their still there - Trump sure has a lot on his plate after Jan 20th

    http://www.thefader.com/2017/01/06/the-survival-of-standing-rock-dap 

    Nothing changed my mind about the need for the pipeline - this writer was just interesting from the point of view of how this got to where it is

    I find the article interesting because she made several points to call the protests peaceful, while two lines later describing how they want a physical confrontation, and stating how protestors say they would have killed the workers. 

    • Upvote 1
  2. 8 hours ago, cberkas said:

    Was not the Colorado River, it was the Animas River.

    I believe he's referring to the spill that happened to the Colorado, while the government did nothing and said nothing about it. While this current spill is tragic, it also shows why the Dakota Access Pipe needs to be built. The company that built the pipeline that ruptured is notorious for shoddy work. Energy transfer is not, and has gone above and beyond Federal requirements, with it's state of the art technology. Saying we should compare the two is like saying Toyota has a recall so let's stop production on all Ford and Chevy vehicles.

    • Upvote 4
  3. On 12/9/2016 at 2:16 PM, cberkas said:

    When it comes to explosives there is a key thing that would have came up. Shrapnel, if she was hit with an explosive or one went off, her and other would have shrapnel in their bodies.

    Not necessarily. While shrapnel does do a significant amount of damage, you can't discount the amount of damage that gas and air alone can do. Think of a firecracker or an M80, cherry bomb for you old timers. Neither of those items have any shrapnel to them, but each can take your hand off with gas and air alone. A propane tank, while obviously capable of creating shrapnel due to the metal exterior, doesn't actually require that metal to do the damage. All it would really take is a puncture to the outside of the tank, and the gases that are escaping coming into contact with a hear source and it will cause the air around you to explode. Think of a gas leak blowing up an entire house, it's not the shrapnel that causes the damage, but the gas released. While the picture of the tanks show them burned and charred but mostly intact, it could have been the gas escaping the tank, and her being in close proximity to it that caused the injuries. I'm not a professional in explosives, but I do know that flash bangs don't explode, and stingers only "pop" open to release the rubber balls. A concussion grenade, which isn't used by law enforcement at all and only sparingly in certain situations by the military, would have killed her and the other individual if one had been used in that close of proximity. It's also highly likely it would have killed law enforcement in the area as well.

  4. 18 hours ago, siouxfaninseattle said:

    Speaking of missing arms, has there been any updates recently on the brave water protector that was so brutally butchered by the military establishment? ;)

    Her father sure has been media silent. I'm sure before too long you'll see some sort of domestic terrorism or other Federal charges against her. ATF and joint terrorism task force don't take kindly to IEDs being used on law enforcement.

    • Upvote 1
  5. 6 hours ago, Oxbow6 said:

    Heard Sanford in Bismarck is doing a 2 for 1 digit amputees for severe frostbite...................

    #whyaremyfingersandtoesblack

    Well, according to the protectors, law enforcement will take a whole arm for free.

    • Upvote 1
  6. On 12/2/2016 at 1:02 PM, siouxkid12 said:

    you are correct, they did have a replica, which was closer to the real thing than the k1 brand. they pop up on eBay from time to time.

    I've picked up a couple of them myself. I've also got a Schneider practice jersey my wife swiped from his roommate before she broke up with him. It's the Nike white dazzle style. Beautiful jersey.

  7. 59 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

    I hope they DON'T rely on political connections. That's what wrong here. 

    First, that is already an energy corridor. That water is under the bridge (see what I did there? ;) ). The engineering science says keep all the like stuff together. That area is already monitored for pipeline leaks ... from the first pipeline put in there back in the 1980s! That's the ... wait for it ... science. 

    Next, I don't want ETP to go political. I want them to go legal. Quite literally, sue the Army Corps for reneging on their permit approval. But, do it by naming personally everyone involved in the decision, all the way to the top. If those people, individually, can't prove their decision was sound to the objective process they are liable for abuse, and corruption, and maybe fraud. How about bankrupting them personally and them spending a few days as a ward of the State. 

    The catch? None of that will happen. 

    What will happen is it'll go political. On or about 1500 hours Eastern on 20 January 2016, an Executive Order will come down permitting that pipeline. It'll become just the latest political mud pie that Side X will throw into the face of Side Y. 

    Sadly, you are quite correct. I would rather have them challenge it in the court, just as you said as well, but what that will also likely lead to is the American taxpayer funding this pipeline. You can't tell me that there isn't overwhelming proof that through petty politics, our government has cost Energy Transfer millions of dollars. I don't find it that much of a stretch that they could easily sue the government for lost capital and other expenses incurred due to the stalling techniques used.

     

    Along those same lines, I can see the case easily made that North Dakota can be reimbursed through Federal funds for every dollar of expense incurred as well through the unlawful occupation of Corps land. That land has essentially been used as a staging platform for continued unlawful activity that the feds were aware of, and did nothing to stop. I don't think it's that far of a stretch to say that every unlawful activity that has taken place, they are an accomplice to.

    • Upvote 1
  8. 10 hours ago, Siouxman said:

    Do I understand this correctly, that the Corps originally approved the Missouri crossing permit, then pulled it back and denied it?  That could surely be grounds for a lawsuit, especially with the money invested.  How many wealthy investors in this project and in the pipeline project are now leaning on their political connections?

    You are correct. The permit was twice challenged by Standing Rock in the courts, and they twice lost that challenge. I don't understand the thought process behind reneging on the permit. What message does it send to possible future investors in our nation's infrastructure? That if some radical group disagrees and you have a sympathetic president that the whole project can be shut down.

    • Upvote 1
  9. On 11/16/2016 at 8:10 AM, The Sicatoka said:

    After seeing Casselton, no, I couldn't wish that on the locals down there. 

    Casselton was bad. I sat at the Oriska exit for 18 hours in case the smoke cloud dropped onto the interstate so we could close it. One of the longest shifts of my life. Thankfully whatever weather condition that would cause the cloud to drop never occurred. 

  10. 2 hours ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

    I have a buddy that's a sheriff deputy that's out there too.

    Thank you doesn't began to express the gratitude I have for what you're doing out there or every other day.

    Tell him thank you as well. I try and thank as many of the out of state guys i can. I realize your friend is probably in State, and could likely narrow down the county since there's about 5 main counties assisting. I've put about 350 hours in on the protest alone since September, plus working my normal post. Only major thing I missed during this was the charging of the horses at my colleagues. October 27th was intense, I've never been part of something like that, and we knew many of the protestors had weapons so we were kind of waiting for the shooting to happen. It's crazy how that five seconds or so went it slow motion. I can still picture that gun.

    When this is over, I just hope the communities can heal. Standing Rock is really getting a black eye out of this, and it's not those citizens that are causing problems. In fact, it's a real small number of protestors really causing problems, maybe about 400 out of the several thousand that may be there at any given time. The majority of the protestors haven't been as destructive as they've been made to be, and we haven't been nearly as heavy handed as we've been made out to be by them.

    • Upvote 3
  11. 4 hours ago, UNDBIZ said:

    I guess I'm not a big fan of extended prison sentences for people who didn't physically or financially harm anyone else. 

    That's not entirely true. That meth comes from somewhere, produced by someone, trafficked by someone, sold by someone. Somewhere along the line, blood is shed , people have died, and more families wrecked than can be imagined. You'll never hear out of my mouth that drug use is victimless. 

    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...