Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

scpa0305

Members
  • Posts

    10,142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by scpa0305

  1. Big time…I just read this on X, boys are 8-9 against ncaa tourney teams, 17-1-2 against everyone else.
  2. How in the hell did we get swept by UNO last weekend? Fun beat down last bunt, I’m still a bit worried though come tourney time. We’ve been iffy since the Xmas break
  3. I don’t know if he’s Und good…but I’ve seen him play. He’s good.
  4. Yep I remember his birthdate looking odd. Same with the Moorhead (I.e Fargo ) kid this year. Nothing to take away from their talent. They are/were very old freshman who couldn’t even play bantams by rule.
  5. He may not have been offered. Clearly the O is there. But a 5’6” dman? You have to be beyond special to have a role at that size.
  6. Carter Murphy to the dogs…interesting. I thought he was ours.
  7. Scary thing about committing that early…there’s a ways to go before college puck.
  8. This is the most plausible answer. TBH, not sure he gets in a game next season and moving would have most likely been tough for him. BSU is a great landing spot for him. Guessing this was all worked out behind the scenes.
  9. He’s a senior now and the plan is for him to play a full yr of juniors. So no, he won’t be a true frosh. He should go late second to somewhere in the 4th. Taking the slower route which is great tbh.
  10. Schultz is gone. I would assume Simpson is too but I recently heard there was some sort of dust up with TC. I believe he’s back now so maybe they worked it all out.
  11. Blake will play in the NHL for a long time. He needs to play one more year though. Def could play next year..I think time should be spent getting more consistent on the D side. But his O game is there right now.
  12. I’m sure we’re in on him. Almost positive actually. But…as you noted, he’s a special one that may just play in the Dub. If heard he may play for Brooks or Okatoks in the BC next year to keep his options open.
  13. Starting to agree here…we have Denver’s number but since the Xmas break we’ve been really hot and cold. Goaltending has been very very avg. these sweeps against are brutal.
  14. They has their backup in and we only scored on a 5x3?
  15. That’s not on the coach. Plays have to play. Unless he had some big coaching blunder. I didn’t watch the game.
  16. Getting swept 2 of the last 3 weekends doesn’t seem like a squad ready to hit the ploffs. But we swept UMD.
  17. Not sure what team I’m watching. Really inconsistent. Expectations have changed a bit for me. Super good teams aren’t this inconsistent. Sweeps can’t happen at this time of the year. Luck will be needed.
  18. Raw but super good. He was at the 40 man camp last year so he’s a known commodity. I think folks are trying to figure out if he’s leaning football or hockey.
  19. Very boring game. They didn’t come to play tonight. Agree that they didn’t play until the final 4 minutes. Zero sense of urgency during the third.
  20. Boy was that disappointing. Super boring.
  21. Wonder what it would take to flip Shaugabay
  22. Top 3 09 in NA. Guessing gophers
  23. I still haven’t really watched him play that much. There must be a reason.
×
×
  • Create New...