fightingsioux4life

1-7

<H3>Aaron Q. posted 10/22/09 @ 5:06 PM CST As much as most UND fans are probably hesistant to admit, sportsmanlike etiquette also dictates that taunting another team's goaltender after he lets in a goal (i.e. chanting 'sieve', pronounced 'siv') is not appropriate. If we, as a crowd, can be a bit more civil, maybe karma will grant us another National Championship this year.</H3></H3> This is the same publication, of course, that wants the Fighting Sioux name and logo gone. I wonder if yelling too loud is also "unsportsmanlike" in the eyes of the DS editorial staff?

The new Ralph is finally getting a good atmosphere, it took quite a long time. I think it also helps that people like Tom Behring are no longer in charge of REA and Charles "Let's dissolve the student section" Kupchella is no longer President. This, however, has raised the ire of the anti-student, pro "family atmosphere" crowd. The whiny, crying puff piece written by Mike Jacobs in the Heraldo this week encapsulated the views of this group. If this crowd had it's way, everyone would politely clap for both teams instead of supporting one and harrassing the other. Every game would feel and sound like "Disney Stars on Ice". As for profanity in the student section, I think it was much worse during the 1980's than it is now. If we aren't hosting the Gophers or Badgers, you don't hear it all that much. I went to games in the 1980's as a grade schooler and it was rampant in almost every home game. The bottom line is, I didn't grow up talking like a drunken sailor because I went to the Old Ralph as a kid and today's kids won't either. Let's keep the good times rolling at The Ralph.

I am a long-time hockey season-ticket holder, but........AMEN!

Our Division II powerhouse teams would have beaten USF by at least two touchdowns, if not more. We cannot keep telling ourselves that we are still a Division II team. We have to think, act and talk like an FCS program. Otherwise, it won't get better anytime soon.

Are you ducky or bunny? Copyright 2009 Dan "The Common Man" Cole of Woodbury, MN. All Rights Reserved.

This is a point that is not talked about enough. Lennon claims it isn't true, but I think he got sick and tired of 5,000 people for home playoff games. I think he got sick and tired of the total lack of marketing for this program. Until this year, there was no marketing of the football team until the week of the first game (Oh, by the way, our first football game is this weekend. Tickets are available! Come on out unless you have better things to do! ). I think Lennon was fed up with the "hunting season" excuse used to explain away bad attendance at home games. I also think Lennon was fed up with the "Co-Acting Athletic Directors" three-ring circus that we had in the Athletic Department before Faison was hired. I think this is why Lennon was going to "Stand Pat" in recruiting the same traditional areas after we moved up because he knew the old Athletic Department regime wouldn't make the financial commitment that would be needed to recruit more nationally. In sharp contrast, Southern Illinois offered him a 100% increase in his salary and promises of a 15,000 seat stadium and all the facilities to go with it. No wonder he left. Having said all that, I think we have solid leadership (President Kelley and Faison) in place now and I think they will turn things around. But the program is still in need of some serious overhaul. This Co-Defensive Coordinator experiment has failed and needs to be changed NOW (I don't think we should wait until the season is over). And I haven't been thrilled with the play calling on offense, either. Bottom line, I don't care HOW good USF is, losing to an NAIA team is just inexcusable. Are you listening and watching, Mr. Faison?

Thanks, you brought a smile to my face!

I believe Indiana State is a terrible program (haven't won since 2006), so that shouldn't surprise anyone. UW-Lacrosse is a Division III program (that means ZERO athletic scholarships), so that was technically worse than what happened to us today. And we didn't roll over UNI like Sioux Falls did to us today, it was a good game from start to finish. This was a stinker from start to finish. Mike Berg will just say "we ran into a darn good football team". Well, this is just a taste of what we will run into in FCS ball and right now we can't cut it. No more excuses. Changes need to be made in this program (especially the defense) or it's going to get worse before it gets better.

I have been waiting to hear someone say this and it's simply not true. Most of the established FCS programs would not lose to this team. I don't think even UC-Davis or Cal-Poly would lose to this team. Our DII powerhouse teams would not lose to this team. They would beat the Bison this year (soon to be 1-6) and all of the FCS non-scholarship teams, but there is a big difference between 63 scholarships and 24. This loss sets the program back three huge steps and it could take all of this season and next to get those steps back. Absolutely the worst loss in program history. I think practice next week should start with the simple sentence "Gentlemen, this is a football."

There are back-to-back triple-header football/hockey weekends in October. October 9th and 10th (Stony Brook and Merrimack) and October 16th and 17th (Sioux Falls and Minnesota). Should be a lot of fun!

Don't get me wrong, I'm not giving up on the season yet. But there are some real concerns about the team in particular and the program in general that must be addressed. I think next week could determine whether this season gets turned around or goes straight into the tank.

I think people understand that we are a transitional team. I think people understand we won't win every game. But I also think that our fans expected to be a little more competitive than this. If we are ever going to be competitive in the upper echelon of DI FCS, a lot of things will have to change, especially in the next five years or so. Otherwise, we will develop a self-fulfilling reputation as a bottom-feeding, low-level FCS program. Once you get labeled like that, it will be hard to get the top-notch athletes you need to have to win games at this level. That is not what we had in mind when we decided to move up from our cushy spot in the world of DII. I think that is what people are a little concerned about.

Good points, but I watched some of USD's game today vs. SE Louisiana in the Dakota Dome and they looked really good on offense. I am concerned on the fast track of the Alerus Center that we'll have more problems with the passing game next week.

I've never been a fan of this co-defensive coordinator arrangement and I think I am being proven right. Even in our last years in DII, the defense was a shell of it's former self after Tim Tibesar left for Kansas State. It hasn't gotten better in our early years of FCS ball. This has to be fixed.

It's going to be the Noah Sheppard Show at The Al next week at 4pm CST. Is a winning season still in the cards? I sure hope so. We have to win games to get the type of athletes we will need to compete at this level.

What? The defense forced SFA to settle for a field goal?!?! I guess we will take what we can get at this point.

The Kelling/Mannasau coaching duo has never been a big user of the pass rush. The defense hasn't really "gotten after it" (as Dale Lennon used to put it) since Tim Tibesar left town to take the job at Kansas State. We will have to put pressure on the QB at this level because the QB's at this level will eat you alive if you don't make them squirm a little.

There's Mike Berg with his "this is a good football team we are playing" comment again. Coach, please tell us something we don't already know. I miss Tony Stein!

There are a lot of "excellent teams" in DI FCS and our schedule will be full of them in the coming years. We had better get some better athletes into the program during the next couple of years or we will have to get used to results like this.

I hope you are right. I don't want to watch a repeat of last year on the defensive side of the ball.

You beat me to the punch!

Maybe we'll be able to slow down Stony Brook? I thought the defense would be better this year. So much for that idea.

This kind of nonsense almost (and I emphasize ALMOST) makes me want to put Denver ahead of the Gophers on my list of teams I love to hate. January 29th and 30th at The Ralph. Mark your calendars. Let's give Gwoz something to REALLY complain about!

Oh no, ANYONE but Craig Perry. Perry "coached" Central for two seasons after Chuck Ness left to coach in Duluth (I think it was 1997-98 and 1998-99). He was also the Grand Forks Athletic Director at the same time. Those were two of the worst Central teams ever up until that point. Lack of talent was definitely a problem, but I couldn't believe how bad those teams were. Both teams failed to reach the State Tournament. Finally in 1999, Tarek Howard took over and the team became respectable again. I don't EVER want Perry coaching ANY Grand Forks team EVER again! Period! End Rant.