fightingsioux4life

I think it was 20K or 25K. Those numbers might work with Mayville State or UM-Crookston, but not an FCS program.

I believe Bunning's track record was even worse. Thank God we have Faison now; he has done a solid job of avoiding buyouts.

To be fair, FU had to bring in Ferris (Wheel) State because they had to find a last-minute replacement and that is all that was left. I don't think they are happy about it at all.

I believe that whole chair-throwing incident was contrived to get his team fired up (I think they were losing that game).

Please tell me you are not trying to compare and contrast Belichick and Mussman. That is apples and oranges x 1000. I am on the fence about Mussman, but I do think this is a big season for him and his staff.

I think a 7-4 record with a couple of signature wins vs. top FCS teams would qualify as a successful season. It also would reassure our fan base that the program is taking positive steps forward.

I guess it's a "free market" for the cable companies as they negotiate amongst themselves. But it's not the "free market" I learned about in college (or even high school for that matter). What you are describing is a oligopoly or a duopoly. While a perfectly competitive market does not (and probably never has and never will) exist, neither of these conditions can ever be described as a "free market".

If Cable One does eventually lose their exclusive contract with Fargo, the bolded sentence above will be a big reason why. Erecting barriers to entry like this backfire in the long-run.

I have no problem playing hardball to a point. Obviously, you don't want anyone taking advantage of you. But the fact that the fall sports season has started and this deal still isn't done tells me that someone is simply refusing to budge on anything. Since Midcontinent has successfully negotiated deals with other cable companies, but not Cable One, that would seem to point to Cable One as the main culprit. But that is just pure speculation; it could be Midcontinent or it could be both of them. Again, the main remedy for this is for UND fans in Fargo to contact Cable One and tell them what you want. Nothing else will have much impact on anybody.

I don't think we realized how special that 2001 season in the Alerus Center really was until those times were gone with the transition to FCS. Maybe this weekend will be a new beginning for us.

Where have I ever said that Midco should "give away" anything? Please do not put words in my mouth (and that goes for everybody else on this thread). Midcontinent should sell the rights to Cable One for whatever price they end up negotiating. The only point I have been trying to make is that both entities are trying to get 100% of what they want from each other. That never happens, I don't think it's even possible. And in the end, it's the customer (a.k.a. the people that ultimately pay the bills) that gets used as a pawn. Do you think Ralph Engelstad ever negotiated with the idea that he would get 100% of what he wanted from a potential partner and would walk away if he didn't get it? I say no. I say if he had, he wouldn't have been as successful in Las Vegas and we wouldn't have the $104 million arena bearing his name. I think Ralph even said he wanted to get out of the casino business because he tired of all the long legal contracts and liked it better when deals were sealed with a simple handshake. And please don't think I am a shill for Cable One; I have a buddy in Fargo that HATES Cable One and has said if he couldn't have a dish, he would just go without anything. I think their monopoly is bad for customers and I think it's only a matter of time before it is done away with, no matter what happens with this deal. There are just too many people in Fargo that want a choice in cable providers for it not to happen eventually. I am not promoting "altruism", I am promoting free market competition so that those of us paying ever-increasing monthly cable bills can vote with our wallets and influence what programming is offered to them. Cable One is just one example of how large, powerful, monopolistic companies are insulated from the natural consequences of marketplace competition and can just screw over whomever they want whenever they want. You, ironically, made my point for me when you brought up Standard Oil. They were broken up because they were using their monopolistic position to suck up all the wealth for themselves and shut out any potential competitors. AT&T was broken up in 1982; now there are a plethora of phone providers to choose from. My ultimate point is that one or both of these cable providers are likely being stubborn with each other and are trying to get 100% of everything for themselves and that the rest of us pay the price for it. UND fans in Fargo need to call Cable One and tell them you want UND sports this season. Let your wallets do the talking.

Just happened to run across this article from the LA Times (reprinted in today's Star Tribune). This is the point I have been trying to make, that Midcontinent and Cable One shouldn't sacrifice the long-term for the short-term: Cord-cutting reality: Pay-TV industry loses 217,000 subscribers http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-pay-tv-industry-loses-subscribers-20130903,0,7983225.story Cable companies turn off potential future customers at their own peril. Of course, the customer only has leverage if they use it. Fighting Sioux fans in Fargo need to contact Cable One and tell them they want UND sports on their televisions.

Again, like I said, I am not affected by this. I live in Grand Forks and I have season tickets to football and hockey. So I don't even have a dog in the fight, I was just making an observation. And I stand by that observation. The bolded part is what is wrong with our economy today. Companies getting too big for their britches, to the point where they feel they can screw over their customers without any natural consequences. And in this case, they are taking that attitude and applying it to each other with regards to programming. There is lots of money to be made by a lot of people without putting anyone out of business. Cable One is not a threat to Midcontinent in the Upper Midwest. And Midcontinent can score points with potential, future customers in Fargo by cutting a deal with Cable One (because, sooner or later, that exclusive contract will be done away with). But we live in a short-sighted society and this is another symptom of that. But please feel free to continue accepting whatever explanation you are given. I prefer to analyze it critically and point out things that need to be pointed out. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.

I think this has less to do with being scared of UND and more to do with having trouble selling tickets after they fired their head coach for what I can only imagine are political reasons. I think they did a lot of damage to their program when they did that.

This is priceless!!!

I like it, it makes sense. Which is why it has zero chance of happening.

You should know that I am filing all the smart remarks and cheap shots you guys are throwing at us right now in my memory for future reference. When the worm turns (and it will), I will use all this stuff against you and your team. And I will not be nice about it. Just remember two things before you hit that Post button: What goes around comes around and bad karma is tough to live with.

Based on this criteria, almost any bar fight could be construed as being attempted murder. But I agree with you. We don't know the details of why they are pressing the charges they are pressing. I doubt the DA is going to overreach and embarrass herself in the process. They all want judgeships down the road.

The problem with going back outside is that a bunch of people would dump their season tickets because they have become spoiled with having football indoors. I like the idea of outdoor football (heck, I wish the Vikings would go back to that!), but our society has come to accept and expect football to be played in indoor comfort. That ship has sailed.

Okay, first of all, nobody is talking about an undefeated season. You are the first poster to even bring it up, even in jest. Second of all, there are a good number of posters (I won't call anyone out, you know who you are) who are just fine and dandy with what our FB program is right now and that everything will just fix itself over time. What some of us find disturbing is not losing games (the road to winning is often paved with tough losses), it's how we've been losing them. We have been getting blown out by 40-50 points on the road against good teams far too often. Once something negative happens on the road (a turnover, a dropped pass, a penalty) the team gets discouraged and folds like a cheap piece of lawn furniture. That is the biggest thing that worries some of us. Losses like that are bad enough on the road. Getting blown out at home would be even worse. God help us if we have recruits in the stands watching. Nobody is expecting a long playoff run. But I think people expect us to have a solid winning season with 7 games at home and no FBS money game. And if we don't accomplish that, I think Muss is definitely on the hot seat.

This is precisely why I am reluctant to give NDSU kudos on anything. They give Gopher hockey fans a run for their money on being the most obnoxious and insufferable. Alabama would roll over most of the teams in the Big 12, so all this talk about how NDSU could match up with them is just insane. The SEC is a whole football universe by itself.

Well, the B1G has instituted what I like to call "The Minnesota Rule" because the Gophers couldn't beat teams like USD and NDSU at home. I wouldn't be surprised if other conferences did the same thing. Losing games to FCS schools is an embarrassment that most programs don't want to have to explain to deep-pocketed athletic boosters and potential blue chip recruits. As for UND getting to the top of FCS, that will require beating good FCS teams. With seven home games this year, this is the perfect time to establish ourselves.

That is correct. And you can bet that Duke compares itself to North Carolina and vise versa. Same with Louisville and Kentucky. Same with Arizona and Arizona State. And the same with UND and NDSU. And as long as both schools have athletics at the same level of competition, those comparisons will continue to be made.

I agree with you, but the problem is that a lot of our fans don't think our football program has "a long ways to go!". They are happy with being close to a winning season last year. I am on the fence about Mussman and his staff and I think they can still build a winner. But this season is huge for the current regime and will help determine whether they are ultimately successful or not.

Good post Johnny. First Bison fan that I have seen say anything good about UND hockey (or UND anything, for that matter).