Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

UND-FB-FAN

Members
  • Posts

    10,229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    86

Posts posted by UND-FB-FAN

  1. 18 minutes ago, Blackheart said:

    Yeah, but don't confuse him with facts.

    Me not being factual? That's a good one. You maintain your regional bubble thoughts and I'll continue my beliefs that just happen to parallel those of the entire country. Good luck. 

    Go UND

  2. 21 minutes ago, UNDMOORHEAD said:

    Weren't you the one who started down this road?

    No, I wasn't. If folks on here would actually read comprehensively, there would be an understanding of my stance. Instead, people try to take a reading shortcut and, subsequently, the topic becomes incredibly derailed. 

     

  3. 6 hours ago, southpaw said:

    Pretty awkward when a UND football fan brings up a choke job about another team...

    Who said we were comparing UND programs? Nevertheless, do what you must to maintain your false reality. This is a thread about the new logo - keep it that way. 

    • Upvote 1
  4. 5 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

    I saw lots of "progress" in the Scheels Arena Friday................

    Oh please dont make me delve into your perception (although I suspect I know what it is).

    There certainly was plenty of outdated nickname apparel in Scheels Arena on Friday.

  5. 10 hours ago, Cratter said:

    I've yelled "Go Hawks" for Shts and giggles at a UND hockey games this year (during a quiet period in play) knowing I'd get a rise from someone and sure enough every time someone would yell "Go Sioux" at me.

    I think a unison "Go Hawks" chant at the Ralph is years away.

    Yes, that level of protest and denial is definitely there. This divide within the University community will cause issues for some time, despite what some delusionists on this board think. It is subtle, yes, but disunited nonetheless. The direct influence of the nickname on winning and losing is being blown out of proportion by many as apparently they feel that is a logical rebuttal; it isn't - the divide continues to disrupt irregardless of direct W/L results. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  6. 15 hours ago, Blackheart said:

    What part of the game yesterday was a choke job?  Talk about being disconnected from reality.

    Perception is reality, my friend. You perceive protest as progress, unfortunately.

    Time to move on. UND Fighting Hawks Hockey essentially lost a home tournament game that many expected them to win. That happens, sometimes; hopefully 2017-18 is better. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  7. 15 hours ago, Blackheart said:

    Not sounding like much of a UND fan.  Or maybe you need someone to explain the game to you?  I'm guessing a little of both.

    I'm certainly a UND fan/alumnus/booster/season ticket holder, etc., but that doesn't make me a fan of your average "UND fan". It is what it is. Hopefully time can bring some to reality. 

  8. 36 minutes ago, bigskyvikes said:

    You call yourself a UND fan making a comment like that?! You're a POS as far as I'm concerned! 

    What choke job happened?

    More time wasted on a waste of skin!

    Neither I nor anyone else for that matter requires your validation. Nice try, though.

    I want nothing to do with the "UND fans" you speak of. My years of association with UND validates my relationship with the University completely independent of your classless comments. 

    Were you the one giving "the bird" on tv after UND lost? 

    If the nickname change can ignite this sort of behavior, then, well, the "UND fans" you speak of need to take a hard, long look at themselves in the mirror. 

     

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  9. 27 minutes ago, bigskyvikes said:

    Jesus...Is there anyway I can get the wasted time I lost reading this?

    No, but for future reference you can learn to read faster. 

    Too bad all those "Sioux Forever" chants at Scheels Arena today couldn't prevent the choke job. 

    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 14
  10. 1 hour ago, UND-1 said:

    Bubba and staff got theirs.  Jones and staff are up next.

    Bubba and staff are still grossly underpaid. Check out the going rate of similar area schools (e.g., NDSU, SDSU, USD, Montana, Montana State). 

    UND has plenty of work to do with their football and basketball programs in terms of salary and subsequent competitiveness. I've been around enough DI college athletics in this country to know those are the ones that matter to the masses. 

  11. 9 minutes ago, MafiaMan said:

    So football and womens hockey fans were and/or are staying away as a form of protest over the nickname and logo?  C'mon!

    Likely not in great numbers, but you're quite unaware of the various claims and protest threats, if you will, that have been put out there if you're doubting what I'm suggesting. FSF fans have, shall we say, a special mindset. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  12. 1 hour ago, MafiaMan said:

    So Recruit X would be concerned about the potential nickname identity crisis between Sioux and Hawks but would not be worried about Bye-son vs Byzz-zon?

    :silly:

    You think recruits love hearing boos when "Fighting Hawks" is mentioned over the loudspeakers or enjoy seeing empty seats because folks felt they would somehow be helping UND by boycotting UND athletics due to the new nickname? 

    16-, 17-, and 18-year old kids aren't complete robots; they will take into account both the passion and the ridiculousness of each prospective fan base. 

    Recruits aren't invested in the past nickname like some think they somehow should be. Many current recruits were 12 years old when UND was last officially referred to as the Fighting Sioux.

    Recruits and current student-athletes want "fans" to unanimously buy in because the players and coaches certainly have; the only possible exception to this is the hockey program due to some residual poison. 

    • Upvote 3
    • Downvote 6
  13. 4 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

    You do realize you researched waxing/waning moon schedules to disprove a joke?

    I forgot to include when one of said team's players has a c- in a communications class. Back to your research... :lol:  

     

    11 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    Save your mind; good ol' fashion tomfoolery at work. 

    Yes. I even went as far as to try and save someone's "blown mind" as an aside. 

    You're welcome, @Ray77

    • Upvote 1
  14. 1 minute ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

    I'm flattered that you actually went back and checked moon schedules. I can picture you typing furiously at your computer muttering to yourself:

    "2016, 2000, 1997, 1987...sonofabitch.... AHA!! Although everything else checked out, 1963 trips your argument up. Checkmate!!

     

    One minute of my life I will never get back ...

    No room for error with "facts", although these days that is lost on some figures. 

    • Downvote 1
  15. 14 minutes ago, Taz Boy said:

    If Recruit X actually thinks that way, then I fear they may struggle to maintain academic eligibility, even at the NDSCC.

    Right, because the hypothetical choice he ended up making was quite telling of his academic ability ...  

    ... but in all seriousness, that doesn't suggest academic proficiency. Fan base characteristics are repeated over and over again during recruiting; well known. 

    • Downvote 1
  16. 3 hours ago, MafiaMan said:

    Scholarship Athlete X:  You know, now that we've resolved this nickname issue, I'm going to stop half-a**ing it out there and give 100% in 2016-2017!  

    Yea, that's not how it happened...

    In contrast ...

    Potential Scholarship Athlete X aka Recruit X: I have an offer from both UND and NDSU (let's say Wisconsin for hockey), but since most of UND's fan base is now hostile towards itself with the Fighting Hawks nickname, I think I'm definitely going to attend NDSU (Wisconsin) where everyone is uniformly prideful and not hostile towards mere nickname beliefs. 

    Everything is considered and weighed when there are options in recruiting. 

    • Downvote 4
  17. 4 hours ago, UND-1 said:

    Nope, it was a complete, 100% coincidence.  All of those things were happening no matter what.  

     

    That is possible, but there certainly is no way to know for sure. It's all theoretical. Fact is UND won everything it has won in the past year while being known as the Fighting Hawks.

    Also a fact, not a belief: UND as just "North Dakota" did not win an NCAA hockey championship, did not make the DI NCAA men's basketball tournament and did not make the FCS football playoffs.

     

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 3
  18. 8 hours ago, Sioux94 said:

    If we didn't come back and beat Weber and make it to the dance, would this thread still be called Fire Jones?   Wouldn't surprise me if it was, and many would say he stinks and we need to get rid of him.  But a great comeback by the team in the conference championship game and within minutes he is one of the best FCS coaches and we need to keep him.  Gotta love fan bases sometimes.  I wonder if a Fire Berry thread will be started if he doesn't get us another Natty this year.  

    All great points, but obviously the competency and work ethic of coaches makes a significant difference in the competitive advantage of DI collegiate basketball. If there really was no argument there, then the average salary of DI men's basketball coaches wouldn't be over $1 million (http://work.chron.com/average-salary-college-basketball-coach-2102.html). That is, if coaches were just a nice ornament on the sideline relative to the "real difference makers" on the court, the current average investment in coaching salary wouldn't exist. Further complicating the issue is UND has overall underpaid its DI head coaches (even Brian Jones) which has implied UND does not value winning in men's basketball (thus Jones has coached for over a decade at UND with a losing record). I am not saying that any level of coach criticism is warranted, but a certain degree of criticism is more than fair, in my opinion. If UND could have afforded to pay a men's basketball coach over $200k a couple years ago (priorities were elsewhere), then Jones would have already been gone. Jones NOW deserves an extension with a raise, along with an assistant coaching salary pool increase. 

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...