yzerman19

we're just not going to see eye to eye, That's okay. Hope to see you next weekend for a Sioux sweep

Siouxboys appears to be a bit of a Troll. Poking the bear.... let it go, son. let it go.

bottom line- you call it for Bucky, you gotta call it for us. The inconsistency makes it worse. I can live with the call, if it goes both ways

fair...first reasonable explanation I can consider

my Gopher degrees

doesn't tell it. doesn't show difference between the two

judgment is the driver of the calls both ways...I get paid for judgment...lots...well more than GFHockey...call it consistent. Have good judgment. For the record, I have 2 degrees from Minnesota. It is not green glasses.

So, we go 2-1-1 vs Pig10 hockey vs two of their best...that bodes well for PWR

all you ever ask of the refs is to be consistent...

give me a rule...I'm waiting.....

right!!!! so...........

why would you jump in? Seriously...after 14 years, I am now done with this site. Bye...sorry Jim

So, I'll accept that IFF they call that both ways...I never saw that as a penalty shot

That was a peace offering....you are obtuse..

good. why just start posting recently?

general rule has always been space between defender and attacker, not just no defender between the attacker and the net

have you ever played at a reasonably high level or coached...i played junior A and am USA hockey certified as a coach

I would not. Penalty shot should be awarded if a clear breakaway is stopped by a penalty, not a partial breakaway

get out of your mom's basement

i have played and coached hockey...i would never call that a penalty shot

was the player in the clear and pulled down from behind with no ability of the defender to play the puck? He was not, he was caught, and Bowen even made a play on the puck.

you clearly know nothing about hockey

this ^^^^^^

yup- he's no pony