siouxfan512

yep my bad, thought he said ladue first. Hard to keep up with these guys, they are terrible

Weak weak weak penalty on ladue

Rhett!

Very disappointed that I haven't seen a floating tiger head yet.

would be nice if they had replay

Go Nodaks!

I'll take it, I would love to see Nodaks in the top 2. I really think it is the best option, and I hope it wins. Though if Nodaks, can't overcome Roughriders, then I'll vote for Roughriders over Hawks. I just can't vote for something as generic as a hawk. Too many of those out there.

Maybe, but remember how close the vote was between Nodaks and Roughriders. It wouldn't take too much for that to flip flop, so it could get interesting.

Well if you don't like Nodaks, then we don't really care what you think. So please stop posting your nonsense! Just kidding, its the beauty of everyone getting a vote. Until Kelly changes the process against to only allow certain individuals to vote. Go Nodaks!

Exactly what I was saying. Don't worry about switching votes. Just vote what you want. You can always vote a different way in the final vote.

Won't argue you there, I think we could totally use some depth, and maybe a more established transfer. I would really like to see them work Iwarri Smith in at WR, given the amount they are using him at RB. Plus if Neverman is back next year, would could use Smith's athleticism elsewhere. Heck, wasn't he a potential on defense at one point? Could he play safety? I just think since we pull the redshirt, he needs to be on the field more than he has.

I always like sitting center ice as a student. Never a fan of sitting right up against the glass, or on the ends. Give me a seat about 10-15 rows back (just above the glass) and between the blue lines. I think you get the best view of the play in each end.

but but but We can make this Nodaks vs. Fighting Hawks!

I don't think that we should necessarily say Studs isn't getting the job done, but he does need to prove that he can throw the ball more that what he has done thus far. Not saying he needs to throw for 400 yards every game, but he does need to get better at looking through his progressions and making good decisions. He has had some really nice passes this year, and some really horrendous ones.

Totally, agree with this! I don't think doing this would mean they couldn't utilize Studsrud, or find a way to work him into the game plan, but we need a competent passing game. Especially with how good our run game has been. I think our receivers are only going to get better with Dulin playing next year, and the kid from Red Wing coming in. Hopefully Luke Stanley improves too. We need someone to get these guys the ball.

Dude, you really need to work on that. I have notebooks, binders, post its, all sorts of stuff filed away on this.

True, that part of it really comes down to who voted for Sundogs and Northstars. It'll be interesting for sure. and this is all assuming that Kelly doesn't change the voting to add No Nickname or Sundogs back into the mix.

If the coaching staff really sees the need to start bartels, then go for it. BUT based on his recent performance I hope he has a pretty short leash, and that they are willing to pull the trigger on Mollberg.

Looking forward to the floating tiger head

While I fully support anyone who wants to move into the Nodak camp .... in reality, there is no reason to start switching votes at this point. Not when there is going to be a 3rd vote.

Do it!

I would hope so, but I agree, I never though fighting hawks was even going to be in the mix. I'm still holding out hope for Nodaks!

Exactly! There is no reason to overthink this, or try to be strategic or anything. Vote for what you want. If your vote choice doesn't make it to the final vote, you can always change it up then.

It will be interesting to see the reallocation of the Sundogs and Northstars voters, especially with Nodaks and Roughriders being so close. Will Roughriders pull away or will Nodaks end up taking the lead. Essentially, this votes seem like it is more to determine the favorite between Nodaks and Roughriders. It will then be intersting to see if enough people switch between those two names in the final vote. I know I'm voting Nodaks, but I would much rather see Roughriders than Fighting Hawks. I still think there is a good chance that Fighting Hawks does not win this.

I'm still voting Nodaks, but if Nodaks doesn't make the final cut, then i'll vote Roughriders. Need to remember the votes between nodaks and roughriders were close, and there are still a fair number of votes to be reallocated from the sundogs and North Stars groups. This votes seems to.be more to determine who is in the final vote between nodaks and roughriders. After that I still think either one has a shot against fighting hawks.