siouxfan512
-
Posts
7,846 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
47
Everything posted by siouxfan512
-
I really did like when the Vermont play by play crew used Nodaks this past weekend. I though it sounded pretty darn good. I know that was hockey, but I think it could be used just as well for football, basketball, etc. I could cope with Roughriders too, and I think there would be some pretty cool logo options there. Please please please no fighting hawks. Sure there could be some decent logo options, but we're basically just blending in with every other boring bird/hawk/eagle school out there.
-
Always the logical view Jim. I think we can all agree that UND and Kelley are definitely not going to win any ethics awards with this process. However, seeing as we (the voters) are at the mercy of the process (whatever process that happens to be), I'm really hoping for two more votes. I'll go Nodaks with the first, and the second (if it is still available). Otherwise I'll go Nodaks then Roughriders. Not a fan of fighting hawks at all.
-
Agree, I really hope it plays out that way, because I will be voting as follows Nodaks, Roughriders, Fighting Haws: I pick Nodaks Nodaks, Roughriders: I pick Nodaks Nodaks, Fighting Hawks: I pick Nodaks Roughriders, Fighting Hawks: I pick Roughriders If there is one vote left, I see Fighting Hawks winning. If there are two votes left, I see either Nodaks or Roughriders winning.
-
I voted for Nodaks, and I plan on voting that way again. Though if if Roughriders were to win, I could definitely get on board with a logo like this. Unfortunately, Fighting Hawks is looking like it will lead the way, which is pretty unfortunate give how boring and incredibly bland it is. Sad to see us go from such a great name and great logo to just another boring name. At least Nodaks and Roughriders were unique.
-
hideous logo
-
So we all know this entire process has been a joke since day one, but the bottom line is there are now 3 options on the ballot. How does this play out going forward? I was surprised to see fighting hawks with the most votes, but I don't really see that changing in the final vote. With these three, I'll vote nodaks. Had nodaks been left off, I would have voted roughriders Go Nodaks!
-
how are noak people easily swayed?
-
gross. Nothing like a bland option similar to the transition Of every other native American team. It is what it is, but I was definitely surprised at how many people voted for that one.
-
Not even going to comment on the process right now. I think I've said my piece on that in the past. Nevertheless, Go Nodaks.
-
trying to find out so I can find it on ihesrt radio. 96.3?
-
What radio station is the game on?
-
I think it is fair to say that none of our QBs are really studs at the position. I think everyone had really high hopes for Mollberg when he came in (I know I did), just given the caliber of the competition that was looking at him. To be fair to Mollberg, he may have not started last year off great, but lets remember that we were also implementing a new coach and a new system. I would still rather see Mollber over Bartels, and I have pretty much always felt this way. I think Bartels has a strong arm, and throws a nice deep ball on occasion, but I'm just not sold on the guy. I definitely questioned started Keaton this year, mainly because he was so young and didn't have as much game experience. I think that proved to be a wise decision, given the coaches system and how good Keaton is in the run game. Again, I don't think any of these guys are very strong starting QBs, and I really hope the coaches are going to be able to lockup a good recruit going forward. (Maybe Heidlebaugh is the guy, but I don't know much about him). I'm not closing the door on Studrud either, like I said, he is young, but he has a lot of work to do in developing his passing game. Learning to work through his progressions, and improving some decision making.
-
There will need to be a run off between Nodaks and Roughriders. President Kelly throws a curveball and adds University of North Dakota/No Nickname back into the mix 3 days prior to the vote, President Kelly will retract this option for reason best known to himself. 2 days prior to the vote President Kelly will announce he will re-consider using University of North Dakota/No Nickname on the ballot 1 day prior to the vote President Kelly will announce the run off vote will NOT includes University of North Dakota/No Nickname. Run off vote will be split exactly 50/50 President Kelly announces that going forward the school will be known as the University of Nodak Fighting SunRider Stars. A logo has yet to be determined, but it will involve rainbows. jk, I want Nodaks, but I think it will be Roughriders in a close one.
-
Pretty ironic to call UND fans (including his own friends) a classless bunch, then write this trash. If he really had a point to make, it was lost in all the garbage.
-
Haha, you must have busted open the special bottle tonight. Best question ever, and I really have NO answer for you. I love my (Fighting Sioux) hockey team, but absolutely can't disrespect what the bison have done in the past several season.
-
Alright, I think we ALL need to chill out. Realistically, going forward, we WILL BE the Roughriders, Nodaks or Fighting Hawks. Lets all deal with that and get ready for it. Right now, our fanbase (at least on this forum) could be considered laughable the way we are going at each other. We all support the same, school, teams, players, etc .... Might as well get ready to support whatever name comes out of this dumb process. We are the same fan base .... lets act like it.
-
I just saw Santiago was listed as a top 5 FCS freshman. Pretty awesome recognition, and (fumbles aside) well deserved. Most explosive back we have had since Chappell. Really excited to see what this kid will be in the next few years. However, UND needs to get those uniforms to match those helmets next season. Really the helmets looks great and the jerseys look great. We just need them to match. I hope to see the jersey color lighten up to match our helmets.
-
^This ..... The reasoning behind these votes really doesn't matter. Everyone gets their vote, that's it. I find fighting hawks incredibly bland. Not a fan of it, but if that is what people vote for, and it wins, then so be it.
-
Not sure, I didn't go to RR, and even so. I think we are all aware of how immature student age kids can be. Including our own student. Bottom line is, any and every name will get made fun of in some way. Do you think if we are the Roughriders, nobody will find some type of improper or repulsive name? I see Roughriders winning a close race, though Nodaks has a chance. Either way, lets just go with it. Hell either way, I'll be wearing my Sioux jerseys to the hockey games, and I'll probably wear my old sioux shirts to the football games. Who cares? Maybe I'll buy a Roughrider or Nodak hat. I don't know, but I think we may need to chill out a bit. I don't even read the herald much. I don't live in GF.
-
I think its pretty sad that you are already making fun of what could very well be the new name. I get not liking it, but you are throwing every random reason out there to bash on whomever votes for it, just because you don't like it, and it is actually in contention. Will it win? I don't know, we'll see, but why chastise the people who vote for it. You think opponents won't find other reasons to make fun of us? All fanbases do it, including us. Nodaks - Nodicks Fighting Hawks - Fighting Hicks Sundogs - Enough said, makes fun of it self Roughriders - they'll throw condoms at us, make obscene signs, etc North Stars - Just let the MN crowd have a field day with it. Gophers - Goofers, Golden Chokers The point is, rather than chastising those that you don't agree with your specific vote, lets all accept the name will probably by Roughriders or Nodaks .... possibly Fighting Hawks, and just get ready to accept one of those. Will it stop you from supporting UND? Will you support them, but always antagonize the name if it isn't what you want? If you really hate Nodaks, then just stick with UND or Sioux, or North Dakota. Hell call them Roughriders if you really want ... but lets not bash every person for voting something different, just because it doesn't align with your own personal view.
-
University of north dakota fighting nodaks
siouxfan512 replied to fightingsioux08's topic in UND Nickname
I'm not trying to deny anything. I already said I don't think any of the names are good, but I though Nodaks was the best of the choices given. And even if it is similar to North Dakota, and that is someone's choice for voting for it, who cares? Thats we we all get a vote ... because we all have an opinion. Don't get me wrong, I think voting for Sundogs is ridiculous, but if someone really thinks that is the best option, then thats why they get to vote. I guess I don't understand if you are criticizing "Nodaks", or peoples individual reasons for voting for it. Truth is, it doesn't matter. At the end of this, there will be a new name, and we'll all just have to live with it. -
For the record, I always wanted Mollberg over Bartels. I've really never been impressed with him.
-
University of north dakota fighting nodaks
siouxfan512 replied to fightingsioux08's topic in UND Nickname
Why do you automatically assume that is the sole reason anyone would choose Nodaks? Couldn't possibly be because they don't like the remaining options? Personally I don't like any of them I don't like Nodaks the least. Sounds to me like you just don't like Nodaks, and you're pissed off that enough people do like it that it may actually win. While that is understandable, grouping everyone reasoning together and accusing their votes of being made in bitterness is a little unnecessary. Do you plan to stop supporting the teams or programs if they become the Nodaks? I know I won't retract my support if they are the Roughriders, even if that wasn't my vote. Might be time to chill out a bit, this vote isn't exactly ideal for anyone. -
Because you like watching the push ups, or because our football team used to score so many points?
-
I agree. If Studsrud was ready, he should be in. I think Bartels and Mollbers are somewhat interchangable, but give what we have seen in the past I still give Joe the edge. I think Bartels has shown just how limited he is. I think he has a good strong arm, and every once in a while will hit the deep ball; but this offense does not, and can not, live on the deep pass. I just think we have seen what he has and Joe would give us a better chance to win.
