-
Posts
8,075 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
67
Everything posted by stoneySIOUX
-
You hit it on the head when it comes to the consistency and I definitely understand that's a big part of why people are so frustrated. I guess I am just doing my best to stay positive and the boys wholly answered the call tonight in a large part of what we talked about in this thread. The recruiting portion of the discussion is a different discussion all together. This is the team we have right now and that team on the ice played pretty dang well tonight. They showed it again that they can hang with the best of em when they play like they did tonight. It has to continue if we want to be watching our team come mid March. Stay in the moment, SiouxSports. We won a game tonight for the first time in awhile and again, this should give us hope. Cheers to it continuing!
-
Kind of lame there's still so much action in this thread after a 5-1 win tonight. So much trashing of this team from Friday and deservedly so, but look back at everything that was ripped on in this thread... Tonight... Thome started and played well, Mismash scored and had an assist, JJ scored twice, we netted two PPGs and Bubbs had the 19-22-14 line together and two of them scored... We got everything we asked for in this thread pertaining to this season tonight and this is still going. Cheers, boys. Nice win TONIGHT. Still controlling our own destiny.
-
NORTH DAKOTA VS. c.c. SATURDAY GAMEDAY THREAD
stoneySIOUX replied to iluvdebbies's topic in Men's Hockey
Said this to a couple buddies tonight that we've shown the past two weeks, and for the most part all year, we are pretty good defensively. Just need some goals. Need Mash to play like he did tonight the rest of the year. He can be our catalyst. Two leaders with goals and two others who we need to chip in, did it. Good stuff. -
NORTH DAKOTA VS. c.c. SATURDAY GAMEDAY THREAD
stoneySIOUX replied to iluvdebbies's topic in Men's Hockey
#FireHaviland? Simple question. -
I can do that for big games, but not BSU in January haha.
-
Totally forgot about both of those things.
-
Have we had an ENG this year? I'd looooove to see 2 this weekend for us
-
I agree with that. I was just kind of defending who Johnny is as a player. Yup. I agree with this.
-
Osweiler point it solid, but it's just the Niners saying they want him long term and believe in him, I think.
-
Great point.
-
I agree with all of this.
-
That's a fair point. But, down 1 on a team who doesn't score in general, he's going to for sure be a responsible player.
-
Let's go. I'm loving the optimism in the last couple of days around here. Just win, baby. We really do control our own destiny. 4-2 good guys in green Wooly, Adams, Gersich and Rhett
-
Hahaha this is funny ..... And sad.
-
And that's not his role.
-
He's not a top-6 player on our team when we have our best two best centers healthy. Simonson plays his role as good as anyone on the team -- two-way and being responsible. He's not a scorer. Every team needs this type of player. Do we maybe have too many of this type of player in the pipeline right now? Maybe. But, we definitely need players like Johnny (Senden could fill this role) to be on our team going forward.
-
He's helping us with recruiting now, but yes, I miss him and I'm always asking "what-if" he'd stayed.
-
And if we don't sweep, we blame Schlossman, right? Right!
-
This means the most to me... match up that top group with Wooly, Pooly, Gardner, Pogo and whomever else is on this line and I think we can wear this team down.
-
I'm just very confused on how we are running our narratives around here hahaha.
-
It's simply a progression of talent. Has nothing to do with him being like Brady or where he played, he was just the next young franchise type QB that was due for a contract. He took over Stafford's spot on the list. Next, it'll be Luck then so on and so forth.
-
Wait, but we're always interested when he picks a split.... we're so confusing on here.
-
Schlossy picked a sweep.... so, um... narrative? What do we do now? PANIC?!?! http://undhockey.areavoices.com/?p=111069
-
Wait, what page are we in?