Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

stoneySIOUX

Members
  • Posts

    8,090
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68

Everything posted by stoneySIOUX

  1. Your context is that it's a normal comparison, but the USPS vs. FH logo is done as a mockery, is what I'm trying to say. That vs. the UND/ND logo is completely different. You changed the subject, albeit I think unintentionally.
  2. Lol wat? You're comparing the discussion and similarities between two actual logos versus one actual logo and a logo used to mock an actual logo. At the end of the day, the FH and Post Office logo comparison is dumb, too. Is there a similarity? Sure. But I sure don't think of USPS when I see the FH logo.
  3. But.... but... I'm not embarrassed, so uh, that's not a real thing lol. My "waste of time and energy" is merely those spent on here, discussing this with you folk.
  4. I just don't get why people are so butthurt that it causes embarrassment. Those mocking us are our rivals. Didn't they already try and mock us? My pride in my school is not overshadowed by name calling.
  5. Another one who gets embarrassed easily lol. Do you guys have meetings? I'd like to observe.
  6. Again, settle down. To think we are the laughing stock of college sports is so silly.
  7. Settle down. Our school is in North Dakota, a flyover state and our best sport is a niche sport. Relax. It'll make life easier.... and this is coming from a guy who still wants us to be Sioux lol.
  8. Lol if you say so, man. I think that comparison was apples and oranges, but so be it.
  9. I think what he's trying to say is that that comparison isn't exactly what I'd call "strong" or "equivalent" lol.
  10. Oops... my bad. Good catch. Edited.
  11. Some people are dumb lol.
  12. Uncalled for.... this is a logo debate, not a 17-18 team sucks debate. Keep it in the right thread, Sick
  13. No, that's not a thing lol.
  14. Lol ok then, still, do it so you can understand...
  15. Get with the Hockey Only crowd and you'll understand why this is an outlier....
  16. Haha fair point, but I think it's easier than that, especially since four of your five stated pluralities aren't decidedly pro-Hawks.
  17. And they are both strong words. To each, their own.
  18. And it never will. My personal personification of what a Minnesota Gopher hockey player looks like . It's actually gotten better... it used to be a picture of Jay Barribal . *cold shiver*
  19. I apparently missed that part. And that seems like a reasonable ask. Looking forward to the tit-for-tat ending, at some point.
  20. I agree with this. With that said, I still think the majority (large majority) still would rather wait and the REA board is doing what I'd think the majority wants them to do whether that's the reason for doing so, or not.
  21. Had someone tell me this recently and it would make sense... Miami just pilfered Omaha like crazy, so they now have extra spots and money to spend. Makes complete sense. He'll jump right into a Top 6 role.
  22. Hodgson stated in the emails Siouxperfan7 sent over.
  23. No, but slowly integrating it. I disagree that they don't want them as a fanbase, because at that point, they wouldn't have the logo anywhere, ever. They are using the logo, just not as much as you'd like. Sorry.
  24. Fair, but tough comparison. One side... doing what's best for the collective (and yes, I agree that's what they are doing).... the other .... we don't like the logo and don't want it. The majority group is serving themselves, right or wrong. I'm pickin' up what you're puttin' down, jdub. I'm just saying that the REA is simply trying to not alienate the largest group.
×
×
  • Create New...