stoneySIOUX

Ok, so who wants to give lines a shot? I can give my $.02 Mismash - Jones - Gooch JJ - Gardner - Weatherby Smith - Hoff - Hain Adams - Bowen - Johnson Poolman - Shaw JBD - Tychonick Bast - Kierstad Extras: Yon, Keane, Senden (MAN, what an embarrassment of riches on D! Rieger and Peski siting?) Thome Scheel Bob

Hoping to see the Mismash, Jones, Kawaguchi line take off next year and really click. Maybe try out Weatherby with JJ and Gardner.

Of course he was lol. That's what he does.

Sounds like the Dave Hakstol era.

I think we can get three years from both. I guess, I hope. UND being really, really competitive in year 2 and 3 should keep both very interested.

Actually, I'd think one of them leaving would encourage the other to stay as that means one less spot, you know?

It's maddening. I just don't understand how they can think this will do anything but give MJ a leg up by showing kids that college hockey isn't paying attention.

It was a quote from the lawsuit. Has nothing to do with the writer.

I was telling a buddy this... I've literally NEVER seen this without an injury. Supposedly it has to do with Sano getting more 1-on-1 instruction since ST HQ is down there, but the optics sure are bad.

Good god, man. He's a character lol.

More offensive upside than Gabe? Yes please lol.

I'm no Commie, but I frickin' love this anthem. Probably because of my affinity for Rocky IV.

Ah, heck. Man, I remember seeing legends like DaveK rolling around when I was a kid and I thought, one day. One day I can win it. My family. Mom.... *looks into the camera* thanks for driving me to the rink every day. Dad... thanks for being my coach and pushing me. I'm just speechless.

You know, the guys. They guys just came to work every day. Lunch pail mentality.

The guys.... they just. They just gave it everything they had. Every minute. Every shift. All out on the ice. What can I say? I'm speechless

You know... it's... uh... it's been a long time coming. *sighs deep while looking up at the rafters* We worked so hard to get to this point and now that we're here, it's ... It's just incredible.

Bingo. It's a talker... use this forum as evidence.

I've stated it many times and I'm absolutely not missing anything... the point of the story was that UND could have zero female HCs. The context was the Ark-PB stat. You're asking for additional context, which is completely fine, but unnecessary to the point of the story. It makes absolutely no difference if a school is "barely" better and honestly, I've also said many times that I don't even care about this as an issue. Call it clickbait, that's completely fine. Your opinion, man! My defense was on the initial problem that several on here were pointing to some sort of an anti-UND bias for writing that story and I'll gladly defend Schlossman on that as that is nonsense. I also don't find this story lazy, whatsoever.

Come on, man. Her contract is up very soon and she's not coming back. UND not having a female HC is a talking point in this day and age. We get it. You don't think it's a story. You just have to realize that in fact, in this day and age, this is a story.

A projection to sell papers. So be it C'mon a UND recruit had the most pull ups at the NHL combine. That's pretty cool, IMO. Plus, it's great that it indirectly takes a swipe at the Gophers!

Schlossman absolutely provided context. I said it before, the story was that UND could soon not have a female HC. That is the story. The context is that UND would then become one of two schools in the NCAA with no female HC. What part of that story has a fact that is irrelevant and what part makes it unfair? He counted all pull ups in the combine in a story about a UND recruit doing the most pull ups. Just like he counted the two NCAA schools who have (could have) no female HCs. I don't understand why anyone is making a stink about this other than the idea that it's not a big deal that UND has no female HCs. Saying NDSU only has two does nothing to change the fact that UND has (could have) zero. This story was done to sell papers (and get clicks) and that is what the Herald does.

Again, I'd highly doubt WH was 15-20% of his job. Very highly doubt. It's been heavily implied, and actually by some, specifically stated, that the Herald and Schlossman wrote that article to spite UND and that makes no sense.

Much better

Gross

Hahaha, CLEARLY. Got it. Sure, he did plenty of work for WH, ok, so I'll concede that it affected him at least a bit, but to what extent did it affect him professionally when WH was cut? Do you think he was docked pay? Did he become less busy? Less valuable? You're kidding yourself. Anyway, what is your point? Are you trying to continue this theory that he is doing this to "get back" at UND or are you just trying to show how much you think Schlossman spent working on WH, just for fun? Lol