Why? You keep repeating that players have a better chance at going pro by staying at UND but that's just not true. This school has zero recent history of putting multiple players in the NFL or CFL.
Go to Iowa, make some money, get a degree, and if you have the chance to keep playing then great. If not, you've got more money and a degree from a more well-known school.
Karl was a full time assistant from 2019-2025. Name one incoming freshman goalie that he recruited during that time who left UND significantly better than when they arrived.
Davos heading into their fifth game in five days while the USCS on their second in four and fourth in six.
Will be interesting to see who they play in net. Assuming Gajan is over his minor injury, I'd expect him to go.
Nobody said it's great programming, but go ahead and pretend that's the case if it hurts your feelings less.
It costs ESPN virtually nothing to show that content. It costs ESPN money to crew and broadcast college hockey but essentially gain no more viewers.
College hockey does not bring significant viewership numbers.
Sure.... a state with open records laws decided to forego those to hire a backdoor replacement and are trusting high-school kids to keep it a secret.
That also assumes the AD isn't feeding information to the local media on a regular basis. There's a reason you see the Herald with articles ready to go after announcements.
It's not that hard to understand. Those shows make more money for ESPN than broadcasting college hockey.
The production quality and announcers needed toto move a game from ESPN+ to a linear channel does not equate to advertising dollars due to viewers.
Clearly there is some agreement by at least one admin because take a look at the Other Sports section now.
You can actually find the relevant other topics.
But her new thread today in the UND Men's Basketball thread is a perfect example. "How did the UND Men's Basketball Team Do As of Late?" is a great topic to include in the 25-26 Season thread - where there could be additional actual conversation. And, if we're lucky, one of her blogs will spur great discussion about the 25-26 season, so doesn't it make sense that we'd want that included in the 25-26 season thread?
It's a mixture of wanting a cleaner experience when trying to find certain threads while actually giving her blog more visibility by including her posts in the main threads themselves.
That's quite the jump.
What part of the below gives you the idea that I'd like for her to be banned?
@Und Princess has a blog post about the awards for Volleyball and Soccer teams? Go ahead and post those in the specific 2025 volleyball and 2025 soccer threads. It could build conversation about the post rather than a separate thread for each individual blog post.
It also helps when people have her blocked so that they can easily skip over the posts, since threads started by blocked users are not hidden.