Oxbow6

<screaming> 99% of the people involved in this process could not care less about GF, GFRR or GFC. Can we please...please...stop bringing that up as it pertains to this process. <popping a handful of beta blockers>

Badass......hence your nickname submission of "Gleeful Unicorns" when this party started.

My question is where is the voice and common sense of the students athletes, past and present, on this committee?...minus Karl as he seems to be all about "intangible" names at this point. Seriously.....they OK with current or future athletes at UND being known as Sundogs? Fighting Green? Green Hawks? Pride?

Logic left the room when a "yes" vote came forth for Artic Blaze, Blizzard Dogs, Storm, Wings and Big Green (just to name a few) to comprise the 64 finalists. You are asking that some actual thought procees that would include reasoning would need to take place in your scenario above..........won't happen!

Why shouldn't they be? This whole process has been embarrassing from day 1.

FYI for those in Fargo.......Fleet Farm is having a class on Monday, June 15 for obtain a Conceal and Carry permit for $50.00.

In Mauer we tru.......... Nevermind.

Go Hawks!

Wasn't that 6 committees ago?

If that is the case I won't even bother voting.

So which do you perfer......Red Cocks or Green Cocks? Simple question.................

I'm definitely in the wrong career field................. If the nickname is ultimately (any color) Hawks I'll be so disapppointed.

This is what happens when you are in your 7th year at RRHS............and still classified as just a Jr.

Then you know zero about marketing.

Swiper.......well played my friend...well played!

If wearing a paper bag over your head counts.............then I'm guessing yes.

And that picture in and of itself is why I'm ok with it.

Least it will make ordering at Taco Bell at 2 AM easier..........................

Screw Dora............we want Boots!

To say I'm surprised by Karl and his approach, thoughts and comments as to this nickname issue is an understatement. I thought he would have been one not to be dragged down the road of the "intangible choices".

We will agree to disagree. His race in this process trumps his political ideology and correctness. To think otherwise is silly IMO.

Hawks of any kind is very original and the committee should be appauded for their diligence if one of those is chosen. Well played. Force is in my backyard. Spirit.....lame. Sundogs..........the original smoldering pile of ______. No thanks. So really we have 4 IMO.

The bold and underlined opinion of yours is nearsighted at best. Russ was put on that committee for a reason and it wasn't because of his personal political ideology...to think that is quite naive. To your last sentence you are correct.....unless you are NA. Stop by Leigh Jeanotte's office for clarification if you want.

This...^^^. Plus the fact that when a lady goes down due to a trip or push she doesn't go down like she was hit with a sledgehammer or shot with a gun like the men. Plus the ladies get up and don't roll around in "pain" like they are caught in a bear trap!

IMO there are 14 options......simply being North Dakota at the end of this process has zero chance. My top 3: 1) Ridas 2) Cavalry 3) Explorers I immediately excluded anything Fighting &/or Green. I then excluded any name that doesn't end in "s" as those are usually pathetically related to weather, natural occurrences or a emotional feelings. I could live with one of these 3 with Explorers a distant 3rd.