jimdahl

Go read this. I cross-spam the forums because I can. Now back to your regularly schedule forensic accounting exercises.

Go read this. I cross-spam the forums because I can. Now back to your regularly scheduled hacking into each other's accounts so you really can put words in each other's mouths.

Go read this. I cross-spam the forums because I can. Now back to your regularly scheduled Fire Hakstol discussion.

It's time for a new SiouxSports.com logo. Ideas are welcome, in thread or PM. It need not be fully developed, partial ideas or concepts are also welcome. You don't actually need to be able to render or draw it yourself (though are welcome to, if you have that ability), I'm happy to commission a professional to do the final rendering. Some guidelines: * The logo itself should be square or perhaps taller than wide. * Simple is often best. I admire USCHO's rw&b star. These guys are a little bubbly for my taste, but demonstrate the branding power of simplicity. * Should be merchandise-friendly (I like the Sitting Bull banner at the top of this page, but it's not merchandise friendly). * Cannot infringe on existing copyrights or trademarks. e.g. No UND logos or derivatives thereof. If anyone contributes an idea that I go with, you'll get not only fame, but almost certainly some logo-bearing swag.

Wow, I hate to impugn the intelligence of a first-time poster, but surely you must realize that you're on a North Dakota message board? Even if you didn't, the fact that you're posting in a hockey forum suggests that you should know that Norte [sic] Dame isn't even in the WCHA, so wouldn't have been at the Final 5. Therefore, your guessed expansion of the acronym ND looks kind of silly. Sigh. Anyway, welcome to SiouxSports.com; we hope you enjoy your stay.

Did I win?

May 16, poster with "inside information" on SiouxSports.com message board

That was the end of the MOIC's process. We had a little discussion about the start of it all here (note that the quotes are messed up in the very old messages). The process was basically launched by Saigo at SCSU; when he joined the MOIC at the NCAA, he saw an opportunity to take his anti-Sioux crusade national. Needless to say, he found a receptive audience. UND's initial reaction was to complete the mandatory self-assessment, which a lot of us thought would be the end of it all at the NCAA level.

Nothing new emerges in UND Foundation-controlled litigation fund Nothing new to see here...

The new APR Data came out two days ago. UND Men's hockey is up to 930. That's very bad, but just good enough to avoid sanctions (which kick in at 925).

I think NanoBison might be out, better make that $235,400 each.

The irony of these two sentences back-to-back is almost overwhelming.

I only watched for Haley Scarnato and Sanjaya -- this season has nothing for me anymore

Stop with the nonsensical, intentionally poorly written, off-topic posts.

Hmmm... I've now done extensive testing on this and haven't found any problems. The emails come from: "SiouxSports.com Forums" <ssadm06@siouxsports.com> It's possible that the emails are being kicked into your spam/bulk folder. I'll try sending you a PM and watch to make sure the email leaves the system on this end... update, the email definitely left siouxsports.com, destined for your inbox, and hasn't yet bounced.

Mr. McFeely -- haven't we had this conversation before? We have a name, we have a URL, is it so hard to attribute correctly?

20 years from now we're all going to be comparing it to the Trail Blazers taking Sam Bowie over Michael Jordan...

I couldn't decide whether to close this thread or post... but here it comes: .... .... .... wait for it .... .... .... Link

Arlington just has MS-13 -- Arlington criminals prefer machetes to guns

Check in My Controls > Email Settings (under options) to see if "send email on new PM" is checked. Second, make sure your email address is correct in the upper right of "My Controls". If both of those are right, let me know.

In D.C. you can't possess a handgun that wasn't registered before 1976 (i.e. no 30 year old could legally own a gun). Further, if you happen to be old enough to have had a gun before the retroactive ban, D.C. law prohibits storing a gun in an operable condition, even in your home (i.e. useless for self-defense). Examining D.C. crime/murders to determine the effect on such of getting guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens is left as an exercise for the reader. Update -- DaveK's post reminded me that I didn't answer the question. Don't own any guns, but have no particular moral opposition.

You can't be serious. While you no doubt did a fine job pointing one of the extremely rare instances of such a thing happening outside contemporary times, are you just trying to be a contrarian (good timing) or are you seriously trying to suggest that nothing has changed? Of the list you linked to, what proportion have been since 1970? What proportion since 1990?

As a Virginian I honestly don't understand what has changed in the world. This didn't used to happen.

If you think this is somehow Buning's fault, you weren't paying attention to the more than ample signs coming from the new REA, pretty much since its inception. That's not to blame anyone specifically at REA; rather, this is the reality of big-time college athletics, first ushered into North Dakota by the arrival of the new REA. However it was inevitable, regardless, as its happening everywhere in college athletics.

OK, this is a known problem with this forum software. It has to do with deleting an unread message (not sure if that's the same as getting a message from someone on your "blocked" list or not). It is fixed in the next release, so as soon as that's available, I'll install it.