Teeder11

No argument there from me. Although, Korrie Wenzel, the relatively new Herald publisher and the editorial writer in this case, represents new blood on the board compared to the old board that made those past decisions. Jacobs and Yellow Bird are gone from the Herald leadership now. Hopefully, this is a step in a different direction.

In the spirit of fairness, this line was in the same editorial but did not make your initial post. Emphasis mine. As for us, we (The Herald editorial board) feel the university was bullied by the NCAA to retire the nickname. We (The Herald editorial board) still proudly wear Sioux gear to games and probably will for a while. There is a difference between racial insensitivity and supporting the university’s proud past.

I love them all! Go UND!!!!!

That's not weird. ( I know you didn't say it was.)

Make that 8 easy points missed.

Bigs have to get more active and dare I say violent under the hoop

UND has left 6 easy points on the court in the first 10 minutes due to missed lay ups.

Fetchy, did you even read Jdub's post at 11:33 a.m., or did you just feel the need to re-post the exact same link for emphasis sake?

Folks say recruits embellish their attributes on their Hudl tapes, so it's probably more likely he only benches single plates and the bar! Ouch.

I don't know if he's any good or what kind of competition he plays against in JUCO, but a 40-time under 4.4 is pretty dang fast, even for a running back, right?

Is it or is it not the players' decision whether they red shirt or not, or is a combination of both coaches' decisions and players'? Thanks in advance if anyone has insight on this.

He fully understands it and appreciates it. I spent a good deal of time chatting with Dr. Kelley and Marcia at Saturday's women's basketball game against Montana , just as I've done at many other games before that. He gets it. But despite what I say here, we are all going to read something different into his actions and decisions as president based on our relative biases about the man -- good or bad. He will continue to make decisions about athetics based on its impact on the institution as a whole. That's his responsibility as president of the entire University .... Not just the athetics department. I am sure there are some in the arts and sciences and fine arts at UND that believe his administration is hostile to them, too, based on what they perceive as true or not. That doesn't make it so, though.

The first two sentences are patently false and do not need to be dignified with the myriad reasons why.

Anyone one can submit such a request, even you.

He's an aviation (air traffic control) major, so it might pay for a couple of training flights. ( : I think his dad is/was a NASA astronaut out of the Houston area, so the family might not be hurting financially.

It was a "bad win." LOL! Long road ahead of us, though, and lots of improvements needed offensively and defensively if we're going to stay in this.

I think we all just want UND to do as well as expected all the time. Nothing wrong with that.

Once again, we all want to debate on the extremes, because that's where it's more fun. But the truth is somewhere in the middle. We all know that the OOC schedule is NOT unimportant, but at the same time, no one believes the Big Sky slate is the end all be all, though winning it is the most logical path for any team to get good position for the conference tourney and a chance at getting into The Big Dance. But back to the extremes, 'cause it's more fun. What I think is not debatable is that any low to mid major that tears it up in the OOC portion of the schedule and completely falls on its face in the conference has somewhere close to zero chance of getting into the NCAA tourney. Whereas, an abysmal OOC showing, regardless if it's filled with Power 5 teams or D II cupcakes, followed by a winning conference effort, gets a team in position to make a run for The Dance. What OOC games are good for for most teams outside the P5 is tuning up, working out kinks, snatching an occasional upset if you can catch them napping, and finally, positioning the conference's collective ranking in such a way that it might get the eventual auto-bid conference winner as high a seed as possible in the NCAAs. But we all know, whether we admit it or not, that the realistic path to the NCAA tourney begins this afternoon in Bozeman. We are 0-0 in the conference, and our no-show against SU, collapse against SDSU in Brookings and our failure to adjust in second halves against P5 teams, mean very little for the next two months. What I think is completely debatable is the Xs and Os and coaching decisions that lead to these various outcomes. Carry on.

The poster wrote "good start" not "good win" -- big difference. Although I don't think there's such a thing as a bad win.

Too early to tell, he's only played 11 minutes of one game.

4-3... Chechs in OT

Doesn't matter now.

All tied up. Denmark goalie's game save % is north of 93 percent. The Czech's goalie is around 72 percent for the game on only 11 shots.

Oh, c'mon ... Jones can get him to turn. Shay has connections in Fla, not?

Gotta get on this guy! https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1551073235136386&fref=nf