At times it seems like they can't get out of their own way. We've seen glimpses of how good they can be and that's what frustrates me the most. Not the most talented team we've ever had, but you can win playing a solid 60 minutes of good sound team hockey.
I have this argument at work from time to time.
Is Eli Manning, Trent Dilfer, Joe Namath, and Joe Flacco > Dan Marino, Jim Kelly, Fran Tarkenton, and Warren Moon?
I'm no expert myself, it just seems like he sees the ice different then everyone else. As the years go by, given the right line mates, I think he can be an amazing playmaker. I could be wrong, but I hope I'm not.
I don't understand why you get so angry. You've had the best team in the FCS for half a decade. If UND was on that run I wouldn't care what anyone said. All I was getting at was that Stick isn't the best player on that team, Wentz was. I believe that a number of different QB's could win a title at NDSU. It's not a chink in the armor, he just isn't the most important player.
I'm not knocking the kid, a winner is a winner. I'm just wondering if you think he's the reason why they win, or he just plays his role on a very good team. Wentz isn't a fair comparison to anyone at the FCS level, but do you think NDSU could do what they do without Stick?