Cratter

I would happen to guess that the expansion and exposure of college hockey (AZ State/PAC 12 hockey) might just be what keeps tipping the scales toward USA college hockey over major juniors. Like many have said. Go to major juniors to pad your stats rather than playing against bigger more physically mature college players. But the problem is there are only so many scholarships currently available at the college level any given year.

Dave Hakstol is 1-5 in the semifinals.

My disappointment has been that Hakstol has only been to the title game once. It's not like he's constantly losing in the championship game. He's good at the regular season and getting to the frozen four. After that not so much.

At least it appears fans won't have to worry about not making the Fargo regional.

Great movie.

Your bit is getting old. That was your response to others too yesterday. People like myself that didn't support Mussman of all people.

Darrell is a fan of firing coaches.

gfhokey for persident

Darrell was just waiting for UND to lose to a "lesser team." Hakstol would/should have been fired long ago then. No coach has taken as long as UND has to win no championships than the current men's hockey coach. UND men's basketball "almost" has made it to the NCAA "dance." Which no UND men's basketball coach has ever been close to achieving before!

Memorial Stadium would hold all the people that would wanna go. And that's without the east bleachers.

Took SDSU three plays this time to score a TD.

Took SDSU two plays to score.

We should start a pool. When will Wisconsin win their first game.

I agree. But they should still use the Pairwise Rankings later in the year and not the poll numbers.

Omaha is 4th in the Pairwise. UND is 12th in the Pairwise. The Pairwise is actually used to select NCAA tournament teams. The polls are not. So doesn't that make the polls irrelevant? Why do we continue to put the polls ranking next to the teams on the tv? You'd think UND was the better team, but according to the thing that ACTUALLY selects NCAA teams they are actually reversed. Doesn't his create confusion?

We have a winner. Utah is a very good basketball team.

Cause I actually watch college hockey? Sometimes without green glasses. Did you see all the people that think UND is world beaters because they have a 2 by their name? And Omaha is a "crappy" team despite having less losses than UND does.

Everyone hates shootouts when you lose. Love em when you win. Its only for conference rankings. So whats it matter? You need to crown a conference champion somehow.

Isn't this site google? Don't know something just ask instead of looking it up?

Only cause UND has played more games. Its called Parity. Its what causes teams that have never sniffed a championship to get one. Yale, Union. UNO.

Nailed it.

They are ahead of UND in the conference.

Omaha basically wins the game. They get two points UND gets one.

Parity. Blais might win another championship before Hakstol.

Shootout has to go to advantage Omaha with their goalie having better numbers.