The Sicatoka

If anyone questions my statements about why the offensive line is the most important part of a team, well, just look at the Vikings yesterday. Three guys in the middle of the OL shuffled around and they are just not the same team.

There's a gif of Wentz's left knee moving laterally on Schefter's Twitter feed. (Not "Theisman bad" bad, but if you don't like knee injuries ... ) https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/940047659594739712

NDSU doesn’t do anything exceptional; but, what they do they do exceptionally well.

Someone needs to tell CHN their standings are incorrect. UND is 5-2-2-2 for 19 points, tied with SCSU at 6-2-1-0.

C'mon man. Read the column headings. Table 2 breaks down Table 1 into F/T and P/T School F/T P/T Total (from T1) NDSU 2497 257 2754 UND 1806 802 2608

The AD has to be foremost an administrator, then a people-schmoozer.

"I'm not an athlete. I'm a professional baseball player." -- John Kruk, former Phillies first baseman

Ginger Punter! C'mon, someone had to say it. Welcome aboard Cade Peterson, ... now just get the damn punt off!

Preach.

That's how all basketball looks to me. Signed, An admitted non-basketball guy

Kentucky: home arena -- check schedule poster theme -- check Sorry ... got distracted ... what comes after schedule poste...

Think about what you just said: review the offside. See: UND v. BU, Scheel's Arena circa April 2017. That's still disputed. If the play was close enough to be allowed to go on at zone entry this solution is simple: Roll backwards from the goal. If the defender had the puck and failed to clear it's on him. What this rule will probably cause is linesmen to fail more to the "offsides" whistle and less to the "good" on zone entries. Why? If they let it go and the possession changes and the goal happens (the UND scenario) they'll hear about it from the coach that was "wronged". Yes, imagine this rule in place in April 2017: From the Bowen goal, the tape rolls back to the BU defender having and losing the puck. End of review. Good goal. UND win. And BU coaches claiming "it was offside" to this day. <-- This scenario I believe will cause more "close" offsides plays to be whistled down than let go on.

Mafia did not know this but I kept a tracer on his iPod ... and this shows up. " ... giving the ol' how's she goin' ... "

From the goal you review backwards in time to either (A) possession change in zone, or (B) zone entry, not both. Under the current rule, from Bowen's goal you rewind until the BU defenseman takes a stride with the puck. <--- Possession change; good goal.

The only time it matters is if a goal is scored. Otherwise, the human error slides away unnoticed, unreviewed, as it is of nominal consequence.

Good grief people. Control what is yours to control. All the other stuff takes care of itself.

Your endowment number is low.

I have the video queued up to the point where this new rule, and its immediate implementation, is discussed.

Everyone's questions answered in one easy mouse click.

Some here get their wish?

Could Thome and Anderson have taken off "the big pads" before the salute?

Re: UCF/Memphis If you took the under at 116.5 points ... you lost.

But UCF played a heck of a MBB game against Memphis Saturday at 62-55. Huh? What's that? That was ... a football score?