Let's recap:
PCM brings up a series of articles written by an Illinois partisan, one of which borrows a quote from Tarkanian v. NCAA.
IowaBison notes Tarkanian was overturned.
I point out that this isn't a "state actor" case but a "contract law" case and that the NCAA Executive Committee may have overreached.
IowaBison asks how so I answer.
IowaBison points out NCAA constitution 4.1.2 and 2.6.
Minor squabbling over POVs ensues.
I point out 1.2 (a-h), all of 1.3, and 2.2.2, all of which show that ExecComm may have overreached.
IowaBison jumps on the "tribal support" question (and is shown again that Spirit Lake stands by their 2000 resolution).
IowaBison, why'd you leave the "contract law" question?
And as far as the "support" question, from Spirit Lake Tribe A05-01-041
" ... something positive ... ", though clearly a subjective measure, may be occurring right here, right now, on this board (how's that for suckin' up to the Administrator?):