nodakvindy Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 College Hockey News has posted its You Are The Committee. There are numerous scenarios where UND can still get a #1 seed, even up to #3 overall. But at the least, a high 2 is a certainty if they take care of business at the Final 5. http://www.collegehockeynews.com/ratings/yatc.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big A HG Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 My prediction put UND at a T5 with Michigan... I'll take a 2 seed...don't matter at this point in the year because the Nat'l Champion is always a team with momentum, and at some point you have to start playing good teams anyways. So either way, you might get one...maybe two...games that are marginally eaiser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farce poobah Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 College Hockey News has posted its You Are The Committee. There are numerous scenarios where UND can still get a #1 seed, even up to #3 overall. But at the least, a high 2 is a certainty is they take care of business at the Final 5. http://www.collegehockeynews.com/ratings/yatc.php Thanks for posting - after playing with the scenarios, it looks like we need our ECAC buddies Dartmouth to help if we want to get a #1. Wondering if you see any "must win" games elsewhere for a #1 to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 It appears that both CC and Denver have played their way out of the tourney. Wisco must win the final five to get in, and Mich Tech probably needs a couple wins, especially one against the top 3 final five teams, after beating Wisco, to have a shot at getting in. Otherwise, just 3 WCHA teams. With Denver out, I'd guess the Sioux could end up there as a 2 seed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickboy1956 Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 Thanks for posting - after playing with the scenarios, it looks like we need our ECAC buddies Dartmouth to help if we want to get a #1. Wondering if you see any "must win" games elsewhere for a #1 to work. One scenario on the USCHO that puts UND as a #1 seed would be for HE/ECHL/CCHA tournaments go to chalk and UND to win the f5 and SCS losing twice. That puts the #1 seeds as Nortre Dame, Minn, NH and UND, in that order, which would probably put us in Denver. Our bracket would have Clarkson and Maine/Mass and/or St. L. Not out of the question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodakvindy Posted March 12, 2007 Author Share Posted March 12, 2007 Thanks for posting - after playing with the scenarios, it looks like we need our ECAC buddies Dartmouth to help if we want to get a #1. Wondering if you see any "must win" games elsewhere for a #1 to work. It looks like a UMass win of Hockey East would be beneficial (since it would hurt BC, BU and UNH) and paired with St. Lawrence win of the ECACHL could get the Sioux up to #3 overall. Also, it appears losing the 3rd place game would hurt St. Cloud a ton, so that's something else to pull for. But first things first, and that's the Sioux winning Friday and Saturday night. If that doesn't happen, then the rest doesn't really matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickboy1956 Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 It looks like a UMass win of Hockey East would be beneficial (since it would hurt BC, BU and UNH) and paired with St. Lawrence win of the ECACHL could get the Sioux up to #3 overall. Also, it appears losing the 3rd place game would hurt St. Cloud a ton, so that's something else to pull for. But first things first, and that's the Sioux winning Friday and Saturday night. If that doesn't happen, then the rest doesn't really matter. Because of Denver/CC's demise, having NH and us as #1 seeds would be great. They would have to put NH at home, leaving us to be the #1 in Denver, with no local team to influence the crowd unfairly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxnami Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 Because of Denver/CC's demise, having NH and us as #1 seeds would be great. They would have to put NH at home, leaving us to be the #1 in Denver, with no local team to influence the crowd unfairly. I think it is really unfair that DU can be a top 10 KRACH Team and not make the tournament. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZSIOUX Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 I think it is really unfair that DU can be a top 10 KRACH Team and not make the tournament. that is crazy but they did suck the big one down the stretch so have fun at home clowns from du and punkabich... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodakvindy Posted March 12, 2007 Author Share Posted March 12, 2007 CC is definitely out, but Denver has a glimmer of hope. Here is a scenario where Denver is in, and UND is a #1 seed. It would likely have us in Rochester with Clarkson, Maine and Quinnipiac. This setup would be great as it would spread out all four WCHA teams, with three as #1 seeds (sound familiar). You have specified the following weight for the quality win bonus: .003 per quality road win User-Specified Results You have specified the following tournament results: Atlantic Hockey Semifinal #2: Connecticut defeats Army. Atlantic Hockey Semifinal #1: Air Force defeats Sacred Heart. Atlantic Hockey Championship game: Air Force defeats Connecticut. CCHA Semifinal #2: Michigan defeats Michigan State. CCHA Semifinal #1: Notre Dame defeats Lake Superior. CCHA Championship game: Notre Dame defeats Michigan. CCHA Consolation game: Lake Superior defeats Michigan State. ECAC Semifinal #2: Dartmouth defeats Clarkson. ECAC Semifinal #1: Quinnipiac defeats St. Lawrence. ECAC Championship game: Quinnipiac defeats Dartmouth. ECAC Consolation game: Clarkson defeats St. Lawrence. Hockey East Semifinal #2: Boston College defeats Boston University. Hockey East Semifinal #1: Massachusetts defeats New Hampshire. Hockey East Championship game: Massachusetts defeats Boston College. WCHA Play-in #1: Wisconsin defeats Michigan Tech. WCHA Semifinal #2: North Dakota defeats St. Cloud State. WCHA Semifinal #1: Minnesota defeats Wisconsin. WCHA Championship game: North Dakota defeats Minnesota. WCHA Consolation game: St. Cloud State defeats Wisconsin. Denver needs Sacred Heart to lose, Michigan State and St. Lawrence to lose twice. Air Force winning Atlantic Hockey would also be big help. There are some scenarios where Denver, St. Lawrence and Michigan State are separated by only .0001 in the RPI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodakvindy Posted March 17, 2007 Author Share Posted March 17, 2007 Heading into the league championship games, most of the results are now down to seeding, with Quinnipiac the only party crasher still alive. I am pulling for New Hampshire, Clarkson and Notre Dame along with the Sioux. If Dartmouth holds on in the ECAC Consolation game and those teams win, the tourney field would set up like this. I think a pretty favorable draw for UND. I think this would hold up for attendance purposes but ideally, I'd switch the Michigan/BU and St. Cloud/Maine games to avoid second round conference matchups. Grand Rapids 1 Notre Dame 4 Alabama Huntsville 2 Michigan 3 Boston University Manchester 1 New Hampshire 4 Dartmouth 2 North Dakota 3 Miami Rochester 1 Clarkson 4 UMass 2 Boston College 3 Michigan St. Denver 1 Minnesota 4 Army/Air Force 2 St. Cloud St. 3 Maine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeidiSioux62 Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 Just missed you and posted this in another thread, but I think that this is a more appropriate thread. Here is what I plugged into the "Pairwise Predictor" on USCHO that will give us the #4 seed overall Notre Dame beats Michigan Dartmouth beats St. Lawrence Quinnipiac beats Clarkson New Hampshire beats Boston College Army beats Air Force North Dakota beats Minnesota (of course) and there is a .003 bonus (which is what Jay Moy over at USCHO uses) 1 Notre Dame (Nt) 24 .5808* 2 Minnesota (Mn) 23 .5778 3 New Hampshire (NH) 22 .5690* 4 North Dakota (ND) 21 .5638 5t St. Cloud State (SC) 19 .5621 5t Clarkson (Ck) 19 .5581 5t Boston College (BC) 19 .5527* 8t Michigan (Mi) 16 .5489 8t Boston University (BU) 16 .5472 8t Michigan State (MS) 16 .5394 11t Maine (Me) 13 .5367 11t Miami (Mm) 13 .5343 11t Massachusetts (MA) 13 .5328 14t Dartmouth (Da) 9 .5363 14t Denver (DU) 9 .5326 14t Michigan Tech (MT) 9 .5220 17t St. Lawrence (SL) 8 .5324 17t Wisconsin (Wi) 8 .5286 19 Colorado College (CC) 7 .5233 20 Quinnipiac (Qn) 6 .5308 21 Vermont (Vt) 4 .5223 22 Cornell (Cr) 3 .5079 23 Lake Superior (LS) 2 .5119 24 RIT (RT) 1 .5054 25 Nebraska-Omaha (NO) 0 .5052 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southpaw Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 Just missed you and posted this in another thread, but I think that this is a more appropriate thread. Here is what I plugged into the "Pairwise Predictor" on USCHO that will give us the #4 seed overall Notre Dame beats Michigan Dartmouth beats St. Lawrence Quinnipiac beats Clarkson New Hampshire beats Boston College Army beats Air Force North Dakota beats Minnesota (of course) and there is a .003 bonus (which is what Jay Moy over at USCHO uses) actually this is what needs to happen (changes in bold): Notre Dame beats Michigan Dartmouth beats or ties St. Lawrence Quinnipiac beats Clarkson New Hampshire beats Boston College Army and Air Force doesn't matter North Dakota beats Minnesota Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxdonyms Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 actually this is what needs to happen (changes in bold): Notre Dame beats Michigan Dartmouth beats or ties St. Lawrence Quinnipiac beats Clarkson New Hampshire beats Boston College Army and Air Force doesn't matter North Dakota beats Minnesota Going to be tough for UNH to beat BC, with as well as BC played last night. After watching games last night, they're the only team that I would not feel comfortable meeting next weekend. Other than that, I think we can win if we play our game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejm Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 Thanks for all the work on the YATC stuff, but there are just too many upsets required for the Sioux to climb above a #2 seed. If the favorites win tonight, and the Sioux stub their toe against Minnesota, they could find themselves dropping a long ways in the Pairwise. If the favorites win, and that includes the Sioux, they'll end up with a solid #2 seed. Just win, baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southpaw Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 Thanks for all the work on the YATC stuff, but there are just too many upsets required for the Sioux to climb above a #2 seed. If the favorites win tonight, and the Sioux stub their toe against Minnesota, they could find themselves dropping a long ways in the Pairwise. If the favorites win, and that includes the Sioux, they'll end up with a solid #2 seed. Just win, baby. dartmouth just lost to st lawrence, meaning the sioux can at best be a #2 seed. hopefully they can win tonight and avoid being placed in the grand rapids regional with michigan and minnesota. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejm Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 It'll be interesting to see where the Committee sends everyone. The Sioux fall to 10, a #3 seed. Wisconsin almost claws back in (unless the bonus is something other than .003). And Denver is right there at the doorstep looking in. At Christmas time, how many of us would've truly thought the Sioux would find themselves here? Skate to #8 young men. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7>4 Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 It'll be interesting to see where the Committee sends everyone. The Sioux fall to 10, a #3 seed. Wisconsin almost claws back in (unless the bonus is something other than .003). And Denver is right there at the doorstep looking in. At Christmas time, how many of us would've truly thought the Sioux would find themselves here? Skate to #8 young men. If the seed based on current pairwise and .003 bonus, Sioux as a 10 would be placed in Clarkston region would they not since they would be considered the second highest three seed thereby being placed in the third highest one seed? Or do they just seed 1-4 and then base decisions on location and attendance? The good thing is we are playing next weekend. GO SIOUX. Only two losses in 07 were in OT. I like the way we are playing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND83 Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 If the seed based on current pairwise and .003 bonus, Sioux as a 10 would be placed in Clarkston region would they not since they would be considered the second highest three seed thereby being placed in the third highest one seed? Or do they just seed 1-4 and then base decisions on location and attendance? The good thing is we are playing next weekend. GO SIOUX. Only two losses in 07 were in OT. I like the way we are playing. I think they try to seed: Region 1: 1v16, 8v9 Region 2: 2v15, 7v10 Region 3: 3v14, 6v11 Region 4: 4v13, 5v12 If that is the case, we (at number 10 with .003 bonus) would be in Notre Dame's (#2) bracket. We would get BU in game 1. We wouldn't get Minn. until the national championship game since region 2v3 and region 1v4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fargosioux Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 I think we're going to have a near replay of last year's West Regional, with Minnesota, Michigan, and North Dakota all getting placed in Denver. I did have Alabama-Huntsville in this region, until I read Moy's Bracketology on USCHO. He thinks Air Force will get place in Denver for attendance purposes. He's probably right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sagard Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 They have a BC/UNH rematch set and a Gophers/UND rematch set. Stupid. PWR is not accurate enough to warrant strict adherence when seeding the teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mezzy05 Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 They have a BC/UNH rematch set and a Gophers/UND rematch set. Stupid. PWR is not accurate enough to warrant strict adherence when seeding the teams. Relax, Moy drank too much tonight, his explanation is full of poor logic...he must be a closet Gopher fan... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sagard Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 Relax, Moy drank too much tonight, his explanation is full of poor logic...he must be a closet Gopher fan... I hope your right but the NCAA paints themselves into a corner with their needless seeding rules. I support PWR picking the teams for the tourney, but in the national tourney they should avoid having any top two seeds in a given region from the same conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodakvindy Posted March 18, 2007 Author Share Posted March 18, 2007 I commented on USCHO that this proposed bracket is the best I've seen. It adheres to a perfect bracket for the high seed (1-8) and only requires two switches among the lower seeds. It spreads out all four CCHA teams and all three WCHA teams, while putting at least one Hockey East team in each bracket as well. It also should fare well attendance wise. Grand Rapids 1 Minnesota (WC) 8 Michigan (CC) 11 Mass-Amherst (HE) 16 Alabama-Huntsville (CH) Denver 2 Notre Dame (CC) 7 Boston Univ (HE) 10 North Dakota (WC) 15 Air Force (AH) Rochester 3 Clarkson (EC) 6 St Cloud (WC) 9 Mich State (CC) 13 Maine (HE) Manchester 4 New Hampshire (HE) 5 Boston Coll (HE) 12 St Lawrence (EC) 14 Miami (CC) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farce poobah Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 I commented on USCHO that this proposed bracket is the best I've seen. It adheres to a perfect bracket for the high seed (1-8) and only requires two switches among the lower seeds. It spreads out all four CCHA teams and all three WCHA teams, while putting at least one Hockey East team in each bracket as well. It also should fare well attendance wise. Grand Rapids 1 Minnesota (WC) 8 Michigan (CC) 11 Mass-Amherst (HE) 16 Alabama-Huntsville (CH) Denver 2 Notre Dame (CC) 7 Boston Univ (HE) 10 North Dakota (WC) 15 Air Force (AH) Rochester 3 Clarkson (EC) 6 St Cloud (WC) 9 Mich State (CC) 13 Maine (HE) Manchester 4 New Hampshire (HE) 5 Boston Coll (HE) 12 St Lawrence (EC) 14 Miami (CC) Given that there's so little difference between the 3 seeds and the 2 seeds, I agree. Set up more interesting regionals with matchups that you don't already see every weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.