star2city Posted April 24, 2007 Author Share Posted April 24, 2007 All news services are dependent on money from advertisers/donors. If a money source doesn't like the way the news is presented or doesn't like the news, should the news service change the facts even though it's the wrong thing to do? If they don't, they don't get money and then they can't present the news anyway. You're saying that we are subject to the money sources views on what is 'good news' and what is 'unacceptable news. The NC$$ is telling some institutions of higher learning what is 'hostile or abusive' in names. logos, mascots. If we don't agree with them, we don't get to play in their post season games unless we change. We don't change, we can't play. We change, we are agreeing with their opinion on what is 'hostile or abusive'. I see Imus as an entertainment source, much as Fighting Sioux athletics are. My point was that advertisers for NCAA events are not clamoring to quit advertising during NCAA championships because they are offended by Indian images. I see your point, but a better analogy to the NCAA / Indian nickname issue would have been if Imus was fired by CBS and the advertisers were clamoring to keep him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxSioux Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 Quiet leaders who are willing to make difficult decisions Kudos first to novelist Louise Erdrich, who quietly turned down an honorary degree from the University of North Dakota because she objects to the nickname "Fighting Sioux." Erdrich is one of North Dakota's greatest artists. At some point the leadership at UND will realize that the prize for poor sportsmanship and illiberal stubbornness is simply too high. It's amazing how she is lauded for standing by her principles, yet she chastises UND for standing up against the NCAA for being "labeled" "hostile and abusive". BTW, the definition of illiberal is "Narrow-minded; bigoted." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 It is quite possible that eminent scholars will refuse to be recruited by UND until the name is changed to something more benign, that celebrated writers, both Indian and non-Indian, will refuse to attend the annual UND writers' conference, and that some foundations will refuse to make grants to UND given its intransigence on an issue so peripheral to the outstanding intellectual work that occurs there. Something "more benign"? You mean something everyone can agree on? Heck, SDSU can't agree on a picture of a bunny-wabbit for a new logo! Can it get more benign (or inane)? As a wise man once said, "I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody." -- William Henry "Bill" Cosby, Jr., Ph.D. And if this is so much the possibility, why hasn't this been happening since the 1970s (or before)? And finally, "on an issue so peripheral" ... indeed. If this is so peripheral why is it an issue at all. The noted scholar may have just put one through the hull of his own intellectual battleship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 I thought Erdrich has been trolling around Minneapolis for the past 10-15 years or so. So, I doubt she has any real connection to NoDak or UND. Moreover, her divorce proceedings from Michael Dorris, and some of the accusations against her by her kid, make me wonder why UND would even bother giving her the honor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Illiniwek Supporter Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 It is quite possible that eminent scholars will refuse to be recruited by UND until the name is changed to something more benign... And of course, the judges of exactly what is and is not "benign" will be.... who? and that some foundations will refuse to make grants Others may choose to give grants because you refuse to kotow to the PC patrol. And others may drop their grants if you do change nicknames. Any real numbers here? to UND given its intransigence on an issue so peripheral to the outstanding intellectual work that occurs there. Why is it that the issue should be peripheral to those who support the nickname: but its a given that the nickname is somehow a lifelong cause to those who don't like it? Where's the logic there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewey Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 It looks like the rubes are at it again. Of the 20 schools or so on the NC00 hit list, UND is the only one who is remaining non-compliant and it stands alone in that non-compliance. UND has the backbone to fight an inequitable and nonsensical "policy" and the GF Fishwrap reporters try to convey that it is the outcast? I'm sure that the vast majority of the GF residents don't buy this sewage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 It looks like the rubes are at it again. Of the 20 schools or so on the NC00 hit list, UND is the only one who is remaining non-compliant and it stands alone in that non-compliance. UND has the backbone to fight an inequitable and nonsensical "policy" and the GF Fishwrap reporters try to convey that it is the outcast? I'm sure that the vast majority of the GF residents don't buy this sewage. They will never go away, they have an agenda and until UND surrenders to the PC Zealots they will continue to put up with this crap... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 This guy's obviously attended Doreen Yellowbird's course on "Logic and Writing". Educational institutions are supposed be places where students come to unlearn the racial stereotyping that such logos represent. As such, consider the $430,000 that UND already has spent on its lawsuit against the NCAA. The Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 This guy's obviously attended Doreen Yellowbird's course on "Logic and Writing". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 In reference to the money, Leigh Jeanotte, director of American Indian Student Services at UND said, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewey Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux-cia Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 Linky The people who are best qualified to answer how something affects them are the ones who are suffering from it the most. I asked SS.com members who are Sioux Name Change supporters, more than once, "How is the name and logo hurting Sioux Indians? How is the name and logo contributing to their suffering?" They offered no response. Having lived on a Navajo reservation for the past seven and a half months, I can list many reasons that Native Americans are suffering, hurting, etc. A sport team's Native American Indian name and logo is not one of them. I have seen many Navajos displaying 'Red Skins' football clothing, hats, and bumper stickers. It's so easy to throw out, 'we (they) are suffering because of Native American sports names and logos', 'Native American names and logos for sports teams are hostile and abusive', 'Native American sports names and logos result in prejudicial treatment', etc. Where is the proof? Because of attempts to change the mascot and logo many American Indian students, the resolution claims, were harassed, threatened and received death threats. Indian Country Today could not verify the nature of the alleged threats. http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096411618 One would think if there was proof a Native American publication such as Indian Country Today would be able to verify those 'claims'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux-cia Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 How much money has the NCAA wasted on this lawsuit and how come no one's complaining about that money and how it could be better spent? The NCAA started this. What he fails to say is that UND already has as many or more Native American programs than most institutions of higher education in the country, let alone the State of North Dakota and it's bordering states. How many more does he want!?! AND the money used for the lawsuit is not being deducted from any personal (in my case anyway), educational, state, federal funding originally earmarked for Native American programs. Geeze Louise, when are they going to get it!!!!!!!!! *edited after error pointed out by HockeyMom! Thanks!* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Somehow, when I saw Nick Coleman had written a column on Roy Saigo, I just knew this would come up: One aspect of Saigo's work has not made him popular in North Dakota but has raised sensitivity to racial issues across the country. Appalled by the ruckus that attended each visit of the North Dakota Fighting Sioux hockey team to St. Cloud State, Saigo appealed to the conscience of the NCAA. If universities are to be educators, Saigo argued, the NCAA had to respond to the nickname issue. His prodding ultimately led the NCAA to ban Indian nicknames, although the University of North Dakota is still fighting the effort in court (the legal costs are approaching half a million). "I feel very personal about issues of equality and respect," says Saigo, who is often mistaken for an American Indian. "If we're educational institutions, we need to do a better job educating people." Wha? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Wha? Well, the Sioux are 5-2-3 at St. Cloud over the past five seasons. So maybe that's the "ruckus" that concerned Saigo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewey Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Somehow, when I saw Nick Coleman had written a column on Roy Saigo, I just knew this would come up: Wha? I wonder if he was/is appalled at the skin heads on campus and about the nightly ruckus on campus regarding the alcohol consumption, arrests, etc. Curiously, Nick Colman does not bring those up. Yep, Saigo sure is a leader. He concocts racism over a nickname where no racism exists and then can't or won't do anything to confront the problems at that school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 I wonder if he was/is appalled at the skin heads on campus and about the nightly ruckus on campus regarding the alcohol consumption, arrests, etc. Curiously, Nick Colman does not bring those up. Yep, Saigo sure is a leader. He concocts racism over a nickname where no racism exists and then can't or won't do anything to confront the problems at that school. Not to mention the litany of investigations and litigation regarding SCCC's systemic racism and anti-Semitism during Saigo's tenure, and the tax dollars that were doled out in the process. Nikki and Saigo deserve each other. F*** Saigo. Linky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Well, the Sioux are 5-2-3 at St. Cloud over the past five seasons. So maybe that's the "ruckus" that concerned Saigo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 I feel very personal about issues of equality and respect," says Saigo, who is often mistaken for an American Indian. "If we're educational institutions, we need to do a better job educating people." What is that, the guy is Asian. Nick Coleman is a Boob, I have other things I colud call him but this is a family show. Seriously, its laughable that Nick even writes this crap. Saigo is a disgrace and his campus has way more racial issues than UND, If you think I am joking talk to anyone that attended this school. To laud this guy as a champion of Racial right is a bigger joke than giving someone like Hugo Cavez or Saddam Hussein a Nobel Peace Prize. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND85 Posted June 23, 2007 Share Posted June 23, 2007 "Appalled by the ruckus that attended each visit of the North Dakota Fighting Sioux hockey team to St. Cloud State, Saigo appealed to the conscience of the NCAA." WHAT IS THAT? I have lived in St.Cloud since 1994, graduated from UND and have attended EVERY Sioux-SCSU hockey, football, basketball, soccer, and softball games during that time in St.Cloud. The only ruckus I can think of is about 10-15 students, most of which 2 years ago were foreign exchange students holding signs outside of the hockey arena. I asked one foreign exchange student why they were protesting. He said in broken English, "someone in the student union asked me to come and hold this sign for 30 minutes outside the hockey arena." This year there was a lot of snow that day so no protesters showed up. During the football games in the past years several walked around the stadium during the game holding signs that were to small to read. They were about 500 yards away and nobody in the crowd could even read them unless you had a telescope. By the way, the Sioux fans outnumbered the Huskies 10-1 in fans and we had our own band make the trip. I have two friends that teach at SCSU and they said Saigo has done nothing for the school in his tenure. I believe he has turned the attention away from his own issues at SCSU towards the ban the Sioux campaign in order for others not to see the many issues that are on his own campus. At the press conference for the new President this past spring , someone in the crowd asked if the new president would continue the fight against UND and the name change. He looked confused and really didn't answer the question. The look on his face almost seemed to say, "What kind of stupid question was that?" GO SIOUX! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted June 23, 2007 Share Posted June 23, 2007 "Appalled by the ruckus that attended each visit of the North Dakota Fighting Sioux hockey team to St. Cloud State, Saigo appealed to the conscience of the NCAA." WHAT IS THAT? I have lived in St.Cloud since 1994, graduated from UND and have attended EVERY Sioux-SCSU hockey, football, basketball, soccer, and softball games during that time in St.Cloud. The only ruckus I can think of is about 10-15 students, most of which 2 years ago were foreign exchange students holding signs outside of the hockey arena. I asked one foreign exchange student why they were protesting. He said in broken English, "someone in the student union asked me to come and hold this sign for 30 minutes outside the hockey arena." This year there was a lot of snow that day so no protesters showed up. During the football games in the past years several walked around the stadium during the game holding signs that were to small to read. They were about 500 yards away and nobody in the crowd could even read them unless you had a telescope. By the way, the Sioux fans outnumbered the Huskies 10-1 in fans and we had our own band make the trip. I have two friends that teach at SCSU and they said Saigo has done nothing for the school in his tenure. I believe he has turned the attention away from his own issues at SCSU towards the ban the Sioux campaign in order for others not to see the many issues that are on his own campus. At the press conference for the new President this past spring , someone in the crowd asked if the new president would continue the fight against UND and the name change. He looked confused and really didn't answer the question. The look on his face almost seemed to say, "What kind of stupid question was that?" GO SIOUX! I guess that is their definition of a ruckus... Yikes... That is a really nice post. It seems that the Anti-Sioux crowd are basically basing their whole legacy on a singel issue. What happens when UND wins in court? I suppose they keep pounding away at the issue... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted June 24, 2007 Share Posted June 24, 2007 The only "ruckus" on SCCC's campus usually came from the frat houses and other places students partied and got busted. All's well in White Cloud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux-cia Posted June 24, 2007 Share Posted June 24, 2007 So SCCC students created a ruckus because of the Sioux name!?! Then that means anti-semitic activities on the SCCC campus are the Jewish communities fault?! OK, I get it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Illiniwek Supporter Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Here's a nice letter to the editor from the hometown newspaper of the University of Illinois. http://www.news-gazette.com/news/opinions/...e_as_a_surprise Wear a hat someone disagrees with? You're a racist. Love to see that guy come up to Chicago during hockey season. (Personally, I would have loved to see him try to "talk some sense" into the balcony dwellers at the old Stadium. It was a long walk up there, and people were in no mood for nonsense by the time they got to their seats.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Here's a nice letter to the editor from the hometown newspaper of the University of Illinois. http://www.news-gazette.com/news/opinions/...e_as_a_surprise Wear a hat someone disagrees with? You're a racist. Love to see that guy come up to Chicago during hockey season. (Personally, I would have loved to see him try to "talk some sense" into the balcony dwellers at the old Stadium. It was a long walk up there, and people were in no mood for nonsense by the time they got to their seats.) You're a racist if one of your employees wears the hat in this case. Wow. I just drove through Boonsboro, Maryland. I didn't know how backward those people are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.