Pudd Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 good article http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/157114 Quote
SIOUXPR Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 Good Article? Jody Hodgson is a tool. Apparently lost in his tears is any attempt to actually be a professional and not let his childish emotions get in the way. Quote
NorthDakotaHockey Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 Good Article? Jody Hodgson is a tool. Apparently lost in his tears is any attempt to actually be a professional and not let his childish emotions get in the way. I guess it must take a tool to recognize a tool, eh Tool? Your post is ridiculous. And, or course, childish. Quote
Matt Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 Takes one to know one? Is that where we are now guys? Quote
Let'sGoHawks! Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 Good Article? Jody Hodgson is a tool. Apparently lost in his tears is any attempt to actually be a professional and not let his childish emotions get in the way. How is he a tool? Everything he said is true. Please tell us what points are not true? It is refreshing that somebody actually is telling it like it is! Quote
Blackheart Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 How is he a tool? Everything he said is true. Please tell us what points are not true? It is refreshing that somebody actually is telling it like it is! No worries... SiouxPR is the tool... Quote
Oxbow6 Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 No worries... SiouxPR is the tool... Looks like SIOUXPR is building quite the fan club!? Quote
Goon Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 Good Article? Jody Hodgson is a tool. Apparently lost in his tears is any attempt to actually be a professional and not let his childish emotions get in the way. Well, you might be in the minority because there are a lot of people that have applauded what Jody said. Quote
rochsioux Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 good article http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/157114 I agree with everything he says, especially this: "The only urgency in the matter is that those that wanted to see the nickname and logo change were beginning to think that it might be approved," Hodgson said. "They thought, 'We better get these things changed because we might have both tribes approving this thing.' That's the only conclusion I can come to." If were up to me I wouldn't change one thing in REA. In fact, I would work with SL and SR to expand the use of Native American imagery. Quote
airmail Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 Somebody having the stones to be honest and state publically what they really think.... too few and far between these days, I'm afraid. Quote
Blackheart Posted April 14, 2010 Posted April 14, 2010 Somebody having the stones to be honest and state publically what they really think.... too few and far between these days, I'm afraid. Just think what might have happened had ANYONE in the UND leadership taken this stance. I applaud Hakstol and Roebuck for having the cajones to say what they felt. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.