brianvf Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 You mean kind of like how Prpich would rather spear Paukovich in the groin rather than stand up to him face to face? Technically, they were face-to-face at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sioux7 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 You mean kind of like how Prpich would rather spear Paukovich in the groin rather than stand up to him face to face? Prpich would take punko Paukovich out behind the woodshed and whip him like a rented mule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZSIOUX Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 You mean kind of like how Prpich would rather spear Paukovich in the groin rather than stand up to him face to face? sure was a cheap shot by prp, i will admit that and also admit the sioux tried 10 times to fight that sack of crap face to face and he hid everytime after he darn near ended binas career. a little cup check was all it was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 sure was a cheap shot by prp, i will admit that and also admit the sioux tried 10 times to fight that sack of crap face to face and he hid everytime after he darn near ended binas career. a little cup check was all it was And yet he Punkobitch is still up to his old tricks in the Pros as well. Geoff Paukovich vowed he was doing nothing more than his job. Trouble was, it was just three years ago that the Edmonton Oilers winger had been on the delivering end of another hit that sent another player off on a stretcher. On Sunday, four minutes into the third period of a rookie tournament tilt between the Oilers and Calgary Flames, Paukovich, reacting to a hit, drilled Kyle Greentree. He drove the Flames winger into the end boards with enough force to drop Greentree to the ice. He remained there for the longest time, then eventually left on a stretcher. Paukovich was sent to the locker-room. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 You mean kind of like how Prpich would rather spear Paukovich in the groin rather than stand up to him face to face? Apparently you don't know what a spear is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnt Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 You mean kind of like how Prpich would rather spear Paukovich in the groin rather than stand up to him face to face? I am not saying that Sioux players are all angels, and what he did was the wrong way to go about things. My problem is with people with maroon-colored glasses that can't see that to every action there is a reaction, and that the gophers were just as culpable, if not more, in the series they played a few weeks ago. To see the Sioux as dirty, and dismiss what Lucia and Stoa did seems to be the norm at gopher nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Apparently you don't know what a spear is. I thought that was a classic cup check? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopherz Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Congrats on the press Goon, good stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Congrats on the press Goon, good stuff. My wife laughed as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I thought that was a classic cup check? SECTION 49. A player shall not spear an opponent. Spearing shall mean stabbing an opponent with the point of the stick blade while the stick is being carried with one or both hands. Spearing includes all cases where a spearing gesture is made regardless of whether contact occurs. PENALTY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 The rules don't specify that this can only be called in a jabbing motion meaning that it could be interpreted from swinging the stick. I guess I've never seen that called that way but I could be wrong. However: In this case contact with the cup came from the shaft of the stick in a swinging motion. The blade of the stick was clearly visible behind Pauk's derriere. In no way would that be ruled as a spear. Not a high sticking either. I would call it a slashing maybe of the 4 minute or 5 minute variety. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big A HG Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Not a high sticking either. I would call it a slashing maybe of the 4 minute or 5 minute variety. I'd give Prpich the classic 2 minute Old Time Fighting Sioux Hockey penalty....we get lots of those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Not a high sticking either. I would call it a slashing maybe of the 4 minute or 5 minute variety. Oh yeah, if they called it a major slash at the time you couldn't argue with it at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZSIOUX Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 i would given prp 2 MINUTES for NUTZSLAPPING with a stick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big A HG Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 i would given prp 2 MINUTES for NUTZSLAPPING with a stick Could you have called it something else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t_speaker31 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 2 and 10 for intent to stop pauk from ever reproducing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 2 and 10 for intent to stop pauk from ever reproducing Just trying to deuglify the world. Should be 2 for slashing and 10 minutes suspended for improving the breed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 I am not saying that Sioux players are all angels, and what he did was the wrong way to go about things. My problem is with people with maroon-colored glasses that can't see that to every action there is a reaction, and that the gophers were just as culpable, if not more, in the series they played a few weeks ago. To see the Sioux as dirty, and dismiss what Lucia and Stoa did seems to be the norm at gopher nation. Not to mention that they certainly lost the moral high ground last night. The gophers don't need Conboy, they have Schack. Conboy was suspended for the season. I wonder what Schack will get? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 Not to mention that they certainly lost the moral high ground last night. The gophers don't need Conboy, they have Schack. Conboy was suspended for the season. I wonder what Schack will get? I am beginning to think that he will not get any additional penalties. The fact that it's a non story is troubling. If this had been UND player God Forbid. Since it is one of Lucia's golden boys it's ok I guess? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 Conboy would fight right in with Gophers. Losing in a game, go out to injure someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.