Dustin

Didn’t realize the sac st game was last night. Well, sh*t. Gotta root for sdsu now, right? Only team that can stop them, right?

BC scores a PP goal with 5.5 sec left in 2nd. 7-5 BC.

Wild one. I was just about to chime in, actually. 6-5 BC with 1:18 left in 2nd. BC to the PP.

Decided to watch BU-BC on ESPNews.

So not worth it?

Any linkage tonight?

I honestly couldn't even tell you another by name. Just that when recruiting Wisconsin, I am sure it helps to have the OC from there.

I don't really pay attention to that stuff, so I have no idea.

I've thought about that before, and not just with this kid. But especially with this kid, both being QBs.

Not a matter of playing time for these two. Something mutually agreed upon by coaches and players??

Better not

Totally agree. I mentioned somewhere else that there's no way anybody else on the committee should have gone along with putting NDSU and SDSU on the opposite side of the bracket.

So UND did indeed outbid Montana. My proposed situation from earlier is actually rendered moot. For shame...

Yes

So, two D-II schools and UND?

I am also not happy (and a little surprised) that NDSU got #3. No one from any other conference should have allowed this to happen. Rooting hard for Sac. State this weekend.

I believe someone said both UND and Montana were the last 2 at-large selections. If true, here's how this could have played out: Both UND and Montana (presumably, anyway) had larger bids than their opponents, but both also had inferior records. What would it look like if the committee gave both UND AND Montana home games against teams that had better records? There could have been an uproar with some schools saying, "Big schools can just buy a home game, so long as they are selected for the tournament, even if their opponent has a better resume." Then look at it the other way - both UND AND Montana go on the road. That scenario has a lot of missed revenue, since UND and Montana are both big bidders, so they probably don't want to go that route either. I suspect that the UND and Montana bids were pitted against EACH OTHER, and not their opponents. They gave Montana the home game because they (presumably) bid higher than UND (If this isn't the case, I would be even more upset, because then it was just a screwjob). If UND had outbid Montana (and I'm not saying that's what the goal should have been), UND probably would have been at home and Montana would have gone on the road. I know there's precedent that big schools can and have bought home games, and I know that UND was trying to do that. I'm guessing Montana was also. Did either team deserve one? In my opinion, no. That's why seeding more teams is important for the integrity of the bracket.

Mitchell or Skokna? I think I saw Skokna fair catch a couple of either kick-offs or punts, too.

Did Mitchell ever end up playing this season? I know Skokna was out there a few times, but not I don't remember him touching the ball much. Would be awesome to have these guys at full health for next year.

8 wins next year is necessary (even if the 8th win doesn't come in the regular season) to show growth.

How realistic is it to have a revamped FCS selection format by 2023? Is there enough of a stink being made about '22 that off-season coaches meetings, etc. will spur change? Seeding 16 teams seems like the obvious solution. Talking expectations for UND in '23: Offense - find a suitable replacement for Hoosman (maybe that's Smith, maybe not), continue to gel as O line, Tommy takes off a couple more times per game when that's what defense gives you, continue to score 30+ Defense - make the first tackle, bolster up the roster with some transfers, implement some sort of new wrinkle in the 3-4 to better fit the scheme to actual players, reduced points allowed (preferably under 20, but that might be such a big step in one year), force more turnovers Special Teams - improved kick coverage, improved place kicking, continue blocking punts Season goals - beat NDSU at home, no bad losses (for the record, I don't believe we had any in '22, but I know that could be debated), quarterfinal appearance at the very least (quarterfinal win preferred, that would put us past anywhere we've previously been)

Was there a reported bid that was higher from anyone else? Montana?

How much of our defensive problems can be attributed to missing the first tackle?

Me either. That’s why I was surprised someone even mentioned him.

If he’s interested, count me interested.