geaux_sioux

That seems consistent with what I've seen. Things seemed more 'open' on offense before Hakstol and maybe that's why sometimes UND looks less creative and skilled than their opponents. Miami and BC are two teams that usually expose that from what I've seen.

I'm a hockey fan but couldn't break down strategies or systems to save my life, is what Hak is running now very different to what Blais did when he was winning all the time?

None here.

If they lose to UNC that will say more than any game of the year. They have all the motivation in the world after how the game ended last year and it's the seniors last game at home. A loss there and it's basically curtains, as if it already isn't.

As his mistress I think it may be conflicting interests that I think UND needs to find a new coach.

Anyone watching 60min piece on Nick Saban? That is one impressive guy.

Regardless the team needs to be competitive.

It's not an attack. Its a joke. Eades or Blaise?

Give that man a contract extension

WWgfhockeyD?

Yes because he's on the d line and looks like he'll be a monster the next few years eating up double teams.

Pretty tight spiral though.....

I remember someone saying they saw a lot of the coaches at a bar after the Montana game. Not sure who it was. I also don't remember the bar.

They should wait for Winston.

Do they want Clowney or not?

I don't think anything would change for me. Id probably buy him a beer if I saw him at a bar or something.

That's it? I was thinking maybe something a little more celebratory.

The return of the stache

Honestly what would you do if they hire him?

Bingo. We need someone who is proven, they don't need to be 65 years old but they do need to be a proven winner and motivator.

None of the above.

I prefer to predict on what could happen based on potential. I'm optimistic on most things in life. I never claim that my predictions aren't homer pics. I'm not sure what my record is on predictions but I'm pretty sure I almost always predict a win. I'm sure my record sucks. Do I care? No, I don't take those very seriously. I've been on the record that I think UND needs to change things up so it's not like I'm trying to go down with the ship. If I suggest something is a fact it's because I know something that would lead to that. Go back and check my track record on those things. As far as siouxnation goes I don't care if a post is 99% dead on, if that 1% is some serious accusation with no proof that is not held up by anyone then it's a problem. Why is my credibility in question for wanting a level playing field in these arguments?

An apology? When did I mention an apology?

That's right. That was one hell of a documentary.

They did so 2 years ago? Something would have surfaced from somewhere.