Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Frozen4sioux

Members
  • Posts

    4,946
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by Frozen4sioux

  1. I wonder if there's any other ventures this or similar corporate entities have undertaken?
  2. I'll let you stew on these little tidbits... I Where was the company UND pays (paid) to mange all this? and.... All this stuff sounds complicated, seems like a lot of legaleeze is neede to navigate these waters. I wonder if they had guidance that made sure it was done proper at the time? B. I. N. G. O. what does he win Bob?... a coupon for a free Nothingburger
  3. Very much so... They've taken actions. You just don't see it as someone else pops up just as quick. Key is action is being taken to protect.
  4. Those guys can't hold Port's sleezekini... And non of them are out to get college athletics to any degree that port is
  5. I know... But you're not going to like the answer... and the Univ. does not want to talk about it.
  6. If anything.... all this is just another huge black eye for the University of North Dakota's horrendous licensing and marketing dept. How was Or..... or...... there's not the story here the highspeed Hawkzi kabal wants there to be and they had to farm it out to the sleeziest masterclickbaiter in the state.... What's more likely.. consider the others that also passed on it.
  7. Christ alive this isn't difficult there is no sinister evil plan... here or anywhere else Adidas isn't interested in the hockey apparel market at this time, they will continue to hold an asset.... to be continued. Hense as it relates to this thread and information.. whennit comes to hockey jerseys... CCM is Adidas Adidas is CCM
  8. Uffda.... Since the sale... Adidas HAS BEEN the branding on Athletic appeal in the hockey sector. Why... because... Despite a potential sale, Adidas will be "keeping the CCM apparel license not, transferring it to the new CCM owner." As "speculated"... man this is tough to comprehend why this is difficult for you..... Adidas removed the CCM labeling from the hockey apparel and applied the Adidas wordmark.... they however still holf and maintain the particular licence I mean I'd doubt crayons would help at this point... If only there was some way to have a visual proof of this.... maybe on EVERY NHL sweater currently used. Maybe even something closer to home... more sinister in your eyes? Now... moving forward... Adidas is exiting the hockey apperal sector... NO indication they are selling the "CCM apparel license" just no longer using it... Hence... . UND will be contracting with a new provider for future jerseys. Your lack of understand is key to sooooooo much else right now.
  9. This. This is a huge part in understanding who they had to drop down to in order to get someone to write story. Yes.
  10. My gawd read for understanding... It seems this is a difficult concept for you. "Despite a potential sale, Adidas will be "keeping the CCM apparel license, not transferring it to the new CCM owner."
  11. yes those details... they do matter. according to Josh Kosman of the N.Y. POST. Despite a potential sale, Adidas will be "keeping the CCM apparel license, not transferring it to the new CCM owner." A source said that starting with the '17-18 season, Adidas will "get rid of the CCM name on NHL apparel, replacing it with Adidas." However, the source added that CCM will "still be seen on NHL helmets and sticks." Kosman notes presently, CCM is the "official licensee for the NHL throwback jerseys, and many team sweatshirts and T-shirts" (N.Y. POST, 3/16).
  12. Port.... not exactly the 1st or 2nd string of reporters who've passed on this story already.
  13. who said anything about "buy"? Kinda key here
  14. This is where the ignorance just ooozes out of you Who didn't know?...
  15. CCM is Adidas Adidas is CCM Not sure who the new supplier for NHL will be but look to Underarmour as well as a possibility
  16. Dude you where months behind on your "subliminal" thinking you knew something. $0.00 thats how much. Massive nothingburger, no matter how much the Hawkzi's are trying to make of it.
  17. That's actually a very good question... I'd bet any contractual tie to addias would remain for the dept.... itbwould be interesting to find those details on contract... Im sure a FOIR could obtain it.
  18. Ok ill turn it back to the real thread here. Jersey Auction going on now. One holdover Reebok from the Brien days... wonder how many they have left squirreled away to spice up the auctions. Those things used to bring in a ton of money. Really tailed off for revenues and sale prices.... There should be a lot more to hit the auctions as now that Adidas has ceased making hockey sweaters... id imagine a slight redesign will be due for next season. I wonder what company won the contract for UND?
  19. Well it's usually just them screaming at each other in the football fourm "Reasons why it's hockey's fault football sucks" thread but... usually they migrate over here and old man yell at the clouds, or the Engelstads, or inanimate clothing in frustration when the jv season is over.
  20. Screem...screem into that echo chamber. It's working.. lol.
  21. Yes. It will be very high end gockey in a great environment.
  22. Sales figures suggest, he's not wrong. others as in.... the other 2 if you? Yes we have been embarrassed by your behavior for years now. It's getting old. There's 3 of you. .... and nobody is listening.
  23. F South/Shanley over Red River... dare I say... wasn't an upset??? I went in thinking GFRR by 2 so.... for now I guess it was but no longer is or will be.
×
×
  • Create New...