siouxkid12

Went to Sickies the other night, what a terrible place. Food was not good and neither was the service.

BWW is anything BUT CHEAP and the service is not even great..

Nice color combination, i think... I wonder if they paid UND for that logo?

You'd have a hard time finding any company doing current players for the exact reason EPS told you.

Follow the salary cap and you will see that Vancouver has little to no cap space. I am sure he wouldn't mind signing with the Wild but Vancouver isn't letting him go.

I'm not sure if it was talked about or not. It wouldn't be surprising that no one mentioned it due to the dislike of forum communications by some. Every since Bill Jr took over the company from his dad, it has been one terrible decision after another.

That's not "word on the street", I believe that Bill Marcil Jr came out and said that a couple weeks ago

That's what it is exactly. Kris better open her checkbook now and start donating to the University because she has gotten her last two wishes (no Kennedy and a favorable agreement).

I cant see where it says large ( I am assuming its on the tag that is folded up). In the early versions of Gemini jerseys they used a regular tag like you would find on a shirt and in the later ones they were a little tag sewn to the big Gemini logo on the right side next to the S in "USA"

UND was Gemini’s 1st jersey ever made and they first started in 95-96, so a lot of times their earlier jerseys look different. The WCHA logo was never embroidered the first few years, a lot of times it was just heat pressed on.

Nike Swift jerseys were meant to fit a bit more snug than a regular jersey (due to the material they used, that was just the way they were designed). I am pretty sure EPS did the lettering for these jerseys as they did all the jerseys at the time and I highly doubt that UND would outsource a different company for one jersey. If I recall the issue with EPS at the time was the spacing between the letters in the name. One year they had more spacing between the letters and in the following years they had the letters closer together. If you get specific (send pictures) with EPS, I am pretty positive they can get it done correctly for you.

could you take a picture of the sizing tag? Chances are with this specific year it should say L or XL or XXL. I am about 99.9% sure that is an actual game used jersey from the 96-97 year (could also be from 97-98). prices can very for these but if you can get it under $1500, I'd say buy it.

It's a team issue. So to me its nothing more than an authentic, I would put whatever name and patch on it that you wanted to. Also, if you were looking to get rid of it, I'd be interested

Did they put the FF patch on for you? Looks nice!

Who cares if he hasn't spoke to her, he has better things to do. Since she likes to call the shots, UND should just hire her as president

I own a game used one from that era and I do agree that they were kind of ugly but for as long as I have had it, it has grown on me. I think those ones are better looking than the current ones.

Wrong. The geometric logo was not introduced until the 1995-1996 season and it was used till 2001. Before that they used regular CCM jerseys with "NORTH DAKOTA" on the front.

It's what I expected. Nothing too daring but still following the rule that the university puts forth for all sports teams.

Sammy Sioux was never an official logo, so there would be no point in using it.

110% fake. logo is puffed out, strips on the jersey are inaccurate. the word "sioux" is too big and the neck colors are off. probably not even good toilet paper

It is a 100% legit replica jersey made by K1. Nothing wrong with it and for 100 bucks, its not a bad deal

The REA doesn't get to pick the logo, the university does. The university wants to have unity across all platforms and there is no reason that the REA and the hockey program get to go down a different path because they have an entitlement mentality.

Pretty sure the Lamoureux twins were not involved in this lawsuit. Also, I am pretty sure that you are the one who brought the Lamoureux twins into the discussion.

I think most thought it was on the chopping block, I just don't think anyone thought that they would've done it.

This was a terrible lawsuit. Whoever the lawyers were in this should have known better, especially when the University brings in a lawfirm that specializes in title 9 stuff. Did the university execute it poorly, ya but if it would've been dragged on we never would've seen it go away.