Bison06

I’ll believe widespread fraud when evidence is presented, if ever. Until then, isn’t it the least bit suspicious to you that every instance of fraud, however minor, up to this point has favored one side? I find that incredibly odd and unlikely and at the very least has my interest piqued.

“Don’t like it here, go back to where you came from” Guess it’s only xenophobic and tragic when it comes from the right.

What hypocrisy would that be that I have? Be specific please. I’m calling out your hypocrisy for calling trump names and then doing it to others. I don’t have a a problem with name calling, only your criticism of Trump doing it and then you doing it back to him. It’s embarrassing that you can’t understand the difference.

Again, follow along. I’m not calling people out for name-calling like you do every day. I’m simply pointing out hypocrisy.

Yeah, I had it. It was really rough having a sore throat for 36 hours.

Does this response make sense in your head? Be smarter.

I’m not the one calling people out for name-calling. You consistently make comments about Trump being a bully and a name-caller and then turn around and do the same thing. If you don’t like the way he acts, why are you acting the same way? But it’s ok because he started it. That doesn’t work with my six year old son, why would it work for an adult?

How mature of you, the “he started it” defense for your actions.

Leftist logic: trump is mean and bullies people, so I’ll continuously call him names. The hypocrisy of the tolerant left is continuously on display.

None of that matters, because Biden isn’t a meany. Apparently, being a full of !@#$ politician is a virtue to some.

I’m confused as to why you quoted me. A loss of human life is tragic, but in no way is evidence of whether the agency the person works for has the American citizens’ interests at the top of its priority list.

So if Trump rode Obama’s economic wave to have success the last four year and the recent gains are due to Biden optimism, did Trump ever really have an economy? The logic here is astounding by some.

Great, numbers are rising. I ask again, why roll out a strategy that has proven to be a failure?

Why do you and others continue to talk lockdown? Haven’t we seen enough example of its failure as a policy?

I agree that we can learn some things from Canada, but comparing the United States to any country in the world is a fool errand. The diversity of culture and how each of those cultures consumes healthcare in the United States makes it unique. I find a few things we do to be odd. One, I’m sure there was good intentions in the beginning, but I don’t like that healthcare benefits are tied to a specific job. It creates too many problems when someone is fired or just switches jobs. Benefits vary wildly from plan to plan, leading to nothing but confusion for the consumer. Second, I believe strongly that basic healthcare and preventative healthcare should be a right in our country and not a privilege. Doctors in our system do not have the time to be who they should be, teachers. Educating our youth on how to take care of their body through preventative measures and then helping them grow into healthy adults. Being there in case something goes wrong and helping to correct it. Much more in line with how dentists fit into a family’s healthcare plan. Doctors know little to nothing about nutrition and exercise protocols, which is easily the most impactful category in determining long term health outcomes. Our system is bloated and intervention heavy, not enough accountability and prevention education.

Well, I prefer people get together for Thanksgiving so yeah, I don't care one bit. My family had to cancel it's second holiday get together of the year, so I'm slightly salty about not being able to see my family for the last 8 months.

Well, let's see if it actually happens before getting too worked up over it.

In that I have played a part in the creation and execution of more than a dozen research studies in the past two decades. Yeah I'd say I know more than the average person about how research is done and how science works. Less than a ton of people, but more than the general public.

Science is no better than quackery when it is applied incorrectly. In fact, its possibly worse as at least quackery can be dismissed on it's face, whereas "science" requires some investigative work to know whether or not the findings are significant. Which 99.9% of our population doesn't have the ability or knowledge to discern.

Do you find it interesting and convenient how that narrative shifted?

Also, hilariously, how could they know how long it lasts? Remember to “trust the science”, observation is a critical component of “science” and they’ve had this vaccine all of ten minutes and somehow know how long the immunity lasts? That should be sounding alarms bells in everyone’s head.

Even the most fervent vaccination advocates will tell you that vaccination is inferior to contracting the wild virus when it comes to long term immunity. There’s no chance that the vaccination antibody response will be stronger than the wild virus. Doesn’t it say something to you about the narrative surrounding immunity that in April, May, June it was all about “well we don’t know how long immunity lasts” and now when it’s a vaccine that isn’t even a talking point?

How. Long. Does. Immunity. Last. Following. Vaccination?

ok...how about addressing my question instead of obsessing about your favorite topic. I actually responded to something you posted.

And how long is a person's immunity following vaccination? Or isn't that a conversation anymore?