Bison06

But it’s these same politicians whining that the ultra wealthy use tax shelters who wrote the tax code that allowed those shelters in the first place. Why is the government constantly trying to incentivize behaviors through the tax code. Simplify the tax code, get rid of nearly every tax incentive and let percentages take care of ultra wealthy people.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rudy-giuliani-sidney-powell-not-part-of-trumps-legal-team Fourth paragraph down. I should clarify my statement that it’s a non story. I believe it to be a non story in reference to people seeing this as further proof that it’s all unraveling. This was strategic. What for? I have no clue, but they clearly planned this together for some reason. I don’t have a Wall Street journal membership, so the best I can get is a reference to the Wall Street journal statement.

And the fact that Sidney Powell issued a statement that she agrees with Guiliani? They planned this together.

Again, read the statement for yourself, not the spin.

This seems like a non story. Read the statement.

The more I read about it, the more it seems like just a clarification that Sidney Powell has never been on Trumps personal team vs a change and her being removed.

It’s interesting, I just read the statement from the trump campaign and it’s ambiguous as to its meaning. Are they truly trying to distance themselves from her or are they simply trying to paint her as an independent “objective” lawyer who is seeking the truth. The way they worded it I could see it being either.

International Units(IU) seriously, I’d increase that to 5000 as an adult in the northern hemisphere in the winter. 2000 will prevent a deficiency, but 5000 is necessary for optimal levels

Vitamin D3 supplementation seems like a pretty easy solution.

Also making the mistake of thinking every corporation is a Fortune 500 company. Most small business are corporations with middle class owners. Raising the corporate tax rate raises taxes for these small businesses as well.

...as a general rule they are, hahaha.

Because politicians are masters of the English language. “We are not going to raise taxes on the middle class” is technically correct if your tax plan doesn’t call for an increase for that group, but instead doesn’t renew a previous administration’s cuts for that group. My favorite example of this is when a politician claims that “funding for (insert here)program has been slashed” when in reality what happened was a planned budgetary increase wasn’t approved. The budget could stay the same as it was before, but since the planned increase in budget didn’t take place, they call it a funding cut. This is why I hate politicians across the board as a general rule, they are liars and half-truth tellers. Remember when a sitting president had the audacity to utter the phrase “that depends on what your definition of the word is, is” ? Disgusting people who will say anything to get what they want. I’d trust a street hustler before I’d trust a politician.

This is a lie on its face. By sunsetting the Trump tax cuts they will be raising taxes on the middle class.

I think you may have your story book references mixed up.

Did you miss the last four years where the FBI was used as a tool against the president?

Strongly disagree with which part?

My guess is less than 1927.

And you wonder why people think you’re an asshole?

The CIA and FBI have never been the friend of the American citizen. J. Edgar Hoover used the FBI as his own personal secret police force against American citizens.

Because folks tend to move the goalposts when in doesn’t fit their narrative, I’d be interested to hear from some of the left leaning posters on what is your standard for considering election fraud? When Sidney Powell announces whatever she is planning to announce, what could she say that would make your pause and say, “wow, this really was election fraud?”

So you don’t have the science you were discussing?

You cited the tired phrase “science is real” I asked you to provide which science you speak of.

What science do you speak of? Did a landmark study showing quarantining healthy people is effective get published in JAMA or The Lancet that I missed? Please be specific about the science you are referring to.

So you want a fantasy world? 100% buy in? You wouldn’t get that in a communist nation, let alone the United States. Here in the real world, nothing we have done anywhere in the world has impacted numbers over the long haul.

Read: opposes interventions that in practice have been an utter failure and the stats back it up, while simultaneously ruin people’s lives by shutting down their businesses. Show us a single example of a place where lockdowns and masking have created a noticeable and permanent shift in the pandemic.