Oxbow6

Lots of puck possession by St Cloud in front of us. Zane solid. Would like to see Bryn and Mitch switch lines.

Colton better be less than 100% to not be in lineup. That surprises me...the lovefest with Mitch doesn't surprise me any more. Like Luke up the middle w Rocco and Drake.

4-2 Sioux. Bryn, Mark, Dillon and Rocco. And Zane is more than solid in net.

I have talked and interacted with Bohl on numerous occasions and have seen him in many social settings as well. I'm sure most of us, if not all, have some personal skeletons in the closet but I have no problem with Bohl as a man/person even though my interactions with him have been just a few in number. I think as a coach he could have been or could be more of a disciplinarian but that's a different conversation.

Obviously I didn't make my point to some on this issue clear enough but what you have posted above in a nut shell falls in line with what I was trying to convey.

Why don't you PM with all the issues you have with me and how you feel I can go about fixing them. You jumped on this site a bascially a week ago and seem to be the new resident "expert" *cough* *Watchmaker* *cough* in all areas. I basically gave my opinion on this issue. You don't have to like it or agree with it so PM and enlighten me...otherwise keep your smart ass comments to yourself.

Sounds like Drake will be in lineup tonight...amazing after witnessing his fall Saturday. My question is does Mitch play after looking ok vs. a USHL team?

The "sausage in a casing" look isn't something I'm fond of.

I thought this site got rid of it's biggest tool in Watchmaker...glad to see someone else is stepping up to filling that void. Welcome aboard!

Your new moniker should be "Lucy"...you still charging just 5 cents for your "psychiatric help"?

Don't know where to start with all of that noise...although the only fantasies I have are getting off a 3 game fantasy FB skid this week. But I got a pretty good read on you..."pussy" the cat. I'll say it one more time...from what I read I don't agree with the felony assault charge on the victim. Nothing more to it than that.

Another great effort again on your part...thanks.

To your 3 questions... yes, no idea and no. We don't have to agree on this. IMO based on the article I read I question the felony assault charge under the circumstance as the article laid them out.

He didn't kill him so what's your point? But I'll play along...no and no. I like it when some jump to extreme hypotheticals to try to get a point across when it is irrelevant to the discussion.

Hahaha...well played. Good to see you got a "pair" to make that post.

Not disagreeing. Just feel the victim when confronting the thief and seeing him trying to flee had the right to bring him to a halt from escaping. It's not like he went "Rodney King" on him.

1 GREEN and 1 pink. No moniker.

I guess if the victim would have gone "Travis Beck" on the thief's a** the discussion would be different! Bottomline...thief was caught and then took off and ran. I see no problem with the victim "subduing" the thief until the police show up in any manner he felt necessary. Just my opinion.

We will have to agree to disagree on most of what you posted above. Innocent til proven guilty...yes but that doesn't apply here. "Revolution"...no. Taking matters in your own hands in an obvious situation like this...kudos to that gentleman and the beat down he administered. Sometimes trash needs to be dealt with appropriately and hauled to the curb as it was in this situation.

+1 Yet there are some that wear them that can scar one's visual image for months!

Related to your situation, in June 2012 our home was burglarized when we were out of town for a soccer tourney. The Fargo PD did a great job AFTER I was able to piece together info from neighbors and basically tell them who did it, when it happened and how they gained access to our house. They were able to get evidence from pawn shops with ID log records and video. Two guys were convicted and one was already just released on parole a week ago.

This...^^^^^.

My bad in title of thread...this wasn't a robbery. It was theft.

This is it...

Per the Fargo Forum...a 23 year old Mapleton man steals a truck. The owner of the truck, a 57 year old Davenport man, tracks down the thief in the his stolen truck and confronts the thief. The thief trys to make a run for it and the man/victim is able to run him down and subdue him after he "beats" him with a metal pipe that he grab from his stolen truck. The thief is charged with a Class C felony for stealing the truck and the victim of the crime is also charged with a Class C felony for assault. Is this what we have become as a society?? Seems to be that those that committ crimes are increasingly getting more rights than the victims of those crimes. If you steal someone else's property and are caught by the individual that you stole from IMO a beatdown should be at the very least what you have coming.