UND92,96

I don't know whether tearing it down would be the answer, and did not mean to give that impression. I do hope that there is a long-term plan to utilize the property in a different way from how it's currently being used. I had hoped many years ago that the arena portion could be renovated and remain as the home of UND basketball, but was told it wasn't likely to ever happen due to asbestos. I can't recall from whom I got that info, though.

If I'm not mistaken, renovating Hyslop wouldn't be feasible due in large part to the cost of asbestos abatement. But you are correct in that a modernized Hyslop would have been very nice.

At least he can correctly claim that the Forum poll really was way off, after all.

New offer-- Chandler (Az) HS TE Patrick Baldenegro.

Why should the presidents need to get involved?

Looks like Haugen is indeed done: http://undathletics....-tech-transfer/ Given his position, lack of playing time this past year and the fact that he's already been on scholarship for four full years, this probably isn't much of a surprise

The only question now is: who is leaving to open up the scholarship for Nash? I have a pretty good idea, but am not going to speculate out of respect for whomever the player is.

He was a sophomore this past year.

If the Boot re-opens, it will apparently be under new ownership: http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/236623/

Per a Tom Miller tweet, Jaron Nash of Texas Tech is transferring to UND. Nash is 6'8", but is quite thin, as he was listed at just 180 pounds this past season.

I found it somewhat interesting that according to the poll, a clear majority of voters in Grand Forks, Cass and Burleigh Counties are apparently planning to vote "yes", whereas a clear majority of Ward County voters are apparently planning to vote "no". I guess Soderstrom has managed to at least convince a lot of people in his home county, although I highly doubt it will be such a landslide "no" victory in Ward County in June.

Poll shows support for retiring Fighting Sioux name: http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/236548/

There is apparently going to be an article in tomorrow's Forum regarding the results of a poll commissioned by Forum Communications of 500 likely voters on this particular issue. Today's article dealt with the poll results as they pertained to Measure 2. Should be quite interesting. http://www.thedickin...ticle/id/58042/

I just think hanging up on a Herald reporter and flat out refusing to talk simply breeds speculation as to what's going on, thereby creating PR which is at least as bad, if not worse than any alleged health department issues (which may or may not even be factual--at this point we don't know). If there are, in fact plans to re-open, it seems reasonable to simply say to the media: "repairs/renovations are being made, and we expect to re-open in X weeks." The way it was handled suggests they have something to hide, and/or they're permanently closed. EDIT: A more detailed Herald article has now been posted, confirming the health department issues due to a leaky roof: http://www.grandfork...icle/id/236146/

I hope it does re-open, but this Herald article makes it sound like nobody wanted to comment--why so secretive if it is just an issue with a leaky roof?: http://www.grandfork...icle/id/236146/

I must admit I wasn't a frequent visitor, but this is kind of sad given how long they had been in business.

Agreed--SCSU has shown they are quite willing to drop football.

I think both UMD and GVSU place too high of a priority on football to go dI and join the Summit unless there's a guarantee the MVFC would take them, too. I suspect the Summit needs to focus on prospective members without football, or who are willing to drop football a la UNO.

So if Oakland and IUPUI bolt for the Horizon, what's the Summit's next move? Besides Chicago State, it doesn't seem like they have many options.

The odd thing is that according to Vandrovec, not all SDSU coaches were even aware of this policy, at least before today. Since nothing has even been discussed internally at SDSU about UND and the nickname in the past several months (per Sell), it's unclear why this issue even came up today.

Traylor has signed: http://www.fightingsioux.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=13500&ATCLID=205422355

It's not cancelled, according to a tweet by Terry Vandrovec. SDSU plans on honoring existing contracts.

While the secondary is fairly inexperienced, I agree with the assessment of geaux_sioux that things probably appeared worse than what they really are in the spring game due to the fact that unlike past years where is it was just offense vs. defense, this year there were two presumably evenly-split teams. So at no point did we see the starting secondary playing together. Daryl Brown is a potential star, and Mersereau is a freakishly good athlete, so we're already halfway to a pretty solid secondary. I suspect we still may see a transfer or two at the safety positions if the staff isn't completely confident that some of the younger players can get the job done in the fall. The bottom line is that while it would probably be overstating things to say this group will necessarily be one of the team's strengths, I do expect that Boyd and whomever else will be coaching the secondary this fall will have them ready to play at a higher level than what we've seen the past few years.

http://www.grandfork...4/group/Sports/

Benton is getting Mitchell's scholarship. 11 of the 13 scholies will be tied up in the junior and senior classes next year. Kind of an odd situation, to say the least.