Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

burd

Members
  • Posts

    5,722
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Posts posted by burd

  1. Yes Blais' teams had speed but they were some of the best cycling teams in the country. Opponents were so tired in the third from the relentless cycle his teams used.

    So why so much hate on Hak's teams that cycle?

    One thing Blais did better than any other: Pick successors.

    • Upvote 1
  2. Did they wife or was our defensive stick work good...seemed like our net-front presence was good on both ends last night.

    Our stickwork was great last night, and the boys won puck battles they have been losing. But PC just wiffed on several golden chances.

    The aggressive forecheck last night set the tone.

  3. If there is such a think as a best loss, I'd pick the back to back OT losses against UW in Madison in January of 2000. I believe the teams were tied for first, and the atmosphere was electric. Sioux lost, but some very exciting hockey, and a great comeback to get the OT on Friday (I think). Strangely, I left both games feeling juiced up instead of heartbroken. Maybe you could sense good things were in store for that team. Sioux waxed the Badgers in the Final Five.

  4. Poolmans goal was about as good a play as I've seen a UND defenseman make in a long long time. Complete control of the puck and situation and finished like a cold blooded assassin. We pounded those poor guys last night. They weren't ready for that, tonight they'll be expecting it so it should get interesting.

    PC also wiffed on several open nets last night, which we can't count on happening again.

  5. Other than that, how did you like the play, Mrs. Lincoln

    I think you miss my point, Irish. If the coach, whoever it is, does everything you expect of him but fails to win the NC, some people demand he be replaced for that reason alone. Another coach could do virtually the same thing as a coach, get a few bounces, and win two NCs in the same period of time and folks would call for his induction into the hockey hall of fame. It is stupifyingly obvious that results count: most of us live with that in our work. But those who cling to that one factor without identifying what it is about Hak's (or anyone else's) actual coaching and without identifying someone who would come and who would do those things better, it's all just white noise.

    The difference between a great coach and a failed coach is not a bad bounce or a pipe. That may be the difference between a great season ending and heartache, for sure. For some fans, it's more about the bragging rights of a NC than it is about watching good, well coached hockey year after year. And I've never understood that, since we fans do nothing but sit and watch and bloviate here and other places but have nothing to brag about ourselves. (Giving Gopher fans shat about the Banner count has a value, though, no question)

    Now, criticizing Hak for his actual on-ice coaching and saying he should be replaced because of it is another matter, and some do focus on the coaching itself and not simply on the Banner count. I've been critical of his game coaching in the past, thinking he could even be the best program coach UND has ever had but he's not quite there as a game coach. But I don't really know enough about the college game at this point to say much more than that, so it's pretty empty criticism too.

    • Upvote 1
  6. Watching pregame. Hammer. The guy just seems like nothing about hockey comes naturally for him but he tries so hard. It makes me like him more. He's like the walk-on who becomes a fan favorite because of his attitude not because of his talent level.

    Who else has a Hammer?

    Here's hoping for a traditional circle of sticks on Saturday.

×
×
  • Create New...