tnt

I don't look at you as being close to objective either, and you are on an opposing board. Sagard and Greyeagle are gopher fans that demonstrate respect and objectivity, which makes it nice to have their perspective.

I think we both know the answer to this. To blame Kessel for the Holy Cross loss or somehow suggest that particular game somehow diminished him compared to Toews and Oshie is ludicrous. By that same logic, Zach Parise couldn't hold Vanek's jock, and we know that isn't true. I know this is a Sioux board, but it would be nice if there was a least a hint of objectivity.

I'm not sure, but was Bochenski even on the top two lines of the Blackhawks? I am not so sure Kessel would be a regular on the top two lines of the Bruins either. I can see him having a lot of powerplay time, but unless he adds a ton of scoring punch right away, the defensive liability for a team that doesn't score a lot to begin with might not be that wise. Like I said, if he was able to score a lot right away, the defensive aspect could be overlooked to some degree. I guess time will tell.

Where is the idiot legislator from Fargo who tried to get the state to force UND to play NDSU. Brilliant!

I'm sure the coaches aren't going to take it for granted. History has shown it isn't wise to count your recruits before they hatch, I mean sign.

They must have caught the error then, because in my paper it says Warroad forward who is big and strong.

Are you talking about the listing of NHL draft prospects? That is the only spot where I saw Marvin's name. Just above his name was Forney's, and it said he signed with UND, but no mention of Marvin committing in that listing anyway.

Don't forget about Matt Watkins. I don't mind the Sioux returning to the years of the "speed kills" motto.

At first glance, Shea Hamilton doesn't look like a player with a huge offensive upside. But we all know that numbers aren't always how you judge a player, and can sometimes be deceiving. Could be the case with him as well, as you can probably multiply his point totals by three, considering the system and the number of goals Alaska puts up as a team.

Funny thing about Erik Felde from Vernon. Heisenberg has him as a left defenseman committed to Alaska Anchorage, and the British Columbia site has him as a forward committed to Fairbanks. Which is it?

Let's not forget that other than a few games, the 3rd period collapse to Denver and the BC loss being the most disappointing, UND rarely gave up more than 2 goals in any particular game after the lopsided loss to Minnesota in January. Obviously, if they can play that kind of defense, they will be in most games and should have enough scoring punch to win a lot of games. We were constantly reminded by gopher fans how much better their freshmen defensmen would be from year one to year two, I would expect the same, if not more from our defensemen, especially because of their incredible youth. Not many, in fact no, 25-year old Canadians back at defense to fill the experience gap. Expect their confidence will be very high after the late-season run, and the fact that they will be counted on as leaders, instead of taking the passive role as most freshmen.

You know I've seen so much creative accounting, that I don't know if I'd believe numbers any college put out for public consumption. Some may just choose to be honest about it. UND could very well have a deficit, but that could be true of a very large percentage of schools who just choose to sweep it under the rug and hide expenses here and there. I would be willing to bet that some universities have the same people working on their books that count attendance at events.

I think UND would be perfectly content to stay in DII if the conference was as viable as it was when it was a ten team league. NDSU, Northern Colorado and SDSU really hurt the league and worthy replacements are nowhere to be found. NDSU took the dive leaving a great conference and situation based on the premise that scholarships would be cut, which they haven't as of yet. UND wasn't about to jump into the cold ocean until it was certain that the ship was sinking, which it now unfortunately is, thanks to the fractures inflicted by the aforementioned teams. Can it be saved? Sure, but it will never sail the way the NCC used to, when it was the best conference in DII.

Let's not forget that UND could have picked up a good chunk of change the last two years if they were already in DI by making the Frozen Four in hockey. Not sure exactly how much they would have gained, but it must be fairly substantial since it is talked about quite a bit. True, it can't be budgeted year after year, but it is revenue that NDSU could never hope to obtain. Keep arguing Aff, preoccupation is the sincerest form of flattery, and right now you are flattering the heck out of the University of North Dakota.

Yet you come on to this board and expect anyone to think you are objective? At least those publications are removed from the Alumni/Fan bias we see on boards like this. I'm sure you will give us the name of an objective publication on such matters -- provided it corresponds with something you want to hear.

In the past I've stated my displeasure with the Athletic Department changing the playing field a couple of years after the transition to the new arena. In other words, I would have taken advantage of being high on the totem pole as far as transition points to get to pick early on, had I known I would have to pay the extra Fighting Sioux Club bucks down the line anyways. If they keep changing the requirements for the clubs, I hope they keep that in mind and don't put additional burden on people not expecting to join the club in the first place. After a few years to reflect on it, it doesn't make that big of impact on the budget, but it still strikes you in a negative way. I know that I just cut out my attendance at other sports, especially those games that I attended in the past solely to support the team when I knew a blowout was in order. I no longer shell out money to attend those games. When it is treated just like a business from the Athletic Department, the fans will follow suit in many cases. I realize the Athletic Department have to do what they have to do, but they should also realize the same of the fans, and that there are only so many entertainment dollars that can go around, especially with the addition of women's hockey, nevermind the time constraints. I will always attend all of the hockey games, but a season ticket looks less appealing with no Minnesota series at home. Wish the Athletic Department could find a way to work with the WCHA to change that. That is the only series that they make money on standing room tickets. I guess the bottom line is that if we don't buy season hockey tickets someone else will. Hopefully that will always be the case, but you can see it wasn't true of men's basketball when they have struggled.

Tim and Swygg are the only station that even talk about Sioux sports with any regularity at all. We have the Coaches show and they talk about Sioux sports quite a bit, as well as having a contest every week during the season and ticket giveaways on a frequent basis. If you want to ruin coverage of Sioux sports, give it to another station and have to deal with a Dan Terhaar as an announcer again. He was certainly an adequate announcer, but nowhere near Hennessey in knowledge of Sioux hockey. I laugh when I see Terhaar doing the Wild games, because that is truly a "who you know" situation.

Actually, I think UND was in much better position to give UNI a game last year than this. Don't get me wrong, I think the Sioux could end up being pretty good, but it will take a while for the defense to come around having lost such veterans as Digger Anderson, Danny Gagner, etc.

Agreed. Just for the record, who is it you would have wanted them to hire?

The smaller players like Glen Klotz, Corey Howe, Curtis Murphy, Russ Parent and Robbie Bina are some of my favorite players. The thing I liked the most about Klotz, Murphy and Parent was that they were well versed in a lost art in college hockey today -- the hip check. I loved seeing the opposition flipping head over heels. It may be a little tougher pinning a guy like Drew Stafford to the glass for a smaller player, but most small players are great positionally, and a lot of times just getting in front of the opposition is half the battle. Add to that the fact that they also make up for size by making great outlet passes in the transition game, and you can see that there is still plenty room in college hockey and in the Sioux lineup for the smaller D-Men. That said, a nice mix on defense of physical players and offensive ability would be ideal, especially if they came in the same package.

He did stay loyal to UND, but sometimes loyal to a fault, can be a fault, I now understand that too!!!! I really wish he would publicly come out and say what happened, from beginning to end, because future coaches, and our fans need to know!!!!!!!

I am a firm believer in what comes around goes around, so while I was happy Holy Cross took Minnesota out, I wouldn't rub it in. I would be the type of person that would wear the Holy Cross T-shirt under my Sioux jersey, then when I hear some obnoxious gopher fan spouting off about Mariucci West or something of the sort, I would give them a means of coming down from their high horse.

I find it interesting that everyone is so sure that they screwed up royaly. How many actually know much about all of these candidates? It is possible they screwed up, but I would be willing to bet that no matter who they pick and who they could have picked that everyone will be saying that they should have picked someone else if the Sioux are losing anyways. Just remember that sentiment was that the powers that be screwed up by choosing Gino Gasparini over Ned Harkness. Gasparini only turned the hockey program into a perennial powerhouse. I hope that whoever they pick will have at least some support and a window to make the changes they deem necessary to make the Sioux contenders in the region and nationally every year -- that is if they stay DII.

I wonder if we are just talking about a player that adds depth, like Alexander and Walski from last year, or a recruit with a scholarship offer.

Maybe he can't. Maybe #1 Hak Fan is Hakstol himself, and would therefore be breaking recruiting rules.