Midwestern Hawk

I have not seen it yet. he looked one way on a couple plays but that was practiced.

ITs bad and has been getting worse.

Tell me the next time tommy does NOT throw to his first read

Hey! Looks like we are just playing football on 3rd and short! yes!

Yep, we need an answer.

Not good.

X2 this drive....yikes.

That was FUGLY...

Nice run by Tommy. Need 4-6 of those today!

Yep. Need to make a move on this drive O!

Now lets score!

That is crazy.

Can't ask for much better on the 20th of November.

Just not 3rd and 4th and short......

Yep, Tommy also needs to put lots of loft to get it downfield, like the toss to Boltmann last week. Gave other DB time to get over the top, if not for a great play by #4 it would have been picked off.

Watch today's game and if Danny has him throw a deep ball, watch the velocity or lack of, and compare it to other QB's.

Wasn't the point. Don't forget Danny brings Q in to throw Hail Mary's AND to throw the winning TD last week at the end of the game, yet you still lie to your self and pretend opposing DC are somehow threatened with Tommy's dynamic abilities to throw bubble screens and 4 yard crossing patterns. If we score 4 offensive TD's in Brookings today we very, very likely win, Vegas thinks are chances are very, very slim. Football is not rocket science.

When I use the term "deep throw", I'm using it in the context of stretching the defense vertically. YOu are correct cross field throws can be very long throws in distance, but are not about stretching the defense. If Tommy makes a throw 25 yards downfield from LOS today, let me know how you think it went.

I would say any throw which travels over 25 yards from the LOS. In all actuality he has not thrown many at all this season. I think last Saturday he attempted 2, but I will rewatch to confirm that. One to Boltmann and one to Richter.

Yes sir!

I just feel like this was a window to make the leap. Otis, Waletzko and the defense. Otis is currently engaged, but that could change at any moment. Waletzko will be difficult to replace and lots of defenders(Canady, Shannon, Sequin, Holm, Turner, Haas, Galvin, and maybe Larson and Morrison. Not sure on the last two.) to replace. The good thing is Bubba and co have done a good job recruiting and the base and depth of the team is much better than it was after the 2016 season.

Totally agree, we are missing speed at WR. Looking back at the spring, if we played SDSU in the playoffs and they had their QB healthy and they had film on us, there is very little chance we win.

I want UND to get to that next step as badly as anyone. I thought at the beginning of the fall season we were extremely close and the results have largely proven that as true. Overall the defense has been good enough to win the MVFC and be a high seed in the playoffs, the offense has not, and the game management has not. Next fall IMO will be much tougher to achieve that with so many holes to fill on defense. Maybe the offense will be good enough to carry the team next fall or the defense will not experience any fall off or be even better. I just think we had a window to make a run and we blew it, I felt the same in 2016 after the Richmond game.

No, Danny put Quincy in the game so the RB would be wide open, with Tommy in he would not be open, or do you think Danny replaced Tommy on that play just for kicks?

Against teams with equal or better personnel, the offensive line will not be good enough to compensate for a QB who won't run and struggles throwing deep. You guys will destroy me for it, but a DC will find game planning vs Q(or any QB who can/will run), even if he struggles throwing sometimes, more difficult than for Tommy. There is a reason Danny had Q throw the game winner vs ISU and not Tommy. As for the spring season, the offense was clearly struggling towards the end of the season when playing teams with equal or better personnel.