F'nHawks

Trey is definitely cooking. Just hope the rest can stay into it. Sometimes it’s tough when it’s just one guy has it going on the offensive side. As we’re seeing by all the fouls.

Both injury related?

Pemberton too.

Definite yes to the green helmet, green jersey, and white pants. Now that we have the new green jersey tops I would think that should be the standard home uniform. While I don't personally love the look of the green/green/black combo, I can appreciate the retro feel it has to teams of the 90s.

And Seidl might be the best of the bunch. Not a knock against any of them. I think they are all solid and it’s great to have them all here! Hope for more games where they all find the endzone.

You’re not wrong. But probably something to be said that Bo can put up a stat line like that with a QB that is still figuring it out. And, Bo chose to stay so I think he wants to be here and hope that he’s happy with the start to season. He made some plays on 3rd downs against Cyclones, great team W against Griz, and then a game where he sets D1 receptions record and got another W with good stats to boot. My guess is he’s feeling OK right now. But certainly can’t say I know for sure.

Yes. 8-165-1 should do it.

It's interesting that Tennessee State plays NDSU in Fargo second game of next season

Why isn’t Hurst playing tonight?

Nice! Hope they have a uniform set to match. Not sure any current set would like quite right...

Not a great photoshop job, but happy to see him in a NORTH Dakota uniform, and I will say I think I kinda like that white facemask...

If the argument is that 5.25 yards per rush attempt is good, then wouldn't it need to be acknowledged that the "quirks" to our offense that you mentioned would be a contributing factor to that average? I don't disagree that there may have been times when a more straightforward playcall might have produced a better result. But, I don't know that we can completely oversimplify and expect to average 5.25 yards per attempt if we made dramatic changes to the offensive scheme (i.e. completely eliminate the "quirks" and "trick" plays). I think the plays within Danny's offense are good. But, probably room for improvement on the timing of certain playcalls and making sure the personnel involved are the right guys to execute the play being called. Of course, we're all frustrated with the record right now. But, I don't think things are as bad as it may seem at the moment...

How is a hamstring pull reflective of leadership? I can maybe hear what you're saying with Weah's situation, but we still don't have all the details, and one could also argue that holding him out of games is at least an attempt to teach...just my thoughts

And Team 6 beat Team 2 Everything points to the "quality" of your losses as being more important than your victories and the strength/quality of those victories. Is Team 6's win over Team 2 helping Team 2 more than it is Team 6??? It's a quality loss for Team 2, but "just" a win for Team 6...

Looking at STATS FCS poll and it appears losses must be analyzed as the differentiating factor, or at least carry more weight than wins. I removed team names, but kept them in order (#11, #12, #17, #18, #21, #22). Team 1 - 3 losses, 6 wins against teams with combined record 17-37 Team 2 - 3 losses, 6 wins against teams with combined record 18-37, beat Team 3 Team 3 - 3 losses, 5 wins (FCS) against teams with combined record 23-22 Team 4 - 3 losses, 6 wins against teams with combined record 19-34 Team 5 - 4 losses, 5 wins against teams with combined record 19-26 Team 6 - 3 losses, 5 wins against teams with combined record 21-23, beat Team 2 Seems UND has recently been a team that carries a couple quality wins to go along with a couple ugly losses so that probably impacts my opinion, but am wondering why it isn't a team's wins that are given more weight. To me, a team that has one or two bad performances but has beaten a handful of higher quality opponents deserves a higher ranking than one who can only seem to beat the lower quality teams.