nodakvindy Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 UND wins out Wisconsin loses out Denver and CC split next weekend. UND and Denver would be tied with 34 points and Sioux would win the tiebreaker with a 3-1 head-to-head record. IF CC loses tomorrow night against UMD, then they could sweep Denver and the Sioux would finish in sole possession of 2nd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 UND wins out Wisconsin loses out Denver and CC split next weekend. UND and Denver would be tied with 34 points and Sioux would win the tiebreaker with a 3-1 head-to-head record. IF CC loses tomorrow night against UMD, then they could sweep Denver and the Sioux would finish in sole possession of 2nd. That's great except for the fact that my brother's squirt team could beat Duluth right now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwing77 Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 That's great except for the fact that my brother's squirt team could beat Duluth right now... I think the worst squirt team in North Carolina could beat them right now unfortunately. Yeah, UND won't finish #2. I don't think they'll finish #3. We have a chance at #4 but that's about it. The question I have is: Which would be better for the PWR, playing SCSU or CC in the play in game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 I think the worst squirt team in North Carolina could beat them right now unfortunately. Yeah, UND won't finish #2. I don't think they'll finish #3. We have a chance at #4 but that's about it. The question I have is: Which would be better for the PWR, playing SCSU or CC in the play in game? Assuming we make the Final Five, I would much rather play St. Clown in the Play-In game...they just came off a sweep by Mankato...they are beatable and we are scoring goals in bunches... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoggy Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 How about facing UW again and winning? Should give us the common opponents on Ohio State. Plus UW is still highly ranked in the PWR. It would be a win on a neutral site. Big points to be earned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakotadan Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 I don't think we need to get this far ahead of ourselves. Let's just focus on winning tomorrow nights game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoggy Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 I don't think we need to get this far ahead of ourselves. Let's just focus on winning tomorrow nights game. That would be for the team. I think as fans we need to look ahead. It helps me to know who to root for when watching other games. Plus it gives us something to talk/write about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCHA_Fan Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 I don't think we need to get this far ahead of ourselves. Let's just focus on winning tomorrow nights game. Amen One game at a time, heck one period at a time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLW4GOPHERS Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 wow, 6-2 win at DU. You guys must have played well. I have said all along that I don't want to go to ND for the play-offs and face ND on their home ice. The way the BADgers are sinking, maybe the Gophers will go to GB and the BADgers will get sent to ND. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimdahl Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 If you want to talk pure mathematical possibilities, WCHA possibilities is what it looked like before Friday night's games. I never did bother to make that work between games... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supertrex Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Amen One game at a time, heck one period at a time Yes, that would be great, but last time I checked, I wasn't in the line up...so I say, let's have fun and speculate and leave the "game faces" to the players... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLSiouxPhan Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Yes, that would be great, but last time I checked, I wasn't in the line up...so I say, let's have fun and speculate and leave the "game faces" to the players... I agree with all of the above. Let's let the players concentrate on their game faces and no more two/three games at a time (I don't have Picture-In-Picture) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.