The Sicatoka Posted January 16, 2006 Author Posted January 16, 2006 Would the MIAA consider adding 3 schools? Missouri-Rolla bailed out on them recently leaving them at 9. The nice numbers for scheduling are 10 or 12. There's the philosophy; would they add three is a question only they have the answer to. Adding 1 to get back to 10 seems like an easy one to answer, and UNO has made MIAA noises in the past. The question that the MIAA would have to consider is do they want to go to 12 and have Augie and USD as a travel pair (if Augie and USD were interested)? Quote
star2city Posted January 16, 2006 Posted January 16, 2006 Missouri-Rolla bailed out on them recently leaving them at 9. The nice numbers for scheduling are 10 or 12. There's the philosophy; would they add three is a question only they have the answer to. Adding 1 to get back to 10 seems like an easy one to answer, and UNO has made MIAA noises in the past. The question that the MIAA would have to consider is do they want to go to 12 and have Augie and USD as a travel pair (if Augie and USD were interested)? Fort Hays State to MIAA With Ft Hays St joining the MIAA, that conference should be back at 10. Either a combo of UNO/UNK or UNO/USD would likely be very tempting if the MIAA moved to 12. Quote
bincitysioux Posted January 16, 2006 Posted January 16, 2006 I don't think that USD would try to gain membership in the MIAA. They were one of the four the schools that voted in favor of a DI NCC. I tend to believe that their preference would be to stay with the state-named schools, which means they'll follow whatever UND does. If UND, SCSU, and UNO did end up leaving the NCC for either a different division or conference, and USD decided not to move to DI, I think they'd stand pat in the NCC/NSIC, as they would become the dominant program. I also think it is unlikely that Augustana would pursue MIAA membership. If UND, SCSU, USD, and UNO were out of the picture, they could become a force in a league made up of the NCC and NSIC teams. I think Auggie would fit very nicely into the current NSIC. Quote
star2city Posted January 17, 2006 Posted January 17, 2006 I don't think that USD would try to gain membership in the MIAA. They were one of the four the schools that voted in favor of a DI NCC. I tend to believe that their preference would be to stay with the state-named schools, which means they'll follow whatever UND does. If UND, SCSU, and UNO did end up leaving the NCC for either a different division or conference, and USD decided not to move to DI, I think they'd stand pat in the NCC/NSIC, as they would become the dominant program. I also think it is unlikely that Augustana would pursue MIAA membership. If UND, SCSU, USD, and UNO were out of the picture, they could become a force in a league made up of the NCC and NSIC teams. I think Auggie would fit very nicely into the current NSIC. IMO, UND would not be going to the trouble of having a public DI committee review the merits of DI vs DII if something serious was not already brewing in the background. UND is the school most vulnerable geographically - it can't afford to let the NCC die unless it is the first to jump ship. UND has already seriously studied the details of a DI for a number of years. A conference affiliation and money have always held UND back. At least one of those is no longer an issue. USD may not have a choice but be separated from state-named schools: they have the most limiting facilities, the lowest funding, the least enrollment, and reside in a "city" that is barely more than USD. For USD, a DI NCC might have been one of the few conceivable manners in which they could make DI a go without a major sugar daddy. Quote
star2city Posted January 17, 2006 Posted January 17, 2006 If UND announces a DI move this summer, there will be at least one "classmate." Today, Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) announced that they will be moving to DI: http://www.news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar...S/60117007/1075 They don't have an official conference invite, but the Atlantic Sun will likely take them. Other related stories: UC-Davis finds Division I daring Decision Day for FGCU Quote
IowaBison Posted January 18, 2006 Posted January 18, 2006 A conference affiliation and money have always held UND back. At least one of those is no longer an issue. ? Quote
The Sicatoka Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 More on Portland State's transition to DI: http://www.in-forum.com/articles/index.cfm...§ion=Sports Quote
star2city Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 ? Seems like FGCU only committed to DI because their was strong informal assurances that they would receive an Atlantic Sun conference bid: FGCU banking on A-Sun invitation (FGCU) Athletic director Carl McAloose said FGCU would not have gone to D-I without strong assurance of a conference invitation. Quote
star2city Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 More on Portland State's transition to DI: [url="http://www.in-forum.com/articles/index.cfm?id=114877 Quote
bincitysioux Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 I agree that unfortunately baseball and softball will be the first casualties of a DI move. But if the Big Sky is the ultimate goal, I think golf and tennis will remain. Quote
coachdags Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 I agree that unfortunately baseball and softball will be the first casualties of a DI move. But if the Big Sky is the ultimate goal, I think golf and tennis will remain. Does UND Going Div 1.... Help NDSU Chances for Big Sky?....I have been told many time by several People From the Big Sky, Mostly AD's that the Big Sky has absolutley not intention for future expansion any farther east Then UNC....? Quote
sioux89 Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 A few items to refute or add on. UNO would likely join the MIAA if the NCC falls apart. At a little later date they perhaps (with the Board of Regents approval) look towards DivIAA football (and DI everything else). UNO has been courted several times by the MIAA. Auggie has flirted with the idea of going DIII if costs continue to escalate. Mankato is interested in DIAA, but the major indication would be if the NCC goes. The same is true for SCSU. UMD just got here, no clue on their Chancellors thoughts. Other than her trying to stay out of trouble with hockey behavior toward the visiting teams... USD stuggles financially as it is, however renewing a rivalry with SDSU would be a good thing for the pocketbook, so DIAA is an option. The UND/NDSU option is appealing to about half of the big sky schools. The fear is that the league would split east/west which destroys the main rivalries (and revenue) for the schools out west. They need the Montana rivalry to fill the coffers. Phil Harmeson talks a good game but in reality has made more enemies than friends in the Big Sky conference. His law degree, while impressive, doesn't compensate for his demeaner when dealing with others outside UND (and some within). Just my thoughts. Did I come close? Quote
bincitysioux Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 The UND/NDSU option is appealing to about half of the big sky schools. The fear is that the league would split east/west which destroys the main rivalries (and revenue) for the schools out west. They need the Montana rivalry to fill the coffers. That is why the key to the 12 team 2 division Big Sky is to put Montana in the western division and Montana St in the eastern division. Then assign them as permanent rivals, so that they play every year, which is what the SEC does with Auburn and Georgia. That keeps Montana fans happy, keeps the western schools (by keeping Montana on the schedule). The eastern schools would still get Montana St. every year, and Montana every 2 or 3 years. Also, if the Big Sky ever decided to play a championship game, this would make it possible for Montana and Montana St. to meet in the title game. WEST DIVSION Montana Idaho St Eastern Washington Portland ST Sacramento St Northern Arizona EAST DIVISION Montana St Weber St Northern Colorado SDSU NDSU UND Quote
coachdags Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 Once again from what I hear from the Ad's at Sac St., N.Az., MSU, that the Presidents have declared they have NO INTENTIONS for future expansion east of UNC....? Costs of travel being main reason...They have plenty of schools to chose from out West if Expansion is warranted.....? Quote
star2city Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 Once again from what I hear from the Ad's at Sac St., N.Az., MSU, that the Presidents have declared they have NO INTENTIONS for future expansion east of UNC....? Costs of travel being main reason...They have plenty of schools to chose from out West if Expansion is warranted.....? Other than Southern Utah, there are no other western teams ready for IAA football. (Cal Poly and UC-Davis do not want entrance into the BSC.) Western Washington and Central Washington may be capable of being BSC members sometime in the future, but not now. Quote
star2city Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 The UND/NDSU option is appealing to about half of the big sky schools. The fear is that the league would split east/west which destroys the main rivalries (and revenue) for the schools out west. They need the Montana rivalry to fill the coffers. Phil Harmeson talks a good game but in reality has made more enemies than friends in the Big Sky conference. His law degree, while impressive, doesn't compensate for his demeaner when dealing with others outside UND (and some within). Just my thoughts. Did I come close? Interesting post, sioux89. You confirm that Harmeson has indeed been talking with members of the Big Sky conference. Whether or not UND does indeed gain DI conference acceptance is largely dependent upon him, not Buning. Quote
star2city Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 That is why the key to the 12 team 2 division Big Sky is to put Montana in the western division and Montana St in the eastern division. Then assign them as permanent rivals, so that they play every year, which is what the SEC does with Auburn and Georgia. That keeps Montana fans happy, keeps the western schools (by keeping Montana on the schedule). The eastern schools would still get Montana St. every year, and Montana every 2 or 3 years. Also, if the Big Sky ever decided to play a championship game, this would make it possible for Montana and Montana St. to meet in the title game. WEST DIVSION Montana Idaho St Eastern Washington Portland ST Sacramento St Northern Arizona EAST DIVISION Montana St Weber St Northern Colorado SDSU NDSU UND With that arrangment, there are a number of very awkward travel partners. If the Montana schools have to split up, this scenario makes more sense: West Montana - EWash Portland St- Sac St Weber St - N Ariz East UND-NDSU SDSU-UNC Mont St - Idaho St For any expansion to happen toward the east, the U of Montana has to force the issue with a near ultimatum: either get more Dakota flagships schools in the conference to enhance our rivalries - otherwise, adios, we'll go DIA football and join the WAC. If Montana left, Montana St would almost be forced into a quick stadium expansion and follow. Port St, N Ariz, and Sac St. would then flee a disintegrating Big Sky to join the Big West and play football in the Great West with Davis and Poly and SUU. Those three could all move if UND, NDSU, and SDSU get added or if Montana moves to IA. Net Effect: New Big Sky Montana Montana St E Wash Weber St Idaho St UNC UND NDSU SDSU USD (later) New Great West Sac St Davis Poly SUU N Ariz Portland St Western Wash (later) Quote
NDSU grad Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 How do you think this proposal affects any future UND plans? Quote
IowaBison Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 Does UND Going Div 1.... Help NDSU Chances for Big Sky? I doubt it. It might hurt SDSU. Quote
IowaBison Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 They need the Montana rivalry to fill the coffers. The key isn't Montana/Montana St., the key is Montana/[insert Big Sky Conference Member other than Montana Here]. Montana is the biggest name in DIAA, I don't see a case where folks would like to stop having the Griz visit them every other year. Quote
IowaBison Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 Interesting post, sioux89. You confirm that Harmeson has indeed been talking with members of the Big Sky conference. Whether or not UND does indeed gain DI conference acceptance is largely dependent upon him, not Buning. It's entirely dependent on the President's desire to expand eastward. UND's athletic program speaks for itself. Quote
sioux89 Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 It's entirely dependent on the President's desire to expand eastward. UND's athletic program speaks for itself. This big sky issue has a small part with MSU, the key is Montana. The league is not just based on football. Montana brings the big fans for all the schools. Contrary to belief, some of the schools listed as against the league expansion are not excatly true. NAU & Sac are not against the move with the dakotas, others are, as I stated earlier. There are many aspects of the NCC that the BS likes but can't necessarily pass due to league legislative procedures. There is no doubt that the addition of NDSU and UND have much to offer in regards to national recognition and television time, which is the reality of bringing in revenue. That being said, the institutional votes are cast by the president or chancellors not the AD's. So, the whole process is bogged down at that point. And, once again, I will state clearly for the record that Philly has distrubted that opportunity more than you can imagine. Even NDSU would be better off without him at this point. If you don't believe it just ask. Finally, the Big Sky will not disolve because of FB. It is a feather in their hat, but at the DIAA level, basketball brings in the money with the revenue sharing and for that reason alone FB will not cause the league to break apart. Once again, just my thoughts.... Quote
sioux89 Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 QUOTE(sioux89 @ Jan 20 2006, 01:49 AM) The UND/NDSU option is appealing to about half of the big sky schools. The fear is that the league would split east/west which destroys the main rivalries (and revenue) for the schools out west. They need the Montana rivalry to fill the coffers. That is why the key to the 12 team 2 division Big Sky is to put Montana in the western division and Montana St in the eastern division. Then assign them as permanent rivals, so that they play every year, which is what the SEC does with Auburn and Georgia. That keeps Montana fans happy, keeps the western schools (by keeping Montana on the schedule). The eastern schools would still get Montana St. every year, and Montana every 2 or 3 years. Also, if the Big Sky ever decided to play a championship game, this would make it possible for Montana and Montana St. to meet in the title game. WEST DIVSION Montana Idaho St Eastern Washington Portland ST Sacramento St Northern Arizona EAST DIVISION Montana St Weber St Northern Colorado SDSU NDSU UND The only major issue with this proposal, which I must admit is good, is that Weber won't go for it. As I said earlier, legistlative league procedure make it ALMOST impossible. That being said, where is Southern Utah? Quote
bincitysioux Posted January 22, 2006 Posted January 22, 2006 In a round-about way, NDSU's win over Wisconsin in basketball could have a substantial effect on UND's future and the Division classification issue. Obviously I understand that this is only one game but it could have an impact on how NDSU athletics are perceived by the conferences in which NDSU has been trying to gain membership in. Big Sky commissioner Doug Fullerton recently has stated that he is unhappy with the RPI of the Big Sky members. With this win, NDSU's RPI is now higher than all but two Big Sky schools, and higher than all but one Mid-Con school. Does that make NDSU more attractive to these conferences? I don't know. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted January 22, 2006 Author Posted January 22, 2006 NDSU's RPI can't hurt them in presenting themselves. From what I've heard, SCSU is serious in this look at DI that they've undertaken. Methinks this will be a most interesting spring for many. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.