Having too many players no longer reviewable after goals on ensuing play

[cowboys5xsbs]

https://www.ncaa.org/news/2023/8/10/media-center-having-too-many-players-no-longer-reviewable-after-goals-on-ensuing-play.aspx

[cowboys5xsbs]

Figured this was going to change eventually.  Too bad it screwed us in a tournament game.  

[tnt]

50 minutes ago, cowboys5xsbs said:

Figured this was going to change eventually.  Too bad it screwed us in a tournament game.  

What game was that?

[Sodbuster]

BU game in Fargo.

[tnt]

47 minutes ago, Sodbuster said:

BU game in Fargo.

But it sounds like offsides is still reviewable.

[Sodbuster]

I guess I don't know?

[burd]

10 hours ago, tnt said:

But it sounds like offsides is still reviewable.

I thought the BU call was offsides  . . .

[Blackheart]

1 hour ago, burd said:

I thought the BU call was offsides  . . .

That’s how I remember it…

[Snake]

The BU goal was overturned for offsides.  This play led to the rule change nullifying the offside if the defending team gains possession and an opportunity to clear the zone. 

[tnt]

3 hours ago, burd said:

I thought the BU call was offsides  . . .

Yes, it was.  That’s why I was confused about the reference when too many men was the main topic, but they also talked about offsides, but that still appears to be reviewable.

[Sweethockey]

vs BU in Fargo was an offsides call on us even though possession had changed. There was a rule generated for that and I believe it ( the rule) was removed last summer. I was mistaken too. This is supposed to be about too many men call after a goal?