darell1976 Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 Idaho 36 UND 18 Half UND 6-28 FG, 1-7 3pt YUCK!! Need a big second half.
darell1976 Posted December 30, 2011 Author Posted December 30, 2011 14:41 left Idaho 38 UND 29 11-2 Sioux run!!! Idaho is 1-12 on FG so far this half.
darell1976 Posted December 30, 2011 Author Posted December 30, 2011 11:55 left Idaho 40 UND 33 Idaho shooting 13.3% in the 2nd half...UND shooting 40%, but 1-4 on 3 pointers.
darell1976 Posted December 30, 2011 Author Posted December 30, 2011 6:28 left Idaho 47 UND 41 UND outscoring Idaho 23-11 in the second half!
darell1976 Posted December 30, 2011 Author Posted December 30, 2011 1:30 left Idaho 49 UND 46 Horrible 3 pt shooting 2-13!!
darell1976 Posted December 30, 2011 Author Posted December 30, 2011 Idaho wins 53-50 UND shot 28% FG, but most of the scoring was in the second half outscoring Idaho 32-17. Good try but you can't let yourself get that far behind in the first half.
Let'sGoHawks! Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 Gene Roebuck had a classic Jim Mora-esque rant on the radio postgame when it was mentioned that the team had a nice comeback. Paraphrasing, he said comebacks are "baloney", you either win or lose, that is it. He mentioned he was very upset with the effort, and they didn't represent North Dakota well tonight. He was PISSED! Anyone else hear it? 1
Ole in MSP Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 Gene Roebuck had a classic Jim Mora-esque rant on the radio postgame when it was mentioned that the team had a nice comeback. Paraphrasing, he said comebacks are "baloney", you either win or lose, that is it. He mentioned he was very upset with the effort, and they didn't represent North Dakota well tonight. He was PISSED! Anyone else hear it? Isn't this type of performance and post game response getting to be a regular event. Mizzou most recently comes to mind, but there are others. These kids better soon realize this is D1 not DIII. The scholarships are to perform and win, not just compete and be nice scholars.
zonadub Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 Isn't this type of performance and post game response getting to be a regular event. Mizzou most recently comes to mind, but there are others. These kids better soon realize this is D1 not DIII. The scholarships are to perform and win, not just compete and be nice scholars. Unfortunately, you are correct, Ole. in D-I, It's not about being student athletes anymore. Now its about being winning athletes, the student part has been lost. That, to me, is the downside of the move to D-I. Welcome to the world of Ohio State, Miami and Southern Cal.
sioux2013 Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 Gene Roebuck had a classic Jim Mora-esque rant on the radio postgame when it was mentioned that the team had a nice comeback. Paraphrasing, he said comebacks are "baloney", you either win or lose, that is it. He mentioned he was very upset with the effort, and they didn't represent North Dakota well tonight. He was PISSED! Anyone else hear it? I heard. He also said he wished they were not wearing a North Dakota jersey. Said he wished they had another name on their jerseys cause they embarrassed the university and what it stood for. OUCH I think he is trying to get fired with his post game remarks.
gfhockey Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 Faison will get canned before Gene does and thats a guarentee too! if they fired gene, u can kiss 75% of bball donations good bye. I would stop donating (even though its a little bit) if they fired him. Why donate to something you dont believein
Cratter Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 I heard. He also said he wished they were not wearing a North Dakota jersey. Said he wished they had another name on their jerseys cause they embarrassed the university and what it stood for. OUCH I think he is trying to get fired with his post game remarks. Showing passion and a dedication for hardwork and the thrive to win is hardly worthy of being "fired." Quite the opposite.
fightingsioux4life Posted December 30, 2011 Posted December 30, 2011 I think it's becoming painfully clear that this team simply does not have the shooters to win consistently against Division I teams. You won't totally shut down many teams at this level (the athletes are simply too good), so you better knock down some shots on a regular basis or you can forget about winning. Aside from eliminating the shot clock, I don't know what can be done to help the team in its current form win these games.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now