Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

gundy1124

Members
  • Posts

    2,955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Everything posted by gundy1124

  1. I am going to have a heart attack!!
  2. not when we played NDSU!! We sat under center like a bunch of idiots the whole game. USD did what many on here said we should have done.
  3. I've homered some picks this year.......don't like where we are at with things this week. Weber 24 - UND 16
  4. I already covered that.......we rarely surprise anyone with when we run/pass anyway, so what's the difference? We 'should' have more pass options off that formation, to keep teams on their toes, so I know what you are saying.
  5. With Studsrud out this week, with the lack of mobility with the other QB's, with the play calling not really surprising anyone as far as run/pass.........let's put a 'runner' in the Wildcat to take some snaps for a change of pace. I think Keaton has broke 2 of these runs for TDs and other runs were good gainers...........This idea is not too far out there -
  6. Are you sure..... I asked why Brown was even playing......and now he isn't.
  7. I would have liked to see Flowers in, too. Swede was a step slow with some bad angles, Johnson is more of a run support Safety, also had some terrible angles to the ball, and what I hear about Flowers is he has good ball skills. To chime in about C. Carter, he is really a thick and strong kid, great effort all the time. I think the concern is his speed could be a liability with 1 on 1 matchups. Seems like maybe at outside backer or safety could be an option.......or maybe a nickel/dime package but with teams not huddling they force you to stay in your base package. Thanks for following UND football.
  8. For real??
  9. Early report - Cole and Clive - good chance, yes Studsy - No, Let the Bartles vs. Molberg analysis begin for the week!!
  10. Yes, you could see a gap in athleticism with ISU WRs getting open, then getting yards after catch. Harris lost confidence as the game went on, to the trained eye.
  11. I will try to explain the softness and strategy. ISU often runs a run blocking scheme up front, but their o-line will stay within 3 yards of the line of scrimmage. The receivers run their routes for a pass play in combination with the modified run blocking and therefore, every play the QB can give it to the RB or can pass. We decided to stop the run and play coverage, and this was effective for over half the game and was probably unexpected for ISU. Our inside backers seemed sucked in a lot when they threw the ball, in no man's land. I feel ISU adjusted, or threw to their stud WR whenever they needed something and UND failed to counter adjust. With ISU leading the nation in turnovers........we thought they would make enough mistakes making them grind out drives. Also, it was obvious in a game like this our skill players have a ways to go...... If we had a shut down corner like Portland St., we win the game, no doubt.
  12. With ISU's hurry up offense, with stops comes more offensive possessions for UND, which we convert to points. I think Anderson starts while Reyes and Clive are out, but not for long, watch out Weber. We score 42, they score 20.
  13. Right on! Soccer in the morning, followed by hockey, barely caught the stream of Portland St game.
  14. I say it's a must win, too. We can't lose to a team that got smoked 80-8 to UNLV, and UNLV could of scored 100. If we finish drives with touchdowns we'll be OK. If we are kicking FG's, then it's a toss-up.
  15. More excited than the combined score of 132 - 8 that his team showed against Boise and UNLV...... Kramer gives me the creeps -
  16. We are missing a 'coolness' factor for football that hockey has, no doubt. (and it's probably not even cool to say 'coolness') I don't have a good answer except everyone likes a winner and a program they can be proud of.
  17. And......Va Tech got their ass kicked, but a good entrance. Seems with a dome stadium we are limited, but I like the team entering through the fan base, like Clemson.
  18. I am a little surprised, Olivera looks good with the ball. Arrington and Smith, not so much. If everyone is healthy I would scratch Arrington for the year and try Smith at Wide out. With Olivera getting some carries why not have Santiago available for a jet sweep or two. We seem to like Norberg in for pass protection but makes me wonder when the Portland St announcers are calling out our pass plays when he is in.
  19. Because that makes sense, pound a team on the road and be ranked lower then that team. Thanks for the 8-9 points this weekend, too......didn't even need them!!
  20. I am not going to judge. Everyone wants what is best for the program, and visions differ. We are 4-1, so let's rally the troops and make some noise Saturday. Hopefully a lot of guys from the '95 team make an appearance for their 20 year honor.
  21. we are 4-1, that is a fact. All the other stuff was your opinion. FYI
  22. Just guessing Reyes sprained something, hopefully nothing more. Just guessing Taj blew something, ACL likely, the way he was carried off. We are experts, right?? So I don't know for sure, just speculating a little, awaiting word and hoping for the best.
  23. some secondary expertise......? Welcome. With Reyes out a few weeks, what's the plan? We are all experts here, ha ha.
  24. It has been quiet with Reyes, haven't heard anything. I think Taj is done the way he was carried off. Fingers are crossed........
  25. Game managers don't rush for over 100 yards. I agree Studsrud needs to be more consistent with his throws, and needs to deliver balls that receivers can catch in stride. He seems to throw better rolling out than sitting in the pocket.
×
×
  • Create New...